Startseite Digging into the Elusive Localised Solutions of (2+1) Dimensional sine-Gordon Equation
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Digging into the Elusive Localised Solutions of (2+1) Dimensional sine-Gordon Equation

  • R. Radha EMAIL logo und C. Senthil Kumar
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. April 2018

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation analysed earlier [R. Radha and M. Lakshmanan, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 29, 1551 (1996)] employing the Truncated Painlevé Approach. We then generate the solutions in terms of lower dimensional arbitrary functions of space and time. By suitably harnessing the arbitrary functions present in the closed form of the solution, we have constructed dromion solutions and studied their collisional dynamics. We have also constructed dromion pairs and shown that the dynamics of the dromion pairs can be turned ON or OFF desirably. In addition, we have also shown that the orientation of the dromion pairs can be changed. Apart from the above classes of solutions, we have also generated compactons, rogue waves and lumps and studied their dynamics.

1 Introduction

The advent of localised solutions in terms of doubly periodic Jacobian elliptic functions [1], [2], [3] using the Painlevé Truncation Approach has completely revived the interest in the study of (2+1) dimensional integrable models and has given a filip to the identification of more general localised structures. The fact that the exponentially localised solutions called ‘dromions’ generated by Boiti et al. [4] fits into this category of solutions only as a special case has given a new dimension to the investigation of (2+1) dimensional integrable models in an effort to generate other elusive localised solutions like rogue waves, lumps etc. Rogue waves which are another interesting class of solutions, finds application in various fields [5], [6] such as hydrodynamics [7], [8], [9], [10], nonlinear optics [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], Bose Einstein condensates [19], [20], plasma physics [21]. The important feature of rogue waves is that they come from nowhere and disappear with no trace. Lumps [22] which are algebraically localised solutions do not interact with each other. In this context, it would be interesting to revisit the (2+1) sine-Gordon equation in an attempt to extract such localised solutions in it.

2 (2+1) Dimensional sine-Gordon Equation

Konopelchenko and Rogers [23], [24] have proposed an interesting symmetric generalisation of the sine-Gordon equation to (2+1) dimensions through a reinterpretation and generalisation of a class of infinitesimal Bäcklund transformations originally introduced in gas dynamics by Loewner [25] as far back in 1952 to give the system of equations

(1)[ϕξsinθ]ξ[ϕηsinθ]η+(ϕηθξϕξθη)sin2θ=0,
(2)[ϕξsinθ]ξ[ϕηsinθ]η+(ϕξθηϕηθξ)sin2θ=0,

where θt=ϕ+ϕ′. If we assume that ϕ′=0 and that θt=ϕ is independent of y, then (1, 2) becomes trivial and (1) gives the (1+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation

(3)θξt=sinθ.

Eventhough the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation has more representations, a more convenient and elegant representation is given by

(4)θxyt+12ρxθy+12ρyθx=0,
(5)ρxy=12(θxθy)t,

where

(6)ρx=[ϕyϕy]+θytcosθsinθ,ρy=[ϕxϕx]θxtcosθsinθ,

with the characteristic variables x and y having the form

(7)x=12(ησξ),y=12(η+σξ),

where σ2=±1 and ρ is some potential. Here σ2=1 corresponds to the sine-Gordon I equation and σ2=−1, the sine-Gordon II equation. We introduce the transformation

(8)q=iσ2θy,r=iσ2θx,

in (4, 5) and convert the system into a system of three coupled equations as

(9)qxt+12ρxq+12ρyr=0,
(10)ryt+12ρxq+12ρyr=0,
(11)σ2ρxy=2(qr)t.

The (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation has been investigated earlier by Radha and Lakshmanan [26] and dromion solutions have been generated. Later, Lou [27] has constructed localised solutions such as Plateau, basin, bowl and ring solitons using Variable Separation Approach. However, the nature of the collisional dynamics of dromions has not yet been understood. The question of the existence of other localised solution like lumps and rogue waves also remains open. In this paper, we utilise Truncated Painlevé Approach [1], [2], [3] to construct solutions of (2+1) sine-Gordon equation in terms of lower dimensional arbitrary functions of space and time. Expanding the physical fields q, r and the potential ρ in the form of a Laurent series in the neighbourhood of the noncharacteristic singular manifold ϕ(x, y, t)=0, (ϕx=ϕy≠0) and utilising the results of the Painlevé analysis [26], we obtain the following Bäcklund transformation by truncating at the constant level term

(12)q=q0ϕ1+q1,
(13)r=r0ϕ1+r1,
(14)ρ=ρ0ϕ1+ρ1,

where q1, r1, ρ1 are arbitrary solutions of the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation.

Considering the first vacuum solution given by:

(15)q1=r1=0,ρ1=ρ(t),

we now substitute (15) with (12–14) in (9–11) to obtain the following set of equations by equating the coefficients of (ϕ−3, ϕ−3, ϕ−3) to obtain

(16)2q0ϕxϕt12ρ0q0ϕx12ρ0r0ϕy=0,
(17)2r0ϕyϕt12ρ0q0ϕx12ρ0r0ϕy=0,
(18)σ2ρ0ϕxϕy=2q0r0ϕt.

Solving the above system of equations, we obtain the leading order coefficients, namely

(19)r02=σ2ϕx2,
(20)q02=σ2ϕy2,
(21)ρ0=2ϕt.

Now, we collect the coefficients of (ϕ−2, ϕ−2, ϕ−2) to obtain

(22)q0xϕtq0tϕxq0ϕxt+12ρ0xq0+12ρ0yr0=0,
(23)r0yϕtr0tϕyr0ϕyt+12ρ0xq0+12ρ0yr0=0,
(24)ρ0xϕy+ρ0yϕx+ρ0ϕxy=2(q0tr0+q0r0t).

Solving the above system of equations, we obtain the following system of equations in ϕ

(25)ϕtϕxy=0,
(26)ϕyϕxyϕt=0,
(27)ϕxϕxyϕt=0.

From the above equations, we arrive at a solution for ϕ of the form

(28)ϕ=c+ϕ1(x,t)+ϕ2(y,t),

where c is an arbitrary constant. The presence of a non-zero constant is imminent so as to avoid the occurrence of singularity in the solutions when the arbitrary functions ϕ1, ϕ2 → 0. Collecting the powers of (ϕ−1, ϕ−1, ϕ−1), we have

(29)q0xt=0,
(30)r0yt=0,
(31)ρ0xy=0.

One can easily check the compatibility of (29–31) with the (19–21) along with (28).

Collecting the coefficients of (ϕ0, ϕ0, ϕ0), we are left with only one equation

(32)ρ1xy=0.

This is an identity.

Thus, for the choice of initial vacuum solution given by (15), the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation (9–11) has been solved through Truncated Painlevé Approach and the fields q, r, and ρ are given by

(33)q=±σϕ2yc+ϕ1(x,t)+ϕ2(y,t),
(34)r=±σϕ1xc+ϕ1(x,t)+ϕ2(y,t),
(35)ρ=2(ϕ1t+ϕ2t)c+ϕ1(x,t)+ϕ2(y,t)+ρ1(t).

We wish to point out at this juncture that different initial solution other than the one given by (15) could lead to different solution of the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation.

3 Novel Solutions of (2+1) Dimensional sine-Gordon Equation

By choosing the arbitrary functions ϕ1 and ϕ2 in (33–35) in the following form, we obtain dromion solution

(36)ϕ1=tanh(ax+c1t+d1),ϕ2=tanh(by+c2t+d2).

The plot of the (1,1) dromion for the parametric choice a=2, b=2, c=9, c1=3, c2=5, d1=d2=0, t=0 is shown in Figure 1a. It can be observed that the dromion travels with unit velocity along x direction in the xy plane. Figure 1b shows that the potential ρ(x, y, t) is driven by a line soliton.

Figure 1: (a) (1,1) Dromion solution, (b) the solution corresponding to the potential ρ.
Figure 1:

(a) (1,1) Dromion solution, (b) the solution corresponding to the potential ρ.

3.1 More General Periodic Solutions and Multi Dromion Solutions

3.1.1 (2,1) Dromion

Next, we obtain more general dromion solution for a different choice of the arbitrary functions. As an example, we choose

(37)ϕ1=f1tanh(a1x+c1t+d1),ϕ2=f2tanh(b1y+c2t+d2)+f3tanh(b2y+c3t+d3),

where ai, bi, ci, di and fi are arbitrary constants.

The (2,1) dromion solution for the parametric choice a1=2, b1=2, b2=3, c1=3, c2=5, c3=−2, d1=d2=d3=0, f1=f2=0.5, f3=1, is shown in Figure 2a–c for three successive time intervals t=−2, 0 and 2. From the figures, we observe that both the taller and shorter dromions travel along the diagonals and fuse together generating a new dromion with its amplitude larger than the incident dromions. Unlike soliton interaction, they do not undergo any phase shift and exchange their amplitudes during interaction.

Figure 2: Collisional dynamics of (2,1) dromions at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.
Figure 2:

Collisional dynamics of (2,1) dromions at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.

3.2 Dromion Pairs

3.2.1 Case (i)

If we choose ϕ1=a1sech2(b1x+c1t)+a2sech2(b2x+c2t)+ a3sech2(b3x+c3t), ϕ2=1+sech2(d1y+c4t)+sech2(d2y+c5t), we can obtain six dromion pairs for the parametric choice, a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−55; (b) t=0; (c) t=55 as shown in Figure 3. From Figure 3, we identify three dromion pairs, moving along the diagonal direction, while three other pairs move along the x-direction. It should be noted that among the dromion pairs moving along the x-direction, the middle pair remaining stationary, while the taller pair moves from +x to −x direction and the shorter one travels in the opposite direction. One clearly observes that the three pairs interact elastically without exchanging energy.

Figure 3: Dromion triplet pairs for the parametric choice a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−55; (b) t=0; (c) t=55.
Figure 3:

Dromion triplet pairs for the parametric choice a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−55; (b) t=0; (c) t=55.

3.2.2 Case (ii)

If we choose, ϕ1=a1sech2(b1x+c1t)+a2sech2(b2x+c2t)+a3 sech2(b3x+c3t), ϕ2=1+sech2(d1y+c4t)+sech2(d2y+c5t), we observe a novel interaction of dromion pairs for the parametric choice, a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0.5; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0.5; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−35; (b) t=0; (c) t=35 as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Dromion triplet pairs for the parametric choice a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0.5; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0.5; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−35; (b) t=0; (c) t=35.
Figure 4:

Dromion triplet pairs for the parametric choice a1=0.8; a2=0.3; a3=1.5; b1=b2=b3=1; c1=0.5; c2=−0.25; c3=0.25; c4=0.5; c5=−0.25; d1=d2=1 at (a) t=−35; (b) t=0; (c) t=35.

In this case, we observe two important features. 1. All the dromion pairs are dynamic. 2. The three dromion pairs which were travelling along the x-direction in case (i) are now taking a diagonal path in the xy plane.

It must be mentioned that the present dromion pairs corresponding to case (ii) have more freedom compared to the dromion triplet pairs of the Ablowitz–Kaup–Newell–Segur equation [28], which are restricted to move only along the x-direction.

Thus, in the present case, we are not only turning ON or OFF the dynamic property of dromions, but also changing its orientation in the xy plane. As mentioned in [28], these dromion pairs are reminiscent of drones, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles employed in military, logistics etc.

3.3 Compactons

Next, we try to construct compacton solution whose interaction shows particle like behaviour. The construction of compactons bears immense significance in view of the relevance of sine-Gordon equation in the context of particle physics. To obtain compactons, we assume that the arbitrary functions are driven by piecewise functions of the form

(38)ϕ1=i=1N{0,kixωit+x0iπ/2bisin(kixωit+x0i),π/2<kixωit+x0iπ/22bi,kixωit+x0i>π/2,
(39)ϕ2=i=1M{0,liy+y0iπ/2disin(liy+y0i)di,π/2<liy+y0iπ/22di,liy+y0i>π/2.

By choosing N=2, M=1, we get two compacton solution for the parametric choice k1=k2=−1, ω1=1, ω2=2, b1=2, b2=1, x01=x02=y01=0. The time evolution of the compactons for different time intervals is shown in Figure 5. The two compactons move in the x-direction with different velocities, and they interact at t=0 and then move forward without any change in shape or velocity.

Figure 5: The time evolution of two compacton solution at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.
Figure 5:

The time evolution of two compacton solution at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.

3.4 Rogue Waves

To obtain rogue waves, we assume that the arbitrary functions in the following form

(40)ϕ1=cp1t(αx2+1)2+cp2t(2(t4)2+1)2,
(41)ϕ2=p3(y2+3)4γ2.

By choosing the following parameters choice α=0.1, β=2, γ=0.05, c=25, p1=1, p2=1, p3=1, σ=1, the plot of the time evolution of the rogue wave solution is shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 underscores the unstable nature of rogue waves.

Figure 6: The time evolution of rogue wave at (a) t=−11.7; (b) t=−11; (c) t=−10.
Figure 6:

The time evolution of rogue wave at (a) t=−11.7; (b) t=−11; (c) t=−10.

3.5 Lump Solution

To obtain lump solutions, we assume the arbitrary function in the following form

(42)ϕ1=m1((xαt)2+1)+1,
(43)ϕ2=m2((yβt)2+1)+1.

For the following parametric choice m1=0.55, m2=2, α=0.8 and β=0.4, we obtain lump solutions for different time intervals as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: The time evolution of the lump solution at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.
Figure 7:

The time evolution of the lump solution at (a) t=−2; (b) t=0; (c) t=2.

4 Discussion

In this paper, we have considered the (2+1) dimensional sine-Gordon equation and investigated it using the Truncated Painlevé Approach to obtain its solution in closed form involving three lower dimensional arbitrary functions. We have then constructed dromions and studied their interactions. We have also studied the interaction of dromion pairs. It is shown that the dynamics of the dromion pairs can be turned ON or OFF in a desirable manner. In addition, the direction of the dromion pairs can be modified. We have also used the above analysis to construct other classes of localised solutions like compactons which remain localised over a small region of space and their associated interactions. In addition, we have also constructed rogue wave solutions and lump solutions and studied their dynamics.

Acknowledgements

R.R. acknowledges Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India (grant 03(1323)/14/EMR-II dated 03.11.2014) and Department of Atomic Energy – National Board of Higher Mathematics (DAE-NBHM), Govt. of India (grant 2/48(21)/2014/NBHM(R.P.)/R&DII/15451) for financial support in the form of Major Research Projects.

References

[1] R. Radha, C. Senthil Kumar, M. Lakshmanan, X. Y. Tang, and S. Y. Lou, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 38, 9649 (2005).10.1088/0305-4470/38/44/003Suche in Google Scholar

[2] R. Radha and S. Y. Lou, Phys. Scr. 72, 432 (2005).10.1088/0031-8949/72/6/002Suche in Google Scholar

[3] R. Radha, X. Y. Tang, and S. Y. Lou, Z. Naturforsch. 62a, 107 (2007).10.1515/zna-2007-3-401Suche in Google Scholar

[4] M. Boiti, J. J. P. Leon, L. Martina, and F. Pempinelli, Phys. Lett. A 132, 432 (1988).10.1016/0375-9601(88)90508-7Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Onorato, S. Residori, U. Bortolozzo, A. Montina, and F. T. Arecchi, Phys. Rep. 528, 47 (2013).10.1016/j.physrep.2013.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

[6] A. Ankiewicz and N. Akhmediev, Rom. Rep. Phys. 69, 104 (2017).Suche in Google Scholar

[7] A. Chabchoub, N. P. Hoffmann, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 204502 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.204502Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Q. Zhu, J. Fei, and Z. Ma, Z. Naturforsch. A 72, 795 (2017).10.1515/zna-2017-0124Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Q. Zhu, Q. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 53, 1013 (2013).10.1134/S0965542513070191Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Q. Zhu, Q. Wang, J. Fu, and Z. Zhang, J. Appl. Math. 2012, 1 (2012).10.1155/2012/252487Suche in Google Scholar

[11] D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, P. Koonath, and B. Jalali, Nature 450, 1054 (2007).10.1038/nature06402Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, and B. Jalali, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233902 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233902Suche in Google Scholar

[13] B. Kibler, J. Fatome, C. Finot, G. Millot, F. Dias, et al., Nat. Phys. 6, 790 (2010).10.1038/nphys1740Suche in Google Scholar

[14] N. Akhmediev, B. Kibler, F. Baronio, M. Belić, W.-P. Zhong, et al., J. Opt. 18, 063001 (2016).10.1088/2040-8978/18/6/063001Suche in Google Scholar

[15] D. Mihalache, Rom. Rep. Phys. 69, 403 (2017).10.3917/ems.larde.2016.01.0069Suche in Google Scholar

[16] S. Chen, F. Baronio, J. M. Soto-Crespo, P. Grelu, and D. Mihalache, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 50, 463001 (2017).10.1088/1751-8121/aa8f00Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Y. Hu and Q. Zhu, Appl. Math. Comput. 305, 53 (2017).10.1016/j.amc.2017.01.023Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Hu and Q. Zhu, Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 225 (2017).10.1007/s11071-017-3448-7Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Y. V. Bludov, V. V. Konotop, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. 80, 033610 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevA.80.033610Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Z. Yan, V. V. Konotop, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. E 82, 036610 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevE.82.036610Suche in Google Scholar

[21] H. Bailung, S. K. Sharma, and Y. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255005 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.255005Suche in Google Scholar

[22] J. Satsuma and M. J. Ablowitz, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1496 (1979).10.1063/1.524208Suche in Google Scholar

[23] B. G. Konopelchenko and C. Rogers, Phys. Lett. 158A, 391 (1991).10.1016/0375-9601(91)90680-7Suche in Google Scholar

[24] B. G. Konopelchenko and C. Rogers, J. Math. Phys. 34, 214 (1993).10.1063/1.530377Suche in Google Scholar

[25] C. Loewner, J. Anal. Math. 2, 219 (1952–53).10.1007/BF02825638Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R. Radha and M. Lakshmanan, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 29, 1551 (1996).10.1088/0305-4470/29/7/023Suche in Google Scholar

[27] S. Y. Lou, J. Phys. A 36, 3877 (2003).10.1088/0305-4470/36/13/317Suche in Google Scholar

[28] R. Radha, C. Senthil Kumar, K. Subramanian, and T. Alagesan, Comput. Math. Appl., at Press (https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.camwa.2017.12.016) (2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-12-10
Accepted: 2018-02-19
Published Online: 2018-04-06
Published in Print: 2018-05-24

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2017-0447/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen