Startseite Exact Solutions of the Nonlocal Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Perturbation Term
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Exact Solutions of the Nonlocal Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Perturbation Term

  • Da-Wei Zuo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Januar 2018

Abstract

Analytical solutions of both the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) and NLSE with a perturbation term have been attained. Besides, analytical solutions of nonlocal NLSE have also been obtained. In this paper, the nonlocal NLSE with a perturbation term is discussed. By virtue of the dependent variable substitution, trilinear forms of this equation is attained. Lax pairs and Darboux transformation of this equation are obtained. Via the Darboux transformation, two kinds solutions of this equation with the different seed solutions are attained.

1 Introduction

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9],

(1)iμς+12μζζ+μ2μ=0,

has been used to characterise rogue waves generated by nonlinear energy transfer in an open ocean [2] and broadband optical pulse propagation in nonlinear fibres [3], where i2=−1, ∗ is the complex conjugate, while μ is the envelope of the wave field and depends on the variables ς and ζ [3]. Rogue waves and solitons are both the analysis solutions of (1) with different seed solutions. Physically speaking, a rogue wave is thought of as an isolated huge wave with an amplitude claimed to be much larger than the average wave crests around it in the ocean [4], [5], [6] and also seen in other fields [2], [7], [6]. A soliton is a solitary wave that preserves its velocity and shape after an interaction [4]; i.e. the soliton can be considered as a quasi-particle [8], [9].

Besides, nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a perturbation term has also been studied [10]:

(2)iPιPκκ2(PPB2)P=0,

where B is a real constant and P is a complex function of the real variables ι and κ. The trivial condensate solution of (2) is P=B. While this solution is unstable with respect to small perturbations, the growth rate of instability is pB2p2/4, where p is the wave number of perturbation. Relations of rogue waves and the nonlinear stage of modulation instability for (2) have been attained via the dressing method [10].

On the other hand, nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation have been discussed [11]:

(3)iQ(X,T)tQ(X,T)XX2Q(X,T)2Q(X,T)=0,

where Q(X, T) is the complex-valued function of the real variables X and T. Solutions of (3) have been attained by virtue of the inverse scattering transform [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. It is remarkable that (3) turns out to be Lax integrable [12], [13], [14], [15]. Some properties of (3) has also been proved as follows [11]: time-reversal symmetry: if Q(X, T) is a solution, so is Q*(X, −T); invariance under the transformation X→−X: If Q(X, T) is a solution, so is Q(−X, T); PT symmetry: if Q(x, t) is a solution, so is Q*(−X, −T); gauge invariance: if Q(X, T) is a solution, so is exp(iθ0)Q(X, T) with real and constant θ0; complex translation invariance: If Q(X, T) is a solution, so is Q(X+iX0, T) for any constant and real X0.

In this paper, we will work on the the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a perturbation,

(4)iq(x,t)tq(x,t)xx+2q(x,t)[q(x,t)q(x,t)A2]=0,

where q(x, t) is a complex function of the real variables x and t and A is a real constant. We note that (4) also has the same properties as (3) as mentioned above; q(x, t)=A is a condensate solution of (4).

The paper is organised as follows. By virtue of the symbolic computation [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], in Section 2, Lax pairs, Darboux transforms, and N-order solutions of (4) will be obtained. In Section 3, trilinear forms of (4) will be attained. In Section 3 are the conclusions.

2 Lax Pairs and Darboux Transformation of (4)

Lax pairs could transform a nonlinear evolution equation into a linear system. Thus, via the lax pairs, N-order solutions of (4) can be obtained. By virtue of the Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur [21] procedure, Lax pairs of (4) are

(5)Φ(x,t)x=UΦ(x,t),   Φ(x,t)t=VΦ(x,t),

where Φ(x, t)=[ϕ11(x, t), ϕ12(x, t)]T is a vector function of x and t, superscript T denotes the transposition for the vector/matrix, U and V are both the matrix functions of x and t as follows:

U=[λq(x,t)q(x,t)λ],V=[i[q(x,t)q(x,t)A2]2iλ22iλq(x,t)iq(x,t)x2iλq(x,t)iq(x,t)x2iλ2i[q(x,t)q(x,t)A2]],

where λ is the complex spectrum parameter. Via the compatibility condition, Ut−Vx+UV−VU=0, (4) can be attained.

2.1 Darboux Transformation of (4)

In this section, Darboux transformation of (4) will be attained. We set that q0(x, t) is the seed solution of (4) and Φ(x, t)=[ϕ11(x, t), ϕ12(x, t)]T is a solution of Lax pairs (5) at q0(x, t) and λ=λ1, while λ1 is a complex spectrum parameter independent of x and t. Then, Ψ(x, t)=[−ϕ12(−x, t), −ϕ11(−x, t)]T is also a solution of Lax pairs (5) at q0(x, t) and λ=λ1. A Darboux matrix M has the form

(6)M1=λ2EH1Λ1H11,
(7)H1=[ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)],   Λ1=[λ100λ1],

where E is the two-order identity matrix and the superscript −1 denotes the inverse matrix. Therefore, the first-order solutions of (4) is attained as

(8)q1(x,t)=q0(x,t)+2(λ1λ1)ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ12(x,t).

Iterating the Darboux transformation N (N=1, 2, 3,…) times, we can give the N-order solutions of (4) as:

(9)q[N]=q[0]+2k=1N(λkλk)ϕk1(x,t)ϕk2(x,t)ϕk1(x,t)ϕk1(x,t)ϕk2(x,t)ϕk2(x,t),

with λk’s as the different complex parameters and

(10)[ϕk+11(x,t)  ϕk+12(x,t)]T=Mk[ϕk1(x,t)  ϕk2(x,t)]T,
(11)Mk=λk+1EHkΛkHk1,
(12)Λk=[λk00λk],Hk=[ϕk1(x,t)ϕk2(x,t)ϕk2(x,t)ϕk1(x,t)],k=1,2,3,,N,

where [ϕk1(λk), ϕk2(λk)]T is a solution of Lax pairs (5) at λ=λk and q=q[k−1] while ϕk1(x, t) and ϕk2(x, t) are all the functions of x and t.

2.2 Solutions of (4)

In the following, we will attain some solutions with different seed solutions of (4) via (9).

Case 1. We will take q(x, t)=0 as the seed solution, then the solutions of Lax pairs (5) at λ=λ1 is

(13)[ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)]=[exp(η1)exp(η1)],   η1=λ1xi(A2+2λ12)t+δ1,

where δ1 is a complex constant. The first-order solutions of (4) are

(14)q1(x,t)=2(λ1λ1)exp(2iA2t)exp[2δ1+2λ1(x+2itλ1)]exp[2δ1+2λ1(x+2itλ1)].

It can be found that solutions (11) has a singularity. To study those properties, we rewrite λ1=Re(λ1)+Im(λ1) and δ1=Re(δ1)+Im(δ1), where Re(x) and Im(x) denote the real part and image part of x, respectively. Singularity points of (11) are along the characteristic line

(15)Re(δ1)+4Re(λ1)Im(λ1)tiIm(λ1)x=0.

If we repeat the process for the expressions in Section 2.1, two-order solutions of (4) can be attained as follows:

(16)q2(x,t)=q1(x,t)+2(λ2λ2)ϕ21(x,t)ϕ22(x,t)ϕ21(x,t)ϕ21(x,t)ϕ22(x,t)ϕ22(x,t),

where

(17)[ϕ21(x,t)  ϕ21(x,t)]T=M1[exp(η1)  exp(η1)]T,
(18)H1=[exp(η1)exp[λ1xi(A2+2(λ1)2t)δ1]exp(η1)exp[λ1x+i(A2+2(λ1)2t)+δ1]].

If we continue such process, we can derive the N-order solutions of (4).

Case 2. Plane wave seed solutions of (4) will be taken in the following. We take q0(x, t)=c exp[−2(A2+c2)it] as the seed solution of (4), where c is a real constant. We introduce the following transformation:

(19)λj=ic2(ξj1ξj),  ξj=Rjexp(iβj),   (j=1,2,3,,N)

where βj is an angle and belongs to [0, 2π] and Rj is a real constant.

In this case we can take the wave functions as

(20)ϕ11(x,t)=[h1exp(k1x+w1t+iβ1)+ih2exp(k1xw1t)]expi(A2+c2)t,
(21)ϕ12(x,t)=[h1exp(k1xw1t+iβ1)+ih2exp(k1x+w1t)]exp[i(A2+c2)t],

where k1 and w1 are both the complex constant independent x and t. By virtue of Lax pairs (5), relations of β1, k1, w1, h1, and h2 are obtained as

k1=iceiβ1[1+R12exp(2iβ1)]2R1,   w1=ic2exp(2iβ1)[R14exp(4iβ1)1]2R12,   h1=R1h2.

Thus, the first-order solutions of (4) are

(22)q1(x,t)=q0(x,t)2ic(R11R1)cosβ1ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ12(x,t).

Second-order solutions of (4) are

(23)q2(x,t)=q1(x,t)2ic(R21R2)cosβ2ϕ21(x,t)ϕ22(x,t)ϕ21(x,t)ϕ21(x,t)ϕ22(x,t)ϕ22(x,t),

where ϕ21(x, t) and ϕ22(x, t) are

(24)[ϕ21(x,t)  ϕ21(x,t)]T=M1[ϕ11(x,t)  ϕ12(x,t)]T,
(25)H1=[ϕ11(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ12(x,t)ϕ11(x,t)].

If we continue such process, we can derive the N-order solutions of (4).

3 Trilinear Forms of (4)

Multi-linear forms of the nonlinear evolution equations can help people to attain their solutions, especially to the bilinear forms of those [22]. In the following, we will obtain the trilinear forms of (4) by virtue of the independent variable substitution. With the aid of the transformation,

(26)q(x,t)=g(x,t)f(x,t),

where f(x, t) is a real function of the variables x and t, while g(x, t) is a complex function of the variables x and t, (4) have the following trilinear forms:

(27)[iDtDx2]g(x,t)f(x,t)=ϱg(x,t)f(x,t),
(28)f(x,t)2g(x,t)+2f2(x,t)f(x,t)A2f(x,t)Dxf(x,t)f(x,t)=ϱf(x,t)2f(x,t),

where ?is a complex constant and the operator DxmDtn is defined as [22]

(29)DxmDtna(x,t)b(x,t)(xx)m(tt)na(x,t)b(x,t)|x=x,t=t,

with m and n both as the integers, a(x, t) as the function of x and t, and b(x′, t′) as the function of formal variables x′ and t′.

4 Conclusions

In this paper, we have studied the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation (4) with a perturbation term. Our main results are displayed as follows: (a) Trilinear forms (3) of (4) have been attained, by virtue of the independent variable transformation. (b) Lax pairs (5) and Darboux transformation (Section 2.1) have been both obtained. Via the Darboux transformation, two kinds of the N-order solutions of (4) with different seed solutions have been attained. From the above discussion, we have found that some properties of (4) are different from both (3) and (2).

References

[1] V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 62 (1972).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, P. Koonath, and B. Jalali, Nature 405, 1054 (2007).10.1038/nature06402Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, Springer, Berlin 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511623998Suche in Google Scholar

[5] F. A. Smirnov, Form Factors in Completely Integrable Models of Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore 1992.10.1142/1115Suche in Google Scholar

[6] N. Akhmediev, V. M. Eleonskii, and N. E. Kulagin, Theor. Math. Phys. 72, 809 (1987).10.1007/BF01017105Suche in Google Scholar

[7] N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, and J. M. Soto-Crespo, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026601 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026601Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] N. Benes, A. Kasman, and K. Young, J. Nonlinear Sci. 16, 179 (2006).10.1007/s00332-005-0709-2Suche in Google Scholar

[9] I. Christov and C. I. Christov, Phys. Lett. A 372, 841 (2008).10.1016/j.physleta.2007.08.038Suche in Google Scholar

[10] V. E. Zakharov and A. A. Gelash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 054101 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.054101Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 064105 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.064105Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] C. Q. Dai and Y. Y. Wang, Nonlinear Dynam. 80, 715 (2015).10.1007/s11071-015-1900-0Suche in Google Scholar

[13] C. Q. Dai and Y. Y. Wang, Nonlinear Dynam. 83, 2453 (2016).10.1007/s11071-015-2493-3Suche in Google Scholar

[14] L. Q. Kong and C. Q. Dai, Nonlinear Dynam 81, 1553 (2015).10.1007/s11071-015-2089-ySuche in Google Scholar

[15] C. Q. Dai, Y. Wang, and J. Liu, Nonlinear Dynam 84, 1157 (2016).10.1007/s11071-015-2560-9Suche in Google Scholar

[16] H. X. Jia, Y. J. Liu, and Y. N. Wang, Z. Naturforsch. A 71, 27 (2016).10.1515/zna-2015-0306Suche in Google Scholar

[17] H. X. Jia, J. Y. Ma, Y. J. Liu, and X. F. Liu, Indian J. Phys. 89, 281 (2015).10.1007/s12648-014-0544-0Suche in Google Scholar

[18] H. X. Jia and D. M. Shan, Z. Naturforsch. A 72, 1071 (2017).10.1515/zna-2017-0227Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Z. Z. Lan, Y. T. Gao, J. W. Yang, C. Q. Su, C. Zhao, et al., Appl. Math. Lett. 60, 96 (2016).10.1016/j.aml.2016.03.021Suche in Google Scholar

[20] X. H. Zhao, B. Tian, H. M. Li, and Y.J. Guo, Appl. Math. Lett. 65, 48 (2017).10.1016/j.aml.2016.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

[21] M. J. Ablowtiz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and H. Segur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 125 (1973).10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.125Suche in Google Scholar

[22] R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511543043Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-12-23
Accepted: 2018-01-03
Published Online: 2018-01-26
Published in Print: 2018-02-23

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2017-0465/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen