Abstract
In this article, based on the compatibility method, some nonclassical symmetries of Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation are derived. By solving the corresponding characteristic equations associated with symmetry equations, some new exact explicit solutions of Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation are obtained. For the exact explicit traveling wave solutions, the exact parametric representations are investigated by the integral bifurcation method.
1 Introduction
In 2010, Kudryashov and Sinelshchikov presented the following equation [1]:
where u is a density and which are the terms which model heat transfer and viscosity, α, β are real parameters. Equation (1) is called Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation and is for describing the pressure waves in a mixture liquid and gas bubbles taking into consideration the viscosity of liquid and the heat transfer, it is a generalisation of the KdV and the BKdV equation and similar but not identical to the Camassa–Holm equation. Equation (1) was studied by many researchers in various methods. Ryabov found four families of solitary of (1) when β=−3 or β=−4 by using a modification of the truncated expansion method [2]; Randrüüt obtained a kind of new periodic wave solution which is called meandering solution in a more straightforward manner [3]; Li et al. investigated bifurcations of travelling wave solutions of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation and proved the existence of the peakon, solitary waves, and smooth and nonsmooth periodic waves [4]. He et al. [5] investigated the periodic loop solutions and their limit forms. Different kinds of other exact solutions are obtained in [6], [7], [8]. In [9], Chen et al. studied travelling wave solutions of (1) in the special case β=2. Here, we will investigate the travelling wave solutions of (1) for the other special cases.
Our aim in this article is to perform the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation with the help of the compatibility method ([10], [11]) and the integral bifurcation method [9]. The remainder of this article is organized as follows: in Section 2, two types of nonclassical symmetries of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation (1) are presented. In Section 3, different types of symmetry reductions of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation (1) are obtained. In Section 4, some new exact explicit solutions that include travelling wave solutions and nontravelling wave solutions of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation (1) are derived from the reduced equations. In Section 5, some new exact travelling wave solutions of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation (1) are derived by integral bifurcation method. The last section is a short summary and discussion.
2 Symmetries of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
The main purpose of the compatibility method is to seek the nonclassical symmetry of (1) in the form
where a(x, t), b(x, t), and γ(x, t) are functions to be determined later by the compatibility of (1) and (2). Firstly, we can obtain the highest-order derivative term uxxx of (1) by substituting (2) into (1) as follows:
From the equality of ut in (1), we can get at the derivatives of (1) and (2) with respect to t. Then in terms of the equality of utt of (1) and (2), one can get
Substituting (2) and (3) into the expansion of (4) yields a polynomial of u and its derivatives. Setting all the coefficients of this polynomial to zero yields a set of differential equations with regard to unknown functions a, b, γ as following
Solving the above-mentioned system of differential equations, we can get the following results
Case 1
and the corresponding nonclassical symmetry of (1) expressed by
where β, C1, C2 and C3 are arbitrary constants.
Case 2
and the corresponding nonclassical symmetry of (1) expressed by
where α, β, C1, and C2 are arbitrary constants.
3 Symmetry Reductions for the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
In order to obtain the invariant transformation, we write the characteristic equation in the form
3.1 Symmetry Reductions for Case 1
The determining equations for similarity variables of σ1=0 are
here C1, C2, and C3 are arbitrary constants.
Case 3.1.1 let C1=C2=C3=0, solving the above system (8), we can obtain u as the following form
f=f(t) are similarity variables. Substituting (9) into (1), we get the reduced equation of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation as
Case 3.1.2 let C1=C3=0, C2≠0, solving the system (8), we can obtain u as the following form
where
Case 3.1.3 let C1=−1, C2=0, C3≠0, solving the system (8), we can obtain u as the following form
where
Case 3.1.4 let C1≠0 and C1≠−1, C2=C3=0, solving the system (8), we can obtain u as the following form
where
3.2 Symmetry Reductions for Case 2
The determining equations for similarity variables of σ2=0 are
here C1, C2 are arbitrary constants.
Case 3.2.1 let C1=C2=0, we obtain
Case 3.2.2 let C1=0 and C2≠0, by solving the system of (17), we obtain the following expression of u as
Substituting (19) into (1), the reduced nonlinear partial differential equation is derived as
Case 3.2.3 let C1≠0 and C2=0, we obtain the following expression of u by solving the system of (17)
Substituting (21) into (1), the reduced nonlinear partial differential equation is derived as same as (18).
4 Exact Explicit Solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
For Case 3.1.1, according to simple calculation, obviously we obtain the rational function solution of the reduced equation (10) as
where C is an arbitrary constant. Therefore, when α=0, we have the exact solution of (1) as follows
For Case 3.1.2, we will give the exact analytic solutions to the reduced equation (12) using the power series method ([12], [13]). Now, we seek a solution of (12) in a power series of the following form
Substituting (24) into (12), we have
From (25), comparing coefficients, we obtain (for n=0)
with arbitrary chosen A0≠0, A1 and A2, we have
and (for n=1)
Generally, for n≥1, in view of (25), we can get all the coefficients An(n≥0) of the power series (24) as follows
This implies that for (12), there exists a power series solutions (24). In addition, it is easy to prove that the convergence of the power series (24) with the coefficients given by (25–27), we can see [12], [13] and references cited therein. Thus, this power series solution is an exact analytic solution.
Hence, the power series solution of (12) can be written as
Thus, we can obtain that the power series solution of (1) as
here
Remark 1. For Case 3.1.3 and Case 3.1.4, we can obtain the exact analytic solution of the reduced equations (14) and (16) by using the power series method similarly, here we do not list them for simplicity.
For Case 3.2.1, suppose that the solution of the reduced equation (18) is in the form
and ϕ satisfies the equation
where ϕ=ϕ(ξ) and a0, a1, a2, A, B, C are constants to be determined later. Substituting (31) and (32) into (18), and equating the coefficients of like powers of ϕi, (i=0, 1, 2, …) to zero, which give rise to the system of algebraic equations to a0, a1, a2, A, B, C. With the aid of Maple, we obtain the following solutions
From (32) and (33), it is easy to see that ϕ(ξ)=Aξ+ C0, and C0 is an arbitrary constant. The solution of the reduced equation (18) is obviously obtained as
and the solution of (1) is expressed as
where ξ=x−αt, and a0, A, α, C0 are arbitrary constants.
For Case 3.2.2, suppose that the solution of the reduced equation (20) is in the form of (31) and ϕ satisfies (32) and a0, a1, a2, A, B, C are constants to be determined later. Substituting (31) and (32) into (20). Similar to Case 3.2.1, we obtain the following solutions
From (32) and (36), it is easy to see that ϕ′(ξ)=A+Bϕ, solving this first-order ordinary differential equation, we have
and the solution of (1) is expressed as
where ξ=x−αt−C2 ln t, and a0, A, B, α, and C0 are arbitrary constants.
5 Exact Travelling Wave Solutions of (1) by Integral Bifurcation Method
In this section, we consider travelling wave solutions of (1) with the special case β=1 by using the integral bifurcation method.
Substituting u(x, t)=1−f(ξ) with ξ=x−ct into (1) and integrating it once, we have
where “′” is the derivative with respect to ξ and g an integral constant.
Letting
Using the transformation dξ=2fdτ, it carries (41) into the Hamiltonian system
For β≠−2, −1, 0, system (40) and (41) have the same first integral
Taking β=1 and h=0, (42) can be rewritten as follow:
From (43) and the first equation of (41), we have
Denote that
Using (45−57), transformations dξ=2fdτ and u(x, t)=1−f(ξ) with ξ=x−ct, we can obtain the exact travelling wave solutions of (1) as follows:
Remark 2. For the cases β=−4, −3, we can obtain the travelling wave solutions of (1) similarly, we omit them here.
6 Conclusions
We have discussed the symmetry reductions and exact explicit solutions of the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation in this article. It is shown that (1) can be reduced to constant coefficients partial differential equations (10), (18), (20) and variable coefficients partial differential equations (12), (14), and (16) by the compatibility method. Furthermore, some new exact explicit solutions of (1) can be constructed by solving the reduced nonlinear partial differential equations, including travelling wave solutions and nontravelling wave solutions. At last, we also obtain some new exact explicit travelling wave solutions by using the integral bifurcation method.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 11361023
Award Identifier / Grant number: 11461022
Funding source: Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2014FA037
Funding source: Honghe University
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2015GG0207
Funding statement: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11361023 and No. 11461022) and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 2014FA037) and the Second Batch of Middle and Young Aged Academic Backbone of Honghe University (No. 2015GG0207).
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11361023 and No. 11461022) and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 2014FA037) and the Second Batch of Middle and Young Aged Academic Backbone of Honghe University (No. 2015GG0207).
References
[1] N. A. Kudryashov and D. I. Sinelshchikov, Phys. Lett. A 374, 2011 (2010).10.1016/j.physleta.2010.02.067Search in Google Scholar
[2] P. N. Ryabov, Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 3585 (2010).10.1016/j.amc.2010.09.003Search in Google Scholar
[3] M. Randrüüt, Phys. Lett. A 375, 3687 (2011).10.1016/j.physleta.2011.08.048Search in Google Scholar
[4] J. B. Li and G. R. Chen, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 22, 1250118 [19 pages] (2012).10.1142/S0218127412501180Search in Google Scholar
[5] B. He, Q. Meng, J. H. Zhang, and Y. Long, Math. Problem Eng. Article ID 320163, 10 pages, 2012.10.1155/2012/320163Search in Google Scholar
[6] M. Randrüüt and M. Braun, Phys. Lett. A 377, 1868 (2013).10.1016/j.physleta.2013.05.040Search in Google Scholar
[7] M. Randrüüt and M. Braun, Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 58, 206 (2014).10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.09.013Search in Google Scholar
[8] M. Mirzazadeh and M. Eslami, Nonlin. Anal. Model. contr. 17, 481 (2012).10.15388/NA.17.4.14052Search in Google Scholar
[9] C. Chen, W. G. Rui, and Y. Long, Math. Problem Eng. Article ID 456964, 10 pages, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[10] N. Liu, Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 4178 (2010).10.1016/j.amc.2010.10.034Search in Google Scholar
[11] Z. L. Yan, J. P. Zhou, X. Q. Liu, Appl. Math. Comput. 201, 333 (2008).10.1016/j.amc.2007.12.027Search in Google Scholar
[12] H. Z. Liu, J. B. Li, and Q. X. Zhang, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 228, 1 (2009).10.1016/j.cam.2008.06.009Search in Google Scholar
[13] H. Z. Liu and J. B. Li, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 257, 144 (2014).10.1016/j.cam.2013.08.022Search in Google Scholar
[14] F. Kangalgil and F. Ayaz, Phys. Lett. A 372, 1831 (2008).10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.045Search in Google Scholar
©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Studying of the Nucleus-Nucleus Interaction Using Wave Function of the Nucleus and Hyperspherical Formalism
- Highly Accurate Compact Difference Scheme for SPL Heat Conduction Model of General Body
- Linear and Nonlinear Electrical Models of Neurons for Hopfield Neural Network
- Flow and Heat Transfer of Bingham Plastic Fluid over a Rotating Disk with Variable Thickness
- Boriding of Binary Ni–Ti Shape Memory Alloys
- The Wheeler–DeWitt Equation in Filćhenkov Model: The Lie Algebraic Approach
- Quasi-Exact Solutions for Generalised Interquark Interactions in a Two-Body Semi-Relativistic Framework
- Multi-Scale Morphological Analysis of Conductance Signals in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow
- Exact Solutions for a Coupled Korteweg–de Vries System
- Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
- Improving Charge Transport in PbS Quantum Dot to Al:ZnO Layer by Changing the Size of Quantum Dots in Hybrid Solar Cells
- Calculation of Liquid–Solid Interfacial Free Energy in Pb–Cu Binary Immiscible System
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Studying of the Nucleus-Nucleus Interaction Using Wave Function of the Nucleus and Hyperspherical Formalism
- Highly Accurate Compact Difference Scheme for SPL Heat Conduction Model of General Body
- Linear and Nonlinear Electrical Models of Neurons for Hopfield Neural Network
- Flow and Heat Transfer of Bingham Plastic Fluid over a Rotating Disk with Variable Thickness
- Boriding of Binary Ni–Ti Shape Memory Alloys
- The Wheeler–DeWitt Equation in Filćhenkov Model: The Lie Algebraic Approach
- Quasi-Exact Solutions for Generalised Interquark Interactions in a Two-Body Semi-Relativistic Framework
- Multi-Scale Morphological Analysis of Conductance Signals in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow
- Exact Solutions for a Coupled Korteweg–de Vries System
- Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov Equation
- Improving Charge Transport in PbS Quantum Dot to Al:ZnO Layer by Changing the Size of Quantum Dots in Hybrid Solar Cells
- Calculation of Liquid–Solid Interfacial Free Energy in Pb–Cu Binary Immiscible System