Startseite Searching for the Broad Present: The Chronotope in Teju Cole’s Open City
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Searching for the Broad Present: The Chronotope in Teju Cole’s Open City

  • Lucas W. Mattila EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. November 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Teju Cole’s Open City provides a suitable springboard for insight into the dynamic ways in which Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht’s concept of a broad present might relate to the spatial-temporal configurations of a text. More specifically, Open City uses a combination of formal and stylistic approaches to illustrate the instability innate in modern, urban spaces to demonstrate the approaching apocalyptic visions of the future as well as the torrential multiplicity of histories that threaten to subsume the present. Stable notions of time are shown to be paralyzing, and alternatives ought to be sought out in presenting a sense of space-time that is free from the stagnation promised by dominant modes of spatial-temporal configurations.


Corresponding author: Lucas W. Mattila, English and American Studies Department, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Geb. 23.21.01.55, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany, E-mail:

References

Bemong, N., Borghart, P., De Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., De Temmerman, K., and Keunen, B., eds. (2010). Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent: Academia Press.10.26530/OAPEN_377572Suche in Google Scholar

Boehmer, E. 2018. Postcolonial Poetics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-90341-5Suche in Google Scholar

Chassot, J. 2018. Ghosts of the African Diaspora: Re-visioning History, Memory, and Identity. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, R. 2018. “‘Visible only in speech’: Peripatetic Parasitism, or, Becoming Bedbugs in Open City.” Narrative 26 (2): 181–200, https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2018.0007.Suche in Google Scholar

Cole, T. 2012. Open City: A Novel. New York: Random House Incorporated.Suche in Google Scholar

Cresswell, T. 2015. Place: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Elze, J. 2017. “Cosmopolitan Place, Postcolonial Time, and the Politics of Modernism in Teju Cole’s Open City.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 65 (1): 85–104, https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2017-0007.Suche in Google Scholar

Gehrmann, S. 2016. “Cosmopolitanism with African Roots. Afropolitanism’s Ambivalent Mobilities.” Journal of African Cultural Studies 28 (1): 61–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2015.1112770.Suche in Google Scholar

Golimowska, K. 2016. The Post-9/11 City in Novels: Literary Remappings of New York and London. Jefferson: McFarland & Company Incorporated.Suche in Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, H. U. 2014. Our Broad Present: Time and Contemporary Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/gumb16360Suche in Google Scholar

Krishnan, M. 2015. “Postcoloniality, Spatiality and Cosmopolitanism in the Open City.” Textual Practice 29 (4): 675–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2014.987686.Suche in Google Scholar

Maver, I. 2018. “Teju Cole’s Transcultural Urban Novel Open City.” In The Postcolonial Subject in Transit: Migration, Borders and Subjectivity in Contemporary African Diaspora Literature, edited by D. Fongang, 71–80. Lanham: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Neumann, B., and Y. Kappel. 2019. “Music and Latency in Teju Cole’s Open City: Presences of the Past.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature 50 (1): 31–62, https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2019.0002.Suche in Google Scholar

Neumann, B., and G. Rippl. 2017. “Celebrating Afropolitan Identities? Contemporary African World Literatures in English.” Anglia 135 (1): 159–85, https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2017-0010.Suche in Google Scholar

NYT. 1863. “The Mob in New York.” Article. The New York Times. July 14, 1863.Suche in Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, P. 2002. “Reading Beginnings and Endings.” In Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure and Frames, edited by B. Richardson, 300–12. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Smethurst, P. 2000. The Postmodern Chronotope: Reading Space and Time in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004483248Suche in Google Scholar

Soja, E. 2009. “Taking space personally.” In The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by B. Warf, and S. Arias, 27–51. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Steckenbiller, C. 2018. “Diasporic Ways of Knowing: Teju Cole’s Open City.” In New Directions in Diaspora Studies: Cultural and Literary Approaches, edited by S. Ilott, A. C. Mendes, and L. Newns, 71–86. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Suche in Google Scholar

Syjuco, M. 2011. “These Crowded Streets.” The New York Times Book Review 27. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/books/review/Syjuco-t.html (accessed June 30, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Vermeulen, P. 2015. Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel: Creature, Affect, Form. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137414533Suche in Google Scholar

Young, H. B. 2006. Haunting Capital: Memory, Text and the Black Diasporic Body. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-26
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2021-2031/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen