Abstract
Korteweg–de Vries (KdV)-type equation can be used to characterise the dynamic behaviours of the shallow water waves and interfacial waves in the two-layer fluid with gradually varying depth. In this article, by virtue of the bilinear forms, rational solutions and three kind shapes (soliton-like, kink and bell, anti-bell, and bell shapes) for the Nth-order soliton-like solutions of a coupled KdV system are derived. Propagation and interaction of the solitons are analyzed: (1) Potential u shows three kind of shapes (soliton-like, kink, and anti-bell shapes); Potential v exhibits two type of shapes (soliton-like and bell shapes); (2) Interaction of the potentials u and v both display the fusion phenomena.
1 Introduction
Nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) are used to describe the nonlinear physical phenomena in the nature. Among those models, Korteweg–de Vries (KdV)-type [1], [2], [3] equation can be used to characterise the dynamic behaviours of the shallow water waves, ion-acoustic waves in the plasmas, interfacial waves in the two-layer liquids with gradually varying depth, Alfv́en waves in the interaction plasmas, and acoustic waves in the anharmonic lattices [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].
Besides, several results of the KdV-type equation have been reported over the past few decades [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. For example, the integrability aspects, perturbation theories, numerical solutions, conservation laws, analytical solutions, and various other aspects have all been addressed. Among those results, soltion solutions and rational solutions have been studied because these have some special properties. Rational solutions are used to describe the rogue waves in the fluid mechanics and nonlinear optics [16], [17]. A rogue wave is thought of as an isolated huge wave with the amplitude much larger than the average wave crests around it in the ocean [17] and also seen in the Bose–Einstein condensates, optics, and superfluids [18], [19]. A soliton is a solitary wave that preserves its velocity and shape after the interaction [20], i.e. the soliton can be considered as a quasi-particle [21], [22].
In this article, we will work on a coupled KdV system, which is impressive in [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] and interest in the fluid physics [25], [28]
where the potential functions u and v are both the real functions of the scaled temporal coordinate t and spatial coordinate x and σ is an arbitrary constant. Lax pair by virtue of the prolongation structure, Painlevé analysis and soliton solutions via the Bäcklund transformation of (1) have all been attained [28].
To our knowledge, soliton solutions and rational solutions of (1) via the bilinear forms have not been obtained. With the aid of symbolic computation [29], [30], [31], in Section 2, Bilinear forms, rational solutions and three kind shapes of the Nth-order soliton-like solutions for (1) will be attained. In Section 3, wave propagation and interaction will be discussed. Section 4 will be the conclusions.
2 Bilinear Forms and Exact Solutions
Through the following dependent variable transformations,
where f is a function of the variables x and t, (1) becomes the trilinear forms as
We note that: When σ=2, Expression (5) can degenerate into Expression (6); When σ≠2, Expression (5) can be simplified as
We expand f into the power serious of a small parameter ϵ as
where fi′s (i=1, 2, …) are all the real functions of x and t.
2.1 Rational Solutions
In order to obtain the rational solutions for (1), we assume that
where lm′s (m=0, 1, 2, 3) and ξ are all the real numbers. Substituting Expression (10) into Expressions (7 and 8), we derive out the rational solutions of (1),
2.2 Soliton Solutions
In order to attain the first-order soliton-like solutions of (1), we assume that
where η1=k1x+w1t+δ1 and γ=kx−wt, while Q1, P1, R, k1, w1, k, w, and δ1 are all the real constants. Substituting Expression (13) into Expressions (7 and 8), we derive out the relationship between k1, w1, k, and w as
which is called the nonlinear dispersion relation [32].
Similarly, in order to derive the second-order soliton-like solutions, we set
where ηj=kjx+wjt+δj (j=1, 2), while Q2, P2, k2, w2, and δ2 are all the real constants. Substituting Expression (15) into Expressions (7 and 8), we have
Thus, we can obtain the second-order soliton-like solutions for (1) as
This process can be continued for us to derive the third-order soliton-like solutions, which can be written as
If we continue such process, the Nth-order soliton-like (N≥1) solutions of (1) are
where
We note that the values of Qj, Pj, and R can affect the shape, propagation, and interaction of the solitons. Thus, three type shapes (soliton-like, kink and bell, anti-bell, and bell shapes) of the soliton solutions for (1) will be obtained in the following.
Special case I
If QjPjR≠0 in Expressions (21 and 22), the N-order soliton-like solutions of (1) will be obtained. For example, when Q1=P1=R=1, the first-order soliton-like solutions are
where γ=kx+2k3t and
Special case II
If we take R=Pj=fj=0 and ϵ=Qj=1 in Expressions (21 and 22), the Nth-order kink and bell-shape soliton-like solutions for (1) can be attained. Such as, the one-order solutions are
Special case III
If we take R=fj=0 and ϵ=Qj=Pj=1 in Expressions (21 and 22), the Nth-order anti-bell and bell-shape soliton solutions for (1) can be obtained. For example, the one solitons are
3 Propagation and Interaction of the Solitons
In this section, propagation and interaction of the solitons will be analysed. We note that Rational Solutions (11 and 12) have the singularities when ξ+xl1+x2l2+x3l3+12tl3=0. Thus, we will only analyse the dynamic behaviours of the others via the graphics in the following.
3.1 Propagation and Interaction of the Special Case I
Figure 1 displays that the propagation of the soliton-like solutions. Potential u and v are both have the periodic properties, which are caused by the term R cos γ in Expression (13).

First-order soliton-like solutions for u and v via Expressions (23 and 24) with the parameters k1=0.9, k=1.2, δ1=σ=0, Q1=P1=1, R=0.6, and (a) of u; (b) of v.
Figure 2 shows the interaction of the second-order soliton-like solutions. Figures 1 and 2 display that the potential u is a dark soliton-like while the potential v is a bright soliton-like.

Second-order soliton-like solutions for u and v via Expressions (21 and 22) with the parameters N=2, k1=0.5, k2=1.1, k=1.6, σ=δ1=δ2=0, Q1=Q2=P1=P2=1, R=0.6, and (a) of u; (b) of v.
3.2 Propagation and Interaction of the Special Case II
Figure 3 shows that the shape of u is affected by the parameter σ. Figure 3(b) exhibits that the potential u is a shock wave when σ=2, while the potential u is composed of two shock waves when σ=0 as displayed in Figure 3(a) and (c). Besides, the direction of the one soliton-like propagation is decided by the sign of k1, i.e. Figure 3(a) and (c) have the counter directions of the soliton-like propagation, when k1 has the different sign.

One soliton-like solutions for u via Expression (25) with the parameters δ1=1.3 and (a) of k1=1.4, σ=0; (b) of k1=1.4, σ=2; and (c) of k1=−1.4, σ=0.
Figure 4 shows that the parameters k1 and σ have no effect on the shape and direction of the soliton-like propagation for the potential v. Besides, potential v is a bell shape soliton-like.

One soliton-like solutions for v via Expression (26) with the the same parameters as Figure 3, accordingly.
Figures 5 and 6 display the interaction of the two soliton-like solutions. Figures 5 and 6 exhibit that the potential u and v both have the fusion phenomena, when the parameters are taken as above.

Two soliton-like solutions for u and v via Expressions (17 and 18) with the parameters k1=1.4, k2=0.9, Q1=Q2=1, P1=P2=R=σ=δ1=δ2=0, and (a) of u; (b) of v.

Two soliton-like solutions for u and v via Expressions (17 and 18) with the parameters k1=1.4, k2=0.9, Q1=Q2=1, σ=2, P1=P2=R=δ1=δ2=0, and (a) of u; (b) of v.
3.3 Propagation and Interaction of the Special Case III
Figure 7 shows that the potential u is the anti-bell shape while potential v is a bell-shape soliton. Figures 1(a), 3, and 7(a) exhibit that the shape of the potential u changes with the values of Q1, P1, and R, while the potential v is a bright soliton in Figures 1(b), 4, and 7(b).

One-soliton solutions for u and v via Expressions (27 and 28) with the parameters k1=1.6, σ=0, and (a) of u; (b) of v.
Figure 8 exhibits that the interaction of the two solitons are elastic, i.e. the velocity and direction are invariable before and after interaction.

Two-soliton solutions for u and v via Expressions (21 and 22) with the parameters n=2, k1=1.6, k2=0.5, Q1=Q2=P1=P2=1, σ=R=δ1=δ2=0, and (a) of u; (b) of v.
4 Conclusions
Among the NLEEs, KdV-type equation can be used to characterise the dynamic behaviours of the shallow water waves and Alfv́en waves. In this article, a coupled KdV system (1) has been studied. Our main results as follows:
By virtue of the Bilinear Forms (7 and 8), Rational Solutions (11 and 12), Nth-order Soliton-Like Solutions (13), Kink-Bell-Shape Solutions (25 and 26) and Bell-Bell-Shape Solutions (27 and 28) have all been attained.
Propagation and interaction of the solitons have been analysed:
As the one-soliton pictures, potential u has exhibited three kind shapes, i.e. Figure 1(a) has shown the soliton-like shape, Figure 3 has displayed the kink shape, and Figure 7(a) has shown the anti-bell shape; Potential v has exhibited two type shapes, i.e. Figure 1(b) has exhibited the soliton-like shape, while Figures 4 and 7(b) have both shown the bell shape.
As the two-soliton pictures, potentials u and v have displayed the fusion phenomena in Figures 5 and 6, while potentials u and v have exhibited the elastic collision in Figures 2 and 8.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Foundation of Hebei Education Department of China under Grant No. QN2015051.
References
[1] R. Hirota and J. Satsuma, Phys. Lett. A 85, 407 (1981).10.1016/0375-9601(81)90423-0Search in Google Scholar
[2] H. C. Hu, B. Tong, and S. Y. Lou, Phys. Lett. A 351, 403 (2006).10.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.047Search in Google Scholar
[3] H. Q. Zhao, Eur. Phys. B 85, 1 (2012).10.1140/epjb/e2012-30975-2Search in Google Scholar
[4] M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 1981.10.1137/1.9781611970883Search in Google Scholar
[5] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, Cambridge University Press: New York 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511623998Search in Google Scholar
[6] A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 159, 577 (2004).10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.137Search in Google Scholar
[7] A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 204, 963 (2008).10.1016/j.amc.2008.08.007Search in Google Scholar
[8] A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 2277 (2010).10.1016/j.amc.2010.06.038Search in Google Scholar
[9] A. M. Wazwaz, Ocean Eng. 60, 95 (2013).10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.049Search in Google Scholar
[10] X. Lü, W. X. Ma, J. Yu, and C. M. Khalique, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 31, 40 (2016).10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.07.007Search in Google Scholar
[11] X. Lü and F. Lin, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 32, 241 (2016).10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.08.008Search in Google Scholar
[12] X. Lü, W. X. Ma, Y. Zhou, and C. M. Khalique, Comput. Math. Appl. 71, 1560 (2016).10.1016/j.camwa.2016.02.017Search in Google Scholar
[13] X. Lü, W. X. Ma, S. T. Chen, and C. M. Khalique, Appl. Math. Lett. 58, 13 (2016).10.1016/j.aml.2015.12.019Search in Google Scholar
[14] X. Lü, W. X. Ma, and C. M. Khalique, Appl. Math. Lett. 50, 37 (2015).10.1016/j.aml.2015.06.003Search in Google Scholar
[15] X. Lü, Nonlinear Dynam. 81, 239 (2015).10.1007/s11071-015-1985-5Search in Google Scholar
[16] D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, P. Koonath, and B. Jalali, Nature 405, 1054 (2007).10.1038/nature06402Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] N. Akhmediev, V. M. Eleonskii, and N. E. Kulagin, Theoret. Math. Phys. 72, 809 (1987).10.1007/BF01017105Search in Google Scholar
[18] A. Ankiewicz, J. M. Soto-Crespo, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046602 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046602Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, and J. M. Soto-Crespo, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026601 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026601Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear evolution equations and inverse scattering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511623998Search in Google Scholar
[21] N. Benes, A. Kasman, and K. Young, J. Nonlinear Sci. 16, 179 (2006).10.1007/s00332-005-0709-2Search in Google Scholar
[22] I. Christov and C. I. Christov, Phys. Lett. A 372, 841 (2008).10.1016/j.physleta.2007.08.038Search in Google Scholar
[23] S. I. Svinolupov, Theor. Mat. Fiz. 87, 391 (1991).10.1007/BF01017947Search in Google Scholar
[24] S. I. Svinolupov, Funct. Anal. Appl. 27, 257 (1994).10.1007/BF01078843Search in Google Scholar
[25] M. Gurses, A. (Kalkanli) Karasu, Phys. Lett. A 214, 21 (1996).10.1016/0375-9601(96)00171-5Search in Google Scholar
[26] A. (Kalkanli) Karasu, J. Theoret. Phys. 36, 705 (1997).10.1007/BF02435890Search in Google Scholar
[27] A. (Kalkanli) Karasu, J. Math. Phys. 38 (7), 3616 (1997).10.1063/1.532056Search in Google Scholar
[28] D. S. Wang and X. Q. Wei, Appl. Math. Lett. 51, 60 (2016).10.1016/j.aml.2015.07.007Search in Google Scholar
[29] B. Tian and Y. T. Gao, Phys. Lett. A 342, 228 (2005).10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.041Search in Google Scholar
[30] B. Tian and Y. T. Gao, Phys. Lett. A 362, 283 (2007).10.1016/j.physleta.2006.10.094Search in Google Scholar
[31] B. Tian and Y. T. Gao, Phys. Plasmas 12, 070703 (2005).10.1063/1.1950120Search in Google Scholar
[32] R. Hirota, The direct method in Soliton theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511543043Search in Google Scholar
©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Studying of the Nucleus-Nucleus Interaction Using Wave Function of the Nucleus and Hyperspherical Formalism
- Highly Accurate Compact Difference Scheme for SPL Heat Conduction Model of General Body
- Linear and Nonlinear Electrical Models of Neurons for Hopfield Neural Network
- Flow and Heat Transfer of Bingham Plastic Fluid over a Rotating Disk with Variable Thickness
- Boriding of Binary Ni–Ti Shape Memory Alloys
- The Wheeler–DeWitt Equation in Filćhenkov Model: The Lie Algebraic Approach
- Quasi-Exact Solutions for Generalised Interquark Interactions in a Two-Body Semi-Relativistic Framework
- Multi-Scale Morphological Analysis of Conductance Signals in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow
- Exact Solutions for a Coupled Korteweg–de Vries System
- Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
- Improving Charge Transport in PbS Quantum Dot to Al:ZnO Layer by Changing the Size of Quantum Dots in Hybrid Solar Cells
- Calculation of Liquid–Solid Interfacial Free Energy in Pb–Cu Binary Immiscible System
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Studying of the Nucleus-Nucleus Interaction Using Wave Function of the Nucleus and Hyperspherical Formalism
- Highly Accurate Compact Difference Scheme for SPL Heat Conduction Model of General Body
- Linear and Nonlinear Electrical Models of Neurons for Hopfield Neural Network
- Flow and Heat Transfer of Bingham Plastic Fluid over a Rotating Disk with Variable Thickness
- Boriding of Binary Ni–Ti Shape Memory Alloys
- The Wheeler–DeWitt Equation in Filćhenkov Model: The Lie Algebraic Approach
- Quasi-Exact Solutions for Generalised Interquark Interactions in a Two-Body Semi-Relativistic Framework
- Multi-Scale Morphological Analysis of Conductance Signals in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow
- Exact Solutions for a Coupled Korteweg–de Vries System
- Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
- Improving Charge Transport in PbS Quantum Dot to Al:ZnO Layer by Changing the Size of Quantum Dots in Hybrid Solar Cells
- Calculation of Liquid–Solid Interfacial Free Energy in Pb–Cu Binary Immiscible System