Sprache und Geschlecht im universitären Diskurs

Literatur

Baron, Bettina (1998): Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle im Fachgespräch: Selbstkritik und Skopuseinschränkung in Beiträgen von Wissenschaftlerinnen. In: Gisela Schoenthal (Hg.): Feministische Linguistik – Linguistische Geschlechterforschung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 175–199.Search in Google Scholar

Beach, Wayne A. (1993): Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. In: Journal of Pragmatics 19, 325–352.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4Search in Google Scholar

Boulima, Jamila (1999): Negotiated Interaction in Target Language Classroom Discourse. Amsterdam und Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.51Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Jean-Claude Passeron, Monique de Saint Martin (1994): Academic Discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bublitz, Wolfram (1978): Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783111712369Search in Google Scholar

Burkhardt, Armin (1982): Die kommunikativen Funktionen von ‚ja‘ und ihre lexikographische Beschreibung in Wörterbüchern. In: Muttersprache: Vierteljahreschrift Für Deutsche Sprache 5–6, 337–361.Search in Google Scholar

Calnan, A. C. T. und Marilyn J. Davidson (1998): The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings. In: Women in Management Review 13, 19–36.10.1108/09649429810369604Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah, Fiona McAlinden und Kathy O’Leary (1988): Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In: Jennifer Coates und Deborah Cameron (Hg.): Women and their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex. London: Longman, 74–93.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah (1995): Rethinking language and gender studies: some issues for the 1990s. In: Sara Mills (Hg.): Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Longman, 31–44.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah (2001): Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah (2005): Language, gender, and sexuality: current issues and new directions. In: Applied Linguistics 26, 482–502.10.1093/applin/ami027Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer (1993): Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Coolican, Hugh (2004): Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Vierte Auflage. London: Hodder Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Dines, Elizabeth R. (1980): Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that.” In: Language in Society 9, 13–31.10.1017/S0047404500007764Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty L. und Isabel M. Crouch (1975): The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they? In: Language in Society 4, 289–294.10.1017/S0047404500006680Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope (2000): Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope (2005): Variation, Convention, and Social Meaning. Plenary talk. Linguistic Society of America. San Francisco.Search in Google Scholar

Eggins, Suzanne und Diana Slade (1997): Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Erman, Britt (1992): Female and male usage of pragmatic expressions in same-sex and mixed-sex interaction. In: Language Variation and Change 4, 217–234.10.1017/S0954394500000764Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Kerstin und Britta Wrede (1997): Discourse particles in female and male human-computer-interaction. In: Proceedings of WiC 1997. Exeter: Intellect.Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, Pamela M. (1978): Interaction: the work women do. In: Social Problems 25, 397–406.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. und Evangeline Marlos Varonis (1986): Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In: Richard R. Day (Hg.): Talking to Learn: Conversations in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, 327–351.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1981): The lecture. In: Erving Goffman (Hg.): Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 162–196.Search in Google Scholar

Gräßel, Ulrike (1991): Sprachverhalten und Geschlecht: eine empirische Studie zu geschlechtsspezifischem Sprachverhalten in Fernsehdiskussionen. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Greenwood, Alice und Alice F. Freed (1992): Women talking to women: the function of questions in conversation. In: Kira Hall, Mary Buchholtz und Birch Moonwomon (Hg.): Locating Power. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 197–206.Search in Google Scholar

Hellinger, Marlis (1995): Language and gender. In: Patrick Stevenson (Hg.): The German Language and the Real World. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 279–314.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John (1988): Current developments in conversation analysis. In: Derek Roger und Peter Bull (Hg.): Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Clevedon (England) und Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, 21–47.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1984): Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for hedges as support structures. In: Te Reo 27, 47–62.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1995): Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1998): Women’s talk: the question of sociolinguistic universals. In: Jennifer Coates (Hg.): Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 461–483.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet und Stephanie Schnurr (2006): ‘Doing femininity’ at work: more than just relational practice. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 10, 31–51.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet und Maria Stubbe (1997): Good listeners: gender differences in New Zealand conversation. In: Women and Language 20, 7–14.Search in Google Scholar

Klann, Gisela (1978): Weibliche Sprache – Identität, Sprache und Kommunikation von Frauen. In: OBST 8, 9–62.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard (1977): Form und Funktion: eine funktionale Betrachtung ausgewählter Bereiche des Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga (1993): Kommunikative Stile, Asymmetrie und „Doing Gender“. In: Feministische Studien 11, 79–95.10.1515/fs-1993-0209Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga (1995): Konversationelle Belehrungsvorträge als Geschlechterpolitik. In: Christa M. Heilmann (Hg.): Frauensprechen – Männersprechen: geschlechtsspezifisches Sprechverhalten. München, Basel: Reinhardt, 58–68.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1975): Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Langdridge, Darren und Gareth Hagger-Johnson (2009): Introduction to Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology. Zweite Auflage. Harlow: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978): Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? In: Language in Society 7, 171–182.10.1017/S0047404500005510Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Harry und Deborah Gray (1983): The lecturer’s ok. In: American Speech 58, 195–200.10.2307/455226Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael (1991): Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael (2002): Good listenership made plain: British and American non-minimal response tokens in everyday conversation. In: Randi Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice und Douglas Biber (Hg.): Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–72.10.1075/scl.9.05mccSearch in Google Scholar

Mehan, Hugh (1979): “What time is it, Denise?”: asking known information questions in classroom discourse. In: Theory Into Practice 18, 285–294.10.1080/00405847909542846Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam (1996): Dealing with gender identity as a sociolinguistic variable. In: Victoria L. Bergvall, Janet M. Bing und Alice F. Freed (Hg.): Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. London: Longman, 202–227.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara (2003a): Third wave feminist linguistics and the analysis of sexism. In: Discourse Analysis Online. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/open/2003/001/mills2003001.html (1.5.2011).Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara (2003b): Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley (1987): Observing and Analyzing Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor (1992): Indexing gender. In: Alessandro Duranti und Charles Goodwin (Hg.): Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–358.Search in Google Scholar

O’Barr, William M. und Bowman K. Atkins (1980): Women’s language or powerless language. In: Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker und Nelly Furman (Hg.): Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger, 98–110.Search in Google Scholar

Östman, Jan-Ola (1981): „You know“: A Discourse-Functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.ii.7Search in Google Scholar

Pichler, Heike (2010): Methods in discourse variation analysis: reflections on the way forward. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 14, 581–608.Search in Google Scholar

Poos, Deanna und Rita Simpson (2002): Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In: Randi Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice und Douglas Biber (Hg.): Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–23.10.1075/scl.9.03pooSearch in Google Scholar

Rehbein, Jochen (1979): Sprechhandlungsaugmente. Zur Organisation der Hörersteuereung. In: Harald Weydt (Hg.): Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter, 58–74.Search in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne und Deborah Lange (1991): The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: a case of grammaticalization in progress. In: American Speech 66, 240–77.10.2307/455799Search in Google Scholar

Rosenblum, Karen E. (1986): Revelatory or purposive? Making sense of a female register. In: Semiotica 59, 157–70.10.1515/semi.1986.59.1-2.157Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Stanley, Nicholas Christenfeld, Bernard Ravina und Frances Bilous (1991): Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, 362–367.10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.362Search in Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik (2008): Gender and academic discourse: global restrictions and local possibilities. In: Language in Society 37, 515–538.10.1017/S0047404508080755Search in Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik (2009): A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. In: Journal of Pragmatics 41, 1104–1124.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Antje (1995): „Untypisches“ Gesprächsverhalten weiblicher Studierender. In: Christa M. Heilmann (Hg.): Frauensprechen – Männersprechen: geschlechtsspezifisches Sprechverhalten. München, Basel: Reinhardt, 89–97.Search in Google Scholar

Schoenthal, Gisela (1998): Geschlechtsspezifisches Kommunikationsverhalten: Ergebnisse, Konsequenzen, Perspektiven. In: Gisela Schoenthal (Hg.): Feministische Linguistik – Linguistische Geschlechterforschung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 155–174.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, Rita C., Sarah L. Briggs, Janine Ovens und John M. Swales (2000): The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John und Malcolm Coulthard (1975): Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael (1983): Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Swacker, Marjorie (1975): The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In: Barrie Thorne und Nancy Henley (Hg.): Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, 76–83.Search in Google Scholar

Swann, Joan (2002): ‘Yes, but is it gender?’ In: Lia Litosseliti und Jane Sunderland (Hg.): Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 43–67.10.1075/dapsac.2.03swaSearch in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (1990): You just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (1994): Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (2002): Agonism in academic discourse. In: Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1651–1669.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00079-6Search in Google Scholar

Thimm, Caja (1995): Durchsetzungsstrategien von Frauen und Männern: Sprachliche Unterschiede oder Stereotype Erwartungen? In: Christa M. Heilmann (Hg.): Frauensprechen – Männersprechen: geschlechtsspezifisches Sprechverhalten. München, Basel: Reinhardt, 120–129.Search in Google Scholar

Thimm, Caja (1998): Frauen, Sprache, Beruf: Sprachliches Handeln am Arbeitsplatz. In: Gisela Schoenthal (Hg.): Feministische Linguistik – Linguistische Geschlechterforschung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 325–346.Search in Google Scholar

Tottie, Gunnel (1991): Conversational style in British and American English: the case of backchannels. In: Karin Aijmer und Bengt Altenberg (Hg.): English Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman, 254–271.Search in Google Scholar

Trömel-Plötz, Senta (1978): Linguistik und Frauensprache. In: Linguistische Berichte 57, 49–68.Search in Google Scholar

Trömel-Plötz, Senta (1984): Die Konstruktion konversationeller Unterschiede in der Sprache von Frauen und Männern. In: Senta Trömel-Plötz (Hg.): Gewalt durch Sprache: die Vergewaltigung von Frauen in Gesprächen. Frankfurt: Fischer, 288–319.Search in Google Scholar

Trömel-Plötz, Senta (1992): The construction of conversational equality by women. In: Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz und Birch Moonwomon (Hg.): Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 581–589.Search in Google Scholar