Home Physical Sciences Nonlocal Symmetry and its Applications in Perturbed mKdV Equation
Article Publicly Available

Nonlocal Symmetry and its Applications in Perturbed mKdV Equation

  • Bo Ren EMAIL logo and Ji Lin
Published/Copyright: April 29, 2016

Abstract

Based on the modified direct method, the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation is changed to the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. The truncated Painlevé method is applied to obtain the nonlocal symmetry of the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. By introducing one new dependent variable, the nonlocal symmetry can be localized to the Lie point symmetry. Thanks to the localization procedure, the finite symmetry transformation is presented by solving the initial value problem of the prolonged systems. Furthermore, many explicit interaction solutions among different types of solutions such as solitary waves, rational solutions, and Painlevé II solutions are obtained using the symmetry reduction method to the enlarged systems. Two special concrete soliton-cnoidal interaction solutions are studied in both analytical and graphical ways.

1 Introduction

The mathematical theory of soliton collisions in the integrable models is a well developed field. Among these soliton collisions, multi-peakon, multi-soliton, multi-cuspon, and soliton-cuspon solutions have been widely investigated [16]. However, the interaction solutions among different types of nonlinear excitations are hardly studied. Recently, the localization procedure related with the nonlocal symmetry to find these types of interaction solutions has been proposed [710]. The method has been applied some constant-coefficient nonlinear systems [712]. In this article, we can use this method to variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. The model can describe both the plasma-sheath transition layer and the sheath inner layer [13]. The investigations on the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation is transformed to the constant-coefficient one by the modified direct method. The Painlevé method analysis is carried out on the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. The nonlocal symmetry of the equation is constructed. The finite symmetry transformation related with the nonlocal symmetry is obtained by solving the initial value problem of the Lie’s first principle. The interaction solutions among solitons and other complicated waves including the Painlevé waves, rational waves, and periodic cnoidal waves of the perturbed mKdV equation are derived by the symmetry reduction method. Those interaction solutions are difficult to obtain with other traditional methods, such as inverse scattering method [14], Darboux and Bäklund transformations [15, 16], Hirota’s bilinear method [17], and so on [1822].

The structure of this article is as follows. In Section 2, based on the modified direct method, the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation is changed to the the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. In Section 3, the nonlocal symmetry for the perturbed mKdV equation is obtained with the truncated Painlevé method. The finite symmetry transformation is given by localization of the nonlocal symmetry to the Lie point symmetry. In Section 4, the prolonged systems are investigated according to the Lie point symmetry theory. The interaction solutions are presented by the symmetry reductions. The last section is a short summary and discussion.

2 Modified Direct Method for Perturbed mKdV Equation

The modified direct method is a powerful and direct method to investigate the nonlinear equations [23, 24]. The expression of the finite transformations of the Lie groups is much simpler than those obtained via the standard approaches such as the classical Lie group approach [18], the nonclassical Lie group approach [25], and the Clarkson–Kruskal direct method [26]. In this section, we can perform the modified direct method to study the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation. Via the modified direct method, the investigations on the variable-coefficient perturbed equation can be based on the constant-coefficient one.

The variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation reads

(1)utuxxx+β2u2ux+6uux+h(t)ux=0, (1)

where β is arbitrary constant and h(t′) is an analytic function. It has been used to consider attention in many different physical fields including ocean dynamics [27], fluid mechanics [28], and plasma physics [13]. The multi-solitonic solutions in terms of the double Wronskian of (1) is obtained by the reducing technique [29].

Based on the modified direct method [23], the solution of (1) has a following form

(2)u=ν+μu(x,t), (2)

where ν, μ, x, and t are functions of x′ and t′. We assume that the field u satisfies the following constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation

(3)utuxxx+β2u2ux+6uux+ux=0. (3)

By substituting (2) into the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV system (1) and collecting the coefficients of u and its derivatives, we obtain

(4)ν=9δ1δ2β29β23β2,μ=3δ1δ29β2,x=3δ1(xh(t)dt)9β2+B2,t=B1+27β3(9β2)32t,δ12=1,δ22=1. (4)

where B1 and B2 are arbitrary constants.

Remark Once we obtain the solution of constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation (3), then the solution for the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation will be expressed as (2).

3 Nonlocal Symmetry and its Localization for Perturbed mKdV Equation

In this section, the Painlevé analysis is carried out the perturbed mKdV equation. The nonlocal symmetry and the finite symmetry transformation for the equation can be constructed by the Painlevé analysis.

According to the Painlevé test, one suppose u is [30]

(5)u=u0ϕ+u1, (5)

where the function ϕ is an arbitrary function defining the singular manifold by ϕ=0. By substituting of expansion (5) into (3) and vanishing the most dominant term, we obtain

(6)u0=±6βϕx. (6)

We proceed further and collect the coefficient of ϕ−3 to get

(7)u1=62βϕxxϕx3β2. (7)

Substituting the expressions (5), (6), and (7) into (1), one find the following Schwarzian perturbed mKdV form

(8)ϕtϕx+{ϕ;x}+9β2β2=0, (8)

where {ϕ;x}=x(ϕxxϕx)12(ϕxxϕx)2 is the Schwarzian derivative.

By the definition of residual symmetry (RS) [10], the nonlocal symmetry of the perturbed mKdV equation (1) reads out from the truncated Painlevé analysis (5)

(9)σu=±6βϕx. (9)

The nonlocal symmetry (9) can also be given using (8) and (7) [11, 12]. The Schwarzian form (8) is invariant under the Möbious group [30]

(10)ϕaϕ+bcϕ+d,acbd. (10)

It means that (8) possesses the symmetry

(11)σϕ=b+(a+b)ϕ+aϕ2, (11)

where the constants are d=1, c=–ϵ in (10). The nonlocal symmetry (9) will be obtained with substituting the Möbious transformation symmetry (11) into the symmetry equation of (7).

According to the Lie’s first principle, the initial value problem related with the nonlocal symmetry (9) reads

(12)du¯dϵ=±6βϕx,   u¯|ϵ=0=u. (12)

To solve the initial value problem (12), one can localize the nonlocal symmetry to the local Lie point symmetry for the prolonged systems (10). To eliminate the space derivative of field ϕ, the potential field is introduced

(13)ϕx=g. (13)

With the help of (5), we obtain an auto-Bäklund transformation of (3). u1 is also a solution of (3). It is easily verified that the solution of the symmetry equation for the prolonged systems (3), (7) and (13) gives

(14)σu=6gβ,   σϕ=ϕ2,   σg=2ϕg. (14)

The initial value problem (12) is correspondingly changed

(15a)du¯dϵ=6gβ,u¯|ϵ=0=u, (15a)
(15b)dϕ¯dϵ=ϕ2,ϕ¯|ϵ=0=ϕ, (15b)
(15c)dg¯dϵ=2ϕg,g¯|ϵ=0=g. (15c)

By solving the above initial value problem (3) for the enlarged perturbed mKdV systems, we get the following BT theorem.

Theorem 1 If u, ϕ and g are solutions of the enlarged perturbed mKdV systems (3), (7), and (13), then u̅, ϕ̅, and g̅ are also solutions of the enlarged perturbed mKdV systems

(16)u¯=u6ϵgβ(ϵϕ1),ϕ¯=ϕ1ϵϕ,g¯=g(1ϵϕ)2, (16)

where ϵ is an arbitrary group parameter.

4 Similarity Reductions Related with Nonlocal Symmetry

Thanks to the localization process, the nonlocal symmetry becomes the usual Lie point symmetry in the prolonged systems. The symmetry reduction related with the nonlocal symmetry can be performed by the Lie point symmetry method (18). These similar reduction solutions can not be obtained within the framework of the direct Lie’s symmetry method.

Based on the symmetry definition, the prolonged systems are invariance under the transformation

(17)uu+ϵσu,   ϕϕ+ϵσϕ,   gg+ϵσg, (17)

with the infinitesimal parameter ϵ. The corresponding Lie point symmetries σk (k=u, ϕ, g) are the solutions of the linearized prolonged systems (1), (7), and (13), (18)

(18a)σtuσxxxu+6(uσu)x+β2(u2σu)x+σxu=0, (18a)
(18b)σu62βσxxϕϕx+62βσxϕϕxxϕx2=0, (18b)
(18c)σxϕσg=0. (18c)

The symmetry components σk (k=u, ϕ, g) are supposed to have the forms

(19a)σu=Xux+TutU, (19a)
(19b)σϕ=Xϕx+TϕtΦ, (19b)
(19c)σg=Xgx+TgtG, (19c)

where X, T, U, Φ, and G are functions of x, t, u, ϕ, and g. Substituting (19) into the symmetry equation (18) and requiring u, ϕ, and g to satisfy the prolonged systems, we get the over-determined equations with collecting the coefficients of u, ϕ, g, and its derivatives. Solving the over-determining equations leads to the infinitesimals X, T, U, Φ, and G as

(20)X=C13x6C1β2t+2C13t+C4,  T=C1t+C2,   Φ=βC36ϕ2+C5ϕC6,G=6C3β3ϕgC13g+C5g,   U=C13u+C3gC1β2, (20)

where Ci (i=1 ··· 6) are arbitrary constants. The symmetry will degenerate to the usual Lie point symmetry of the original (3) with C3=0. The similarity solutions associated with the infinitesimal symmetries (20) can be given with the symmetry constraint condition σk=0 defined by (19). It is equivalent to solve the related characteristic equation

(21)dtT=dxX=duU=dϕΦ=dgG, (21)

where X, T, U Φ, and G satisfy (20). Three subcases are distinguished concerning the solutions in the following.

Case IC1≠0, C2≠0. We take the parameter Δ=66βC3C6+9C52 for simplicity. Two situations with Δ≠0 and Δ=0 are discussed, respectively.

When Δ≠0, the similarity solutions are the following forms after solving out the characteristic equation (21)

(22a)ϕ=Δ6C3βtanh(Δ6C1(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))C52βC3, (22a)
(22b)g=G(C1t+C2)13cosh2(Δ6C1(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2)), (22b)
(22c)u=U(C1t+C2)136C3Δ(C1t+C2)13Gtanh(Δ6C1(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))3(2C1tC2)8β2(C1t+C2), (22c)

where three group invariant functions Φ=Φ(ξ), G=G(ξ), and U=U(ξ) and the similarity variable

(23)ξ=9(C1t+3C2)C1β2(C1t+C2)13+C1x+3C4C1t3C2C1(C1t+C2)13. (23)

It is obvious that C1 cannot equal to zero for (23). The situation with C1=0 will be studied in case II. Substituting (22) into (7), (8), and (13), the invariant functions G, U, and Φ satisfy the reduction systems

(24a)G=6Δ236C3βΦξ, (24a)
(24b)U=62βΦξξΦξ9(2C1t+3C2)8β2(C1t+C2)23, (24b)

where Φ satisfies a three-order ordinary differential equation (ODE)

(25)18ΦξΦξξξΔ2Φξ4+6C1ξΦξ227Φξξ218Φξ=0, (25)

which is just the second Painlevé (PII) equation. Once one get the solution of Φ from (25), the explicit solution of (3) would be immediately obtained through (24) and (22). The following reduction theorem for the perturbed mKdV equation (1) can be obtained through above calculations.

Theorem 2 If Φ is a solution of the PII (25), then u given by

(26)u=Δ6β(C1t+C2)13Φξtanh(Δ6C1(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))62β(C1t+C2)13ΦξξΦξ3β2, (26)

is also a solution of the perturbed mKdV equation with ξ determined by (23). It is obvious that (26) can be considered as the interaction solution between the explicit solitary wave and the general Painlevé II wave. The generic solutions of PII (25) are transcendental. We can get the rational solutions and Bessel and Airy function solutions of PII at special values of the parameters in (25) (7). The rich interaction solutions for the perturbed mKdV equation (3) can be thus obtained through (26).

For the rational solution of (25), it has a solution

(27)Φ=ln(aξ3), (27)

where the constants in (25) should satisfy C1=1, Δ2=1. Then a rational solution of (3) is given using (26)

(28)u=6(2aXξ31)βXξ(aXξ3+1)3β2,   X=(C2+3t)13. (28)

When Δ=0, following the similar steps of the above case Δ≠0, the similarity solutions are

(29a)ϕ=6C52βC36C1βC3(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2)), (29a)
(29b)g=G(C1t+C2)13(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))2, (29b)
(29c)u=U(C1t+C2)13C3GC1(C1+C2)13(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))33β2, (29c)

where ξ=9(C1t+3C2)C1β2(C1t+C2)13C1(tx)+3(C2C4)C1(C1t+C2)13. Substituting (29) into (7), (8), and (13), the invariant functions Φ, G, and U satisfy the reduction systems

(30a)G=6C12βC3Φξ (30a)
(30b)U=62βΦξξΦξ, (30b)

where Φ satisfies an ODE

(31)6Φξ2C1ξΦξ26ΦξΦξξξ+9Φξξ2=0. (31)

In the same way, we can get the reduction theorem.

Theorem 3 If Φ satisfies a special PII (31), the explicit solution of perturbed mKdV equation is provided as

(32)u=62β(C1t+C2)13ΦξξΦξ6C1β(C1t+C2)13Φξ(C1Φ+ln(C1t+C2))3β2. (32)

It is obvious that the solution (32) of the perturbed mKdV equation represents the interaction between a logarithm of singularity ln(C1t+C2)13 and a Painlevé II wave.

Case IIC1=0, C2≠0. We also redefine the parameter Δ=66βC3C6+9C52 for facilitating the later computation. Two situations with Δ≠0 and Δ=0 are given, respectively.

When Δ≠0, similar procedure as case I, the similarity solutions are given after solving out the characteristic equations (21)

(33a)ϕ=Δ6βC3tanh(Δ6C2(Φ+t))3C56βC3, (33a)
(33b)g=Gcosh2(Δ6C2(Φ+t)), (33b)
(33c)u=U6C3ΔGtanh(Δ6C2(Φ+t)). (33c)

where ξ=xC4C2t. Similar as above case, we will discuss the situation with C1=C2=0 in case III. The reduction systems present as

(34a)G=6Δ236βC2C3Φξ (34a)
(34b)U=62βΦξξΦξ3β2, (34b)

where Φ′ satisfies the following ODE

(35)Φξ+(19β2C4C2)Φξ2ΦξΦξξξ+32Φξξ2+Δ218C22Φξ4=0. (35)

The general solution of (35) can be solved out in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions (11).

Theorem 4 Once one get the solution of Φ′ for (35), the explicit solution of the perturbed mKdV equation will be read as

(36)u=62βΦξξΦξΔ6βC2Φξtanh(Δ6C2(Φ+t))3β2. (36)

This type of the solution (36) is just the explicit interactions between one soliton and cnoidal periodic waves. To show more clearly of this kind of solution, we give two special cases. Type 1. The special solution for the reduction (35) is

(37)Φ=k1ξ+a1Eπ(sn(kξ,m),n,m), (37)

where k1, a1, k, n, and m are constants and Eπ is the third incomplete elliptic integral. Using the theorem (4), the special soliton-cnoidal wave interaction solution u for (3) can be expressed by Jacobi elliptic functions

(38)u=Δ(nk1S2a1kk1)6C2β(1nS2)T+6na1k2SCDβ(nS21)(nk1S2a1kk1)3β2 (38)

where S=sn(, m), C=cn(, m), D=dn(, m), T=tanh(a1Δ6C2Eπ(S,n,m)+Δk16C2ξ). Substituting (37) into (35) and vanishing all the coefficients of different powers of sn, the nontrivial solution for constants are

(39)a1=k1(n1)k,   C4=C2+2C2k29C2β2+C22k1+C2nk1,m=k13n3(4k2k1nn+1)2kk12n2,   Δ=3k1β2C22(4k2nk1+1)nβk12. (39)

Finally, the solution of the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation (1) can be obtained using the symmetry group theorem (2). Figure 1 exhibits the special type of one kink soliton in the periodic wave background for the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation (1). The parameters are n=0.5, k1=–1, k=1, C2=2, β=2, δ1=–1, δ2=–1, B1=1, B2=2, h(t′)=cos(t′). Figure 1a plots the solution (38) with a time-sliced view at t=0. Figure 1b is the corresponding three-dimensional image.

Figure 1: Plot of one kink soliton in the periodic wave background. The parameters are n=0.5, k1=–1, k=1, C2=2, β=2, δ1=–1, δ2=–1, B1=1, B2=2, h(t′)=cos(t′). (a) One-dimensional image at t=0. (b) The corresponding three-dimensional view.
Figure 1:

Plot of one kink soliton in the periodic wave background. The parameters are n=0.5, k1=–1, k=1, C2=2, β=2, δ1=–1, δ2=–1, B1=1, B2=2, h(t′)=cos(t′). (a) One-dimensional image at t=0. (b) The corresponding three-dimensional view.

Type 2. Another special solution for the reduction equation (35) is

(40)Φ=a0ξ+a1ln(dn(kξ,m)mcn(kξ,m)), (40)

where a0, a1, k, and m are constants. The corresponding special soliton-cnoidal wave interaction solution u for (3) is given

(41)u=Δ(kma1Sa0)2βC2Ta1mk2CD2β(kma1S+a0)+α12β2 (41)

where S=sn(, m), C=cn(, m), D=dn(, m), T=tanh(a1Δ2C2ln(DmC)+Δa06C2ξ+Δ6C2t). Substituting (40) into (35), vanishing all the coefficients of different powers of sn leads to the nontrivial solution for constants

(42)a1=a02a0(m21)m,  C2=4a0C4β2(m21)4a0β2m2+5β2m24a0β236a0m2β2+36a0,k=12a0(m21),   Δ=6C4β2m2(m21)a0(4a0β2m2+5β2m24a0β236a0m2β2+36a0). (42)

When Δ=0, the interaction solution of perturbed mKdV equation can be given similar as Δ≠0. The following reduction theorem is obtained by omitting the tedious calculations.

Theorem 5 If the solution Φ′ satisfies a elliptic function equation

(43)2ΦξξξΦξ2Φξ3Φξξ2+(2C4C2+18β22)Φξ2=0. (43)

The explicit solution of perturbed mKdV equation expresses as

(44)u=6βΦξΦ+t+62βΦξξΦξ3β2, (44)

where ξ=xC4C2t. Hence, this type of the solution (44) is just interactions among cnoidal periodic waves and rational waves for the perturbed mKdV equation. A nontrivial solution by Jacobi elliptic functions reads as

(45)Φ=k1ξ+a1Eπ(sn(kξ,m),n,m), (45)

where k1, a1, k, n, and m are constants and Eπ is the third incomplete elliptic integrals. The constants are

(46)k1=14k2m2,   a1=14k3m2,   C2=C4β24β2k2m22β2k2+β29,   n=m2, (46)

then (45) is a solution of (43).

Case IIIC1=C2=0. The similarity solutions are given

(47a)ϕ=46βC3C6+6C522βC3tanh(66βC3C6+9C526C4(Φ(t)+x))6C52βC3, (47a)
(47b)g=G(t)cosh2(66βC3C6+9C526C4(Φ(t)+x)), (47b)
(47c)u=U(t)6C366βC3C6+9C52G(t)tanh(66βC3C6+9C526C4(Φ(t)+x)). (47c)

Substituting (47) into (7), (8), and (13), the invariant functions Φ″(t), G″(t), and U″(t) satisfy the reduction systems

(48a)G=C6C4+6C524βC3C4 (48a)
(48b)U=3β2, (48b)

where Φ″ satisfies

(49)Φt=9β2C522C426βC3C63C421, (49)

From above the detail calculations, one get the following reduction theorem.

Theorem 6 If Φ″ is a solution of the reduction equation (49), then the explicit solution for the perturbed mKdV equation reads

(50)u=46βC3C6+6C522β2C4tanh(66βC3C6+9C526C4(Φ(t)+x))3β2. (50)

Remark Though we study the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation (3) by the reduction method, the interaction solutions of the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation (1) can be obtained through the reduction theorem and symmetry group theorem (2).

5 Conclusions

We have changed the variable-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation to the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation by the modified direct method. We obtain the nonlocal symmetry of the constant-coefficient perturbed mKdV equation by the truncated Painlevé analysis or the Möbious invariant form. To solve the first Lie’s principle related by nonlocal symmetry, the nonlocal symmetry is localized the local Lie point symmetries for the prolonged system. We have also carried out a detailed invariance analysis of the prolonged systems. A variety of exact explicit interaction solutions among solitons and the rational solution hierarchy, Painlevé II waves, and cnoidal waves are obtained based on the nonlocal symmetry. The most interesting and meaningful solution among them is the interaction between soliton and cnoidal wave solution. We study this type interaction solution both in analytical and graphical ways.

Furthermore, the interaction solutions among different types of excitations for the perturbed mKdV equation can be explored with a consistent Riccati expansion method [31, 32]. For the perturbed mKdV equation (1), we may take the term h(t)ux as the perturbation form. One can develop the approximate symmetry reduction approach [33] to explore the perturbed mKdV equation (1). Recently, the integrable continuous and discrete nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equations with PT (parity-time) symmetry invariant are proposed [3436]. The details on the interaction solutions for these nonlocal models are worthy of further study.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11305106

Funding statement: This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (Nos. LZ15A050001), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11305106.

Acknowledgments:

This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (Nos. LZ15A050001), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11305106.

References

[1] R. Beals, D. H. Sattinger, and J. Szmigielski, Inverse Probl. 15, L1 (1999).10.1088/0266-5611/15/1/001Search in Google Scholar

[2] H. H. Dai and Y. Li, J. Phys. A 38, L685 (2005).10.1088/0305-4470/38/42/L04Search in Google Scholar

[3] H. H. Dai, Y. Li, and T. Su, J. Phys. A 42, 055203 (2009).10.1088/1751-8113/42/5/055203Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. C. Ferreira, R. A. Kraenkel, and A. I. Zenchuk, J. Phys. A 32, 8665 (1999).10.1088/0305-4470/32/49/307Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Matsuno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1983 (2005).10.1143/JPSJ.74.1983Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Parker, Chaos Soliton Fract. 41, 1531 (2009).10.1016/j.chaos.2008.06.023Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. R. Hu, S. Y. Lou, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 85, 056607 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevE.85.056607Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] X. P. Chen, S. Y. Lou, C. L. Chen, and X. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. E 89, 043202 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevE.89.043202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] S. Y. Lou, X. R. Hu, and Y. Chen, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 155209 (2012).10.1088/1751-8113/45/15/155209Search in Google Scholar

[10] X. N. Gao, S. Y. Lou, and X. Y. Tang, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 029 (2013).10.1007/JHEP05(2013)029Search in Google Scholar

[11] B. Ren, Phys. Scr. 90, 065206 (2015).10.1088/0031-8949/90/6/065206Search in Google Scholar

[12] W. G. Cheng, B. Li, and Y. Chen, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 29, 198 (2015).10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. L. Liu and M. Slemrod, Appl. Math. Lett. 17, 401 (2004).10.1016/S0893-9659(04)90081-XSearch in Google Scholar

[14] C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967).10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1095Search in Google Scholar

[15] V. B. Matveev and M. A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons, Springer, Berlin 1991.10.1007/978-3-662-00922-2Search in Google Scholar

[16] C. Rogers and W. K. Schief, Bäcklund and Darboux Transformations Geometry and Modern Applications in Soliton Theory, Cambridge texts in applied mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511606359Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Hirota, The direct Method in Soliton Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511543043Search in Google Scholar

[18] P. J. Olver, Application of Lie Group to Differential Equation, Springer, Berlin 1986.10.1007/978-1-4684-0274-2Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. W. Bluman, A. F. Cheviakov, and S. C. Anco, Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York 2010.10.1007/978-0-387-68028-6Search in Google Scholar

[20] X. Y. Tang, S. Y. Lou, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046601 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046601Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] X. Lü, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 19, 3969 (2014).10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.03.013Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 184, 1002 (2007).10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. Y. Lou and H. C. Ma, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, L129 (2005).10.1088/0305-4470/38/7/L04Search in Google Scholar

[24] B. Ren, X. J. Xu, and J. Lin, J. Math. Phys. 50, 123505 (2009).10.1063/1.3268588Search in Google Scholar

[25] G. W. Bluman and J. D. Cole, J. Math. Mech. 18, 1025 (1969).10.1512/iumj.1969.18.18074Search in Google Scholar

[26] P. A. Clarkson and M. Kruskal, J. Math. Phys. 30, 2201 (1989).10.1063/1.528613Search in Google Scholar

[27] V. Djordjevic and L. Redekopp, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 8, 1016 (1978).10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<1016:TFADOI>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. A. Malomed and V. I. Shrira, Physica D 53, 1 (1991).10.1016/0167-2789(91)90159-7Search in Google Scholar

[29] L. Wang, Y. T. Gao, and F. H. Qi Ann. Phys. 327, 1974 (2012).10.1016/j.aop.2012.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. Weiss, M. Tabor, and G. Carnevale, J. Math. Phys. 24, 522 (1983).10.1063/1.525721Search in Google Scholar

[31] S. Y. Lou, Stud. Appl. Math. 134, 372 (2015).10.1111/sapm.12072Search in Google Scholar

[32] B. Ren and J. Lin, Z. Naturforsch. 70a, 539 (2015).10.1515/zna-2015-0085Search in Google Scholar

[33] X. Y. Jiao, R. X. Yao, and S. Y. Lou, J. Math. Phys. 49, 093505 (2008).10.1063/1.2976034Search in Google Scholar

[34] M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 064105 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.064105Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Phys. Rev. E 90, 032912 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032912Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Nonlinearity 29, 915 (2016).10.1088/0951-7715/29/3/915Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-2-29
Accepted: 2016-3-31
Published Online: 2016-4-29
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 19.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2016-0078/html
Scroll to top button