Startseite Nonclassical Symmetry Analysis of Heated Two-Dimensional Flow Problems
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Nonclassical Symmetry Analysis of Heated Two-Dimensional Flow Problems

  • Imran Naeem ORCID logo , Rehana Naz EMAIL logo und Muhammad Danish Khan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. November 2015

Abstract

This article analyses the nonclassical symmetries and group invariant solution of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flows. First, we derive the nonclassical symmetry determining equations with the aid of the computer package SADE. We solve these equations directly to obtain nonclassical symmetries. We follow standard procedure of computing nonclassical symmetries and consider two different scenarios, ξ1≠0 and ξ1=0, ξ2≠0. Several nonclassical symmetries are reported for both scenarios. Furthermore, numerous group invariant solutions for nonclassical symmetries are derived. The similarity variables associated with each nonclassical symmetry are computed. The similarity variables reduce the system of partial differential equations (PDEs) to a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in terms of similarity variables. The reduced system of ODEs are solved to obtain group invariant solution for governing boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flow problems. We successfully formulate a physical problem of heat transfer analysis for fluid flow over a linearly stretching porous plat and, with suitable boundary conditions, we solve this problem.

1 Introduction

Prandtl [1] derived the boundary layer equations by simplifying the Navier–Stokes equations. Schlichting [2, 3] developed boundary layer equations for two-dimensional flow. The problem of the radial laminar heated free jet was studied by Schwarz [4] and later by Naz et al. [5]. The similarity solutions and conserved quantities were established. The boundary layer equations are usually solved subject to certain initial and boundary conditions to describe flow in jets, films, fractures, and plates. Each jet flow problem has a conserved quantity, and that is a measure of the strength of the jet. Naz et al. [6] developed a new method to establish conserved quantities for different types of jet flow problems. Three different types of jets widely studied in literature are the liquid jet, free jet and wall jet. The boundary conditions and conserved quantities for each jet flow problem are different, but the governing partial differential equation is the same for all these jets.

The exact solutions of nonlinear PDEs are derived by classical and nonclassical methods. Bluman and Cole developed nonclassical method to construct nonclassical symmetries for PDEs and assumed that the required analytical solution is invariant under symmetry transformations preserving both the form of the differential equation and the invariant solution condition [7]. This is an elegant approach and yields more symmetries than the Lie classical approach. The direct method from Clarkson and Kruskal [8] is adopted by many researchers to construct nonclassical symmetries and new solutions for PDEs. For a scalar equation, the direct method and the nonclassical method yield the same number of reductions (see Olver [9]). Bila and Niesen [10] proposed a new procedure for finding nonclassical symmetries, but this method is applicable to a specific class of PDEs. Bruzon and Gandarias [11] modified this new procedure to find nonclassical symmetries and reported a new nonclassical symmetry for the shallow water wave equation. One can obtain determining equations for nonclassical symmetries by some powerful computer packages (see e.g. [12, 13]). Filho and Figueiredo [13] developed a computer package SADE on Maple for calculating the determining equations and nonclassical symmetries. SADE is based on the nonclassical method developed by Bluman and Cole [7]. The method adopted in this article is the nonclassical method. The Maple-based computer package SADE is utilised to derive the determining equations for nonclassical symmetries, and the solution of determining equations yield a number of nonclassical symmetries. The group invariant solutions of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flow problems are established by these nonclassical symmetries.

The Lie classical symmetry analysis for jet flow problems is studied in the literature up to this point. The group invariant solutions for boundary layer equations are constructed by the Lie classical symmetries. Naz et al. [14] studied the nonclassical symmetries of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional and radial flows. A new group invariant solution was obtained by utilising the nonclassical symmetries. In Ludlow et al. [15], the similarity solutions of the unsteady incompressible boundary-layer equations were established by direct method. The similarity reductions of the steady-state boundary layer equations were studied by Brude [16]. The similarity solutions of the steady two-dimensional boundary-layer equations in the flat and axisymmetric case are indeed invariant solutions under the action of nonclassical symmetries by Saccomandi [17] . In this article, we consider nonclassical symmetry analysis for two-dimensional heated flows and obtain a number of new solutions. This artile adds to the literature in three ways. First, we derive the nonclassical symmetries for the two-dimensional heated flows. This analysis will help to explore new problems in jets, films, fractures, and plates by imposing suitable conditions and physical conserved quantities. We obtain the solution of determining equations for nonclassical symmetries directly without using SADE. It is a tedious job to compute nonclassical symmetries. Second, we have derived a number of group invariant solutions for boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flows via nonclassical symmetries. Third, we have successfully formulated a physical problem of heat transfer analysis for fluid flow over a linearly stretching porous plat and, with suitable boundary conditions, we solved this problem.

This article is organised in the following manner. In Section 2 the nonclassical symmetries of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional flows is presented. The group invariant solutions of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional flows are given in Section 3. In Section 4, heat transfer analysis for fluid flow over a linearly stretching porous plate is studied via nonclassical symmetry analysis. Finally, conclusions are summarised in Section 5.

2 Nonclassical Symmetries of Boundary Layer Equations for Two-Dimensional Heated Flows

The two-dimensional heated flow problems are represented by the following boundary layer equations:

(1)ψyψxyψxψyyψyyy=0,ψyTxψxTyTyy=0. (1)

Here (x, y) denotes the usual orthogonal cartesian coordinates parallel and perpendicular to the boundary y=0, T is temperature, and ψ the stream function. The velocity components in the x and y directions are u(x, y) and v(x, y), respectively. The velocity components are related to stream function ψ as

(2)u=ψy,v=ψx. (2)

Consider the infinitesimal operator

(3)X=ξ1(x,y,ψ,T)x+ξ2(x,y,ψ,T)y+η1(x,y,ψ,T)ψ+η2(x,y,ψ,T)T. (3)

The system (1) can be rewritten as

(4)Δ1=ψyψxyψxψyyψyyy=0,Δ2=ψyTxψxTyTyy=0. (4)

The invariant surface conditions are

(5)Δ3=ξ1ψx+ξ2ψyη1=0,Δ4=ξ1Tx+ξ2Tyη2=0. (5)

The nonclassical symmetries determining equations are (see e.g. [7])

(6)X[3]Δ1|Δ1=0,Δ2=0,Δ3=0,Δ4=0=0,X[3]Δ2|Δ1=0,Δ2=0,Δ3=0,Δ4=0=0,X[1]Δ3|Δ1=0,Δ2=0,Δ3=0,Δ4=0=0,X[1]Δ4|Δ1=0,Δ2=0,Δ3=0,Δ4=0=0, (6)

where X[1] and X[3] are the usual first and third prolongations of operator X and can be computed from

(7)X[k]=ξi(x,u)xi+ηα(x,u)uα+ζiα(x,u,u(1))uiα++ζi1ikα(x,u,,u(k))ui1ikα, (7)

where ζi1,i2,,isα can be determined from

ζiα=Di(ηα)ujαDi(ξj)ζi1,i2,,isα=Dis(ζi1,i2,,is1α)uji1,i2,,is1αDis(ξj),  s>1,

in which

(8)Di=xi+uiαuα+uijαujα+ (8)

is the total derivative operator with respect to xi. The standard procedure for deriving nonclassical symmetries is to consider following two scenarios: Scenario 1: ξ1≠0 and Scenario 2: ξ1=0, ξ2≠0.

2.1 Scenario 1: ξ1≠0

In this case, we set ξ1=1. The determining equations are calculated by SADE, and two equations of form η1ξT2=0,η2ξT2=0 arise. We consider following two cases: Case I: ξT2=0and Case II: ξT2=0.

2.1.1 Case I: ξT2=0

If ξT2=0, then η1=0, η2=0 and following determining equations are obtained:

(9)ξu2=0,ξTT2=0,ξyT2=0,ξyy2=0,ξT2ξy2+ξxT2=0,(ξy2)2+ξxy2=0. (9)

The solution of determining in (9) yield the following nonclassical symmetry generators:

(10)X1=x+1x[T+y+xF(x)]y, (10)
(11)X2=x+[T+F(x)]y. (11)

We obtain two nonclassical symmetries if ξT2=0.

2.1.2 Case II: ξT2=0

If ξT2=0 then we have following system of determining equations for computation of nonclassical symmetry generators:

(12)ξu2=0,ξT2=0,ηT1=0,ηuu1=0,ηyyy1(ηy1)2+η1ηyy1=0,3ξyy23ηyu1η1ξy2ηu1η1ηx1ηy1ξ2=0,ξyyy23ηyyu1+η1ξyy2+ξ2ηyy1+ηxy1η1ηyu1+2ηu1ηy1=0,ηxu1(ξy2)2ξxy2+ξ2ηyu1ξ2ξyy2+(ηu1)2=0,ηu2=0,ηTT2=0,η2ηy1η1ηy2ηyy2=0,η2ξy2+ηx2+ξ2ηy2+η2ηu1=0,ξyy2ηx1ξ2ηy12ηyT2η1ηu1η1ξy2=0. (12)

The solution of determining in (12) yield all classical symmetries and four sets of solutions for the nonclassical symmetry generators.

Case IIa

The first solution yields the nonclassical symmetry generator

(13)X3=x+F1(x)y+F2(x,y)ψ, (13)

where F1(x), F2(x, y) satisfy

(14)F2x+F2yF1(x)=0,F2yyy(F2y)2+F2F2yy=0. (14)

It is worthy to notice here that (14) admits a solution

(15)F1(x)=p(x),F2(x,y)=6yp(x). (15)

With the aid of these specific forms of F1(x) and F2(x, y), nonclassical symmetry X3 takes the following form:

(16)X3=x+p(x)y+6yp(x)ψ. (16)

Case IIb

The second solution gives rise to the nonclassical symmetry generator

(17)X4=x+F1(x)y+F2(x,y)ψ+F3(x,y)T (17)

where F1(x), F2(x, y), F3(x, y) satisfy

(18)F3x+F3yF1(x)=0F2x+F2yF1(x)=0,F3yyF3F2y+F2F3y=0,F2yyy(F2y)2+F2F2yy=0. (18)

The nonclassical symmetry X4 contains the three arbitrary functions F1(x), F2(x, y), and F3(x, y) which satisfies (18). One solution of system (18) for F1(x), F2(x, y), and F3(x, y) is given by

(19)F1(x)=p(x),  F2(x,y)=6yp(x),F3(x,y)=c2(yp(x))2+c1(yp(x))3. (19)

Case IIc

The third solution results in the nonclassical symmetry generator

(20)X5=x+1x[y+xF4(x)]y1xψ+1x[T+xF5(x)+xF6(x)eyx]T, (20)

where F4(x), F5(x), and F6(x) satisfy

(21)F5(x)+xF5(x)+[F6(x)+xF6(x)+F4(x)F6(x)]eyx=0. (21)

Equation (21) on separation with respect to eyx gives

(22)xF5(x)+F5(x)=0,xF6(x)+(1+F4(x))F6(x)=0. (22)

The nonclassical symmetry X5 consists of the three arbitrary functions F4(x), F5(x), and F6(x), which satisfies (22). The solution of (22) for F5(x) and F6(x) is given by

(23)F5(x)=c2x,  F6(x)=c1e1+F4(x)xdx. (23)

Case IId

The fourth solution yields the nonclassical symmetry generator

(24)X6=x+F4(x)yψ+[T+F5(x)+F6(x)ey]T, (24)

where F4(x), F5(x), and F6(x) satisfy

(25)F5(x)=0,F6(x)+F4(x)F6(x)=0. (25)

The nonclassical symmetry X6 involves three arbitrary functions F4(x), F5(x) and F6(x) satisfying (25). The solution of (25) for F5(x) and F6(x) is of the following form:

(26)F5(x)=c1,F6(x)=c2eF4(x)dx. (26)

2.2 Scenario 2: ξ1=0, ξ2=1

The nonclassical symmetries for this case are

(27)X7=y+F(x,ψ,T)ψ, (27)
(28)X8=y+F(x,y,ψ,T)T, (28)
(29)X9=y+G(x,ψ,T)ψ+F(x,y,ψ,T)T. (29)

There are two more symmetries in this case; however, the arbitrary functions are too complex as they satisfy numerous equations.

3 Group Invariant Solutions of Boundary Layer Equations for Two-Dimensional Heated Flows

In this section we construct the group invariant solutions of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flows for both Scenarios 1 and 2. When ξ1≠0, we fix ξ1=1 and obtain six nonclassical symmetry generators X1, …, X6. For the case ξ1=0, ξ2=1, we derive three nonclassical symmetry generators X7, X8, and X9. We set F(x, y, ψ, T)=ex+y and G(x, ψ, T)=T in X9 in order to derive group invariant solutions using symmetries X7, X8, and X9. The similarity variables, reduced forms, and group invariant solutions of system (1) for both scenarios are presented in Table 1. The complete details of the method of how to construct a group invariant solution is provided in next section.

Now the question arises, what is the significance of derived group invariant solutions? It would be of interest to identify what type of physical phenomena can be associated with the solutions derived via nonclassical symmetry analysis. This analysis could help to explore new problems in jets, films, fractures, and plates by imposing suitable conditions and physical conserved quantities. With suitable boundary conditions the solution of system (1) derived via nonclassical symmetry X3 can be utilised to describe flow over a heated porous plate.

Table 1

Group invariant solutions and reduced forms of system (1).

Group invariant solutionReduced system and final solution
X1, ψ=A(r)Ar2+Arrr=0,Brr=0
T=B(r)ψ(r)=c3+RootOf(±3(Z16f3+3c1df)+r+c2)dr
r=yxAxF(x)xdxT(r)=c3r+c4
X2, ψ=A(r)Arrr=0, Brr=0
T=B(r)ψ(r)=c1+c2r+12c3r2
r=y+xAF(x)dxT(r)=c4r+c5
X3,ψ=A(r)+6xr6Ar+6rArr+r2Arrr=0, 6Br+rBrr=0
T=B(r)ψ(r)=c1+c2r+c3r2+6xr
r=yp(x)T(r)=c4+c5r5
X46Ar+6rArr+r2Arrr=0
ψ=A(r)+6xrc2rAr+c1Ar−6r2Brr3Brr=0
T=x(c1r3+c2r2)+B(r)ψ(r)=c3+c4r+c5r2+6xr
r=yp(x)T(r)=x(c1r3+c2r2)c5(c12c2)6r3c65r5c4(c1c2)6r2c1c34r+c7
X5Ar2Arr+Arrr=0
ψ=A(r)−ln(x)BArBr+Brr=0
T=c2+c1er+B(r)x
r=yxF4(x)xdx
X6ArrArrr=0
ψ=A(r)−xBArBr+Brr=0
T=c1+c2er+B(r)e+xψ(r)=c3+c4r+c5erx
r=yF4(x)dxT(r)=c1+c2er+c6exer2BesselJ(14c4,2c5er2)+c7exer2BesselY(14c4,2c5er2)
X7Ar=−1, Br=0
ψ=A(r)−ex+yψ(x, y)=−x+c1+ex+y
T=B(r), r=xT(x, y)=c2
X8Ar=−1, Br=0
ψ=(r)+ex+yψ(x, y)=−x+c1+ex+y
T=B(r)+ex+y, r=xT(x, y)=c2+ex+y
X9Ar=−1, Br=0
ψ=A(r)+(x+y)B(r)+ex+yψ(x, y)=−x+c1+(x+y)c2+ex+y
T=B(r)+ex+y, r=xT(x, y)=c2+ex+y

4 Heat Transfer Analysis for Fluid Flow Over a Linearly Stretching Porous Plate

Consider an incompressible flow of viscous two dimensional flow over a porous plate. Assume that plate is along x-axis and y-axis is perpendicular to the plate. The plate is moving with stretching velocity u=ax. Moreover the plate is also porous having velocity v=b (or we can take v=−b) and fluid above the plate is at rest. A constant temperature T0 is applied to the moving plate while the temperature of the fluid is taken as T. The governing equations for this two dimensional fluid flow in terms of stream function ψ and temperature T are given by (1). The fluid flow over a linearly stretching porous plate is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Flow over a linearly stretching porous plate.
Figure 1:

Flow over a linearly stretching porous plate.

The boundary conditions for this problem are given by

(30)y=0:ψy(x,0)=ax,ψx(x,0)=b,T(x,0)=T0,y=:ψ(x,)=0,ψy(x,)=0,T(x,)=T. (30)

Now, ψ=ϕ(x, y) and T=γ(x, y) are group invariant solutions of the system (1) if

(31)X(ψϕ(x,y))|ψ=ϕ=0,X(Tγ(x,y))|T=γ=0, (31)

where the operator X is given in (16) . The solution of (31) for u=U(x, y) is of the form

(32)ψ=A(r)+6xrT=B(r),r=yp(x). (32)

Now, substitution of (32) into system (1) yields system of following two ODEs:

(33)6Ar+6rArr+r2Arrr=0,6Br+rBrr=0. (33)

The solution of (33) gives

(34)A(r)=c1+c2r+c3r2,B(r)=c4+c5r5. (34)

Substituting A(r) and B(r) from (34) into (32), one can obtain solution as given in Table 1. Now, we find a solution subject to boundary conditions (30). The boundary conditions (30) yield p(x)=p0,b=6p0,6a+b2=0 and following conditions are obtained:

(35)A(p0)=0,A()=0,A()=0,B(p0)=T0,B()=T. (35)

The boundary conditions (35) provides

(36)c1=0,c2=0,c3=0,c4=T,c5=p05(TT0). (36)

The group invariant solution (32) with the aid of (34) and (36) takes following form:

(37)ψ(x,y)=6xyp0,T(x,y)=T+(TT0)p05(yp0)5, (37)

where p0=6b and the solution is valid under restriction 6a+b2=0. The velocity components are given by

(38)u(x,y)=6x(yp0)2,v(x,y)=6yp0. (38)

According to the best of our knowledge, the solution (37) is new and not reported in literature before.

5 Conclusions

The nonclassical symmetries of boundary layer equations for two-dimensional heated flows were computed by computer package SADE. First we derived the nonclassical symmetry determining equations by SADE. We solved these equations directly to obtain nonclassical symmetries. The nonclassical symmetries were computed for two different scenarios, ξ1≠0 and ξ1=0, ξ2≠0. We obtained six nonclassical symmetry generators for Scenario 1. The nonclassical symmetry generators X1 and X2 contain arbitrary functions. For Scenario 2, ξ1=0, ξ2≠0, five nonclassical symmetries involving arbitrary functions were established. We explicitly mentioned three nonclassical symmetries, X7, X8, and X9. The two additional nonclassical symmetries in this case were not explicitly given, as the arbitrary functions are too complex. Furthermore, the group invariant solutions by utilising the nonclassical symmetries were derived. We introduced similarity variables associated with each nonclassical symmetry. The variables reduced the system of PDEs to a system of ODEs in terms of similarity variables. The reduced ODEs were solved to obtain group invariant solution for boundary layer equations governing flow in two-dimensional heated flow problems. It is of interest to identify what type of physical phenomena can be associated with the solutions derived via nonclassical symmetry. We successfully formulated a physical problem of heat transfer analysis for fluid flow over a linearly stretching porous plate.


Corresponding author: Rehana Naz, Centre for Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore 53200, Pakistan, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

[1] L. Prandtl, About Liquid Movement at Very Low Friction, 3rd ed. Proceedings International Congress of Mathematicians, Heidelberg, 1904, p. 484 (in German).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] H. Schlichting, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 13, 260 (1933).10.1002/zamm.19330130403Suche in Google Scholar

[3] H. Schlichting, Boundary Layer Theory, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York 1968, p. 170.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] W. H. Schwarz, Chem. Eng. Sci. 18, 779 (1963).10.1016/0009-2509(63)85045-9Suche in Google Scholar

[5] R. Naz and D. P. Mason, J. Non. Math. Phy. 16, 299 (2009).10.1142/S1402925109000248Suche in Google Scholar

[6] R. Naz, D. P. Mason, and F. M. Mahomed, J. Nonlinear Anal. B: Real World Appl. 10, 2641 (2009).10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

[7] G. W. Bluman and J. D. Cole, J. Math. Mech. 18, 1025 (1969).10.1512/iumj.1969.18.18074Suche in Google Scholar

[8] P. A. Clarkson, M. D. Kruskal, J. Math. Phys. 30, 2201 (1989).10.1063/1.528613Suche in Google Scholar

[9] P. J. Olver, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 444, 509 (1994).10.1098/rspa.1994.0035Suche in Google Scholar

[10] N. Bila, J. Niesen, J. Symbol. Comp. 38, 1523 (2004).10.1016/j.jsc.2004.07.001Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. S. Bruzon and M. L. Gandarias, Comm. Nonl. Sci. Num. Sim. 13, 517 (2008).10.1016/j.cnsns.2006.06.005Suche in Google Scholar

[12] P. A. Clarkson and E. L. Mansfield, SIAM. J. Appl. Math. 55, 1693 (1994).10.1137/S0036139993251846Suche in Google Scholar

[13] T. M. R. Filho, A. Figueiredo, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 467 (2011).10.1016/j.cpc.2010.09.021Suche in Google Scholar

[14] R. Naz, M. D. Khan, and I. Naeem, J. Appl. Math. 2012, 1 (2012).10.1155/2012/938604Suche in Google Scholar

[15] D. K. Ludlow, P. A. Clarkson, and A. P. Bassom. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 53, 175 (2000).Suche in Google Scholar

[16] G. I. Burde, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29, 1665 (1996).10.1088/0305-4470/29/8/015Suche in Google Scholar

[17] G. Saccomandi, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 7005 (2004).10.1088/0305-4470/37/27/010Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-2-16
Accepted: 2015-10-9
Published Online: 2015-11-4
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2015-0072/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen