Home The Slimic Imagination and Elemental Eco-Horror
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Slimic Imagination and Elemental Eco-Horror

  • Simon C. Estok EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Slime—elemental to life and to eco-horror—is conceptually entangled with many things, some very unsavory. It is an utterly indifferent element, but for millennia in the popular imagination, it has been an elemental intruder, a border-crosser, an agent with bad intentions. Raced, classed, and gendered, slime is unpredictable and uncontainable. Its very elementality is ambivalent. Scholars have grappled usefully with slime as a theoretical concept, but little has appeared linking specific examples of the raced, classed, and gendered slimic imagination with eco-horror. “The Slimic Imagination and Elemental Eco-horror” begins such a discussion, based on specific literary and filmic examples from a range of historical periods, to show that slime is elementally transmorphous, is liminal in many senses, and that it moves freely across the borders of the living and the dead, the solid and the liquid, the dangerous and the necessary, evoking responses as varied as terror and horror, on the one hand, and joy and excitement on the other. Slime appears in variously devious forms in texts from Dickens to Swift, from Brontë to Stevenson, from Roth to Machen, and from Kenneth Branagh to Ridley Scott—never in the same way, but always in ways that demand political engagement.


Corresponding author: Prof. Simon C. Estok, Sungyunkwan University, 53 Myeongnyun-dong 3-ga, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-745, South Korea, E-mail:

References

Alaimo, S. 2015. “Elemental Love in the Anthropocene.” In Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire, edited by J. J. Cohen and L. Duckert, 298–309. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

“Alien 3: Official Trailer.” 2013. YouTube Video. Movie Trailer 1:20. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipv1y-Phi7A (accessed November 09, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Brayton, D. 2015. “Shakespeare and Slime: Notes on the Anthropocene.” In Ecological Approaches to Early Modern English Texts. A Field Guide to Reading and Teaching, edited by J. Munroe, E. J. Geisweidt, and L. Bruckner, 81–90. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Brontë, C. 1971 In Jane Eyre, edited by R. J. Dunn. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. J., and L. Duckert. 2015. “Introduction: Eleven Principles of the Elements.” In Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire, edited by J. J. Cohen and L. Duckert, 1–26. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dickens, C. 1980 In Great Expectations, edited by R. D. McMaster. Toronto: Gage.Search in Google Scholar

Dickinson, A. 2018. Anatomic. Toronto: Coach House.Search in Google Scholar

Empson, W. 1964. “The Ancient Mariner.” Critical Quarterly 6 (4): 298–319, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1964.tb01250.x.Search in Google Scholar

Estok, S. C. 2019. “Ecophobia, The Agony of Water, and Misogyny.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 26 (2): 473–85, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isz049.Search in Google Scholar

Estok, S. C. 2021a. “The Environmental Imagination in the Slime of the Ancient Mariner.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 34 (2): 135–8, https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769x.2019.1643700.Search in Google Scholar

Estok, S. C. 2021b. “Sweet-and-Sour Soup for the Psyche: Horror’s Ecophobic Leanings.” English Language Notes 59 (2): 81–90, https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-9277282.Search in Google Scholar

Foy, J. J. 2010. “It Came from Planet Earth: Eco-Horror and the Politics of Post-Environmentalism in The Happening.” In Homer Simpson Marches on Washington: Dissent Through American Popular Culture, edited by T. M. Dale and J. J. Foy, 167–88. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Search in Google Scholar

Fulford, T. 2006. “Slavery and Superstition in the Supernatural Poems.” In The Cambridge Companion to Coleridge, edited by L. Newlyun, 45–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521650712.004Search in Google Scholar

Hurley, K. 2004. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingwersen, M., and T. Müller. 2021. “Mobilizing the Elemental Turn in Contemporary Ecocriticism.” YouTube Video 23:13. In Conference Paper Recording, ASLE 2021: Emergence/y. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVUMPkLeojg (accessed August 21, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Jue, M. 2020. Wild Blue Media: Thinking Through Seawater. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9781478007548Search in Google Scholar

Kember, S., and J. Zylinska. 2012. Life After New Media: Mediation as Vital Process. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8796.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. L. S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Macauley, D. 2010. Elemental Philosophy: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water as Environmental Ideas. New York: State University of New York Press.10.1353/book536Search in Google Scholar

Machen, A. 1894. The Great God Pan. London: John Lane.Search in Google Scholar

Machen, A. 1913. Hieroglyphics: A Note upon Ecstasy in Literature. New York: Mitchell Kennerly.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, W. I. 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041066Search in Google Scholar

Morton, T. 2015. “Elementality.” In Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire, edited by J. J. Cohen and L. Duckert, 271–85. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, J. 2020. “The 1798 Poem that was Made for 2020: ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’ is Taking on New Meaning During the Coronavirus Pandemic.” The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/05/rime-ancient-mariner-was-made-2020/611602/ (accessed November 09, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Pauly, D. 2010. Five Easy Pieces: The Impact of Fisheries on Marine Ecosystems. Washington: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J. D. 2015. The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226253978.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pitt, S. 2019. “Snail Slime: The Science Behind Molluscs as Medicine.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/snail-slime-the-science-behind-molluscs-as-medicine-125156 (accessed November 09, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Roth, P. 2010. Nemesis. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Sartre, J. 1966. Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology. Trans. H. E. Barnes. New York: First Pocket Books.Search in Google Scholar

2004. “Introduction.” In New Perspectives on Environmental Justice: Gender, Sexuality, and Activism, edited by R. Stein, 1–17. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stevenson, R. L. 2003. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. New York: Signet.Search in Google Scholar

Swift, J. 1960 In Gulliver’s Travels and Other Writings, edited by Landa, L. A. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Thacker, E. 2011. In the Dust of this Planet: Horror of Philosophy, Vol. 1. Hampshire: Zero Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wald, P. 2008. Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11sms36Search in Google Scholar

Woodard, B. 2012. Slime Dynamics. Hampshire: Zero Books.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-03-18
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2022-2049/html
Scroll to top button