How to Read the ‘Literary’ in the Literary Market

References

Altieri, C. 2009. “Why Modernist Claims to Autonomy Matter.” Journal of Modern Literature 32 (3): 1–21.10.2979/JML.2009.32.3.1Search in Google Scholar

Balibar, E., and P. Macherey. 1996 [1974]. “On Literature as Ideological Form.” In Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader, edited by T. Eagleton, and D. Milne, 275–95. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, P. 2013. English in Practice: In Pursuit of English Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Barth, J. 1984. “The Literature of Replenishment.” In The Friday Book: Essays and Other Non-Fiction, 193–206. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, C. 2008. Bestseller: Popular Fiction since 1900. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230583870Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1992. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brouillette, S. 2007. Postcolonial Writers and the Global Literary Marketplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230288171Search in Google Scholar

Brouillette, S. 2017. “Neoliberalism and the Demise of the Literary.” In Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Culture, edited by M. Huehls, and R. Greenwald Smith, 277–90. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, N. 2019. Autonomy: The Social Ontology of the Work of Art under Capitalism. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.10.1515/9781478002673Search in Google Scholar

Casanova, P. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, J. 2010. Bring on the Books for Everybody: How Literary Culture Became Popular Culture. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822391975Search in Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. 2008 [1983]. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

English, J. F. 2005. The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674036536Search in Google Scholar

Greenwald Smith, R. 2018. “The Contemporary Novel and Postdemocratic Form.” Novel 51: 292–307, https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-6846138.Search in Google Scholar

Hungerford, A. 2016. Making Literature Now. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Juvan, M. 2003. “On Literariness: From Post-Structuralism to Systems Theory.” In Comparative Literature and Comparative Cultural Studies, edited by S. Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.10.7771/1481-4374.1068Search in Google Scholar

Koegler, C. 2018. Critical Branding: Postcolonial Studies and the Market. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315144825Search in Google Scholar

Leypoldt, G. 2014. “Singularity and the Literary Market.” New Literary History 45: 71–88, https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0000.Search in Google Scholar

Leypoldt, G. 2015. “Shifting Meridians. U.S. Authorship in World Literary Space.” American Literary History 27 (4): 768–87, https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajv041.Search in Google Scholar

Leypoldt, G. 2016. “Degrees of Public Relevance: Walter Scott and Toni Morrison.” Modern Language Quarterly 77 (3): 369–93, https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570645.Search in Google Scholar

Leypoldt, G. 2017. “Knausgaard in America: Literary Prestige and Charismatic Trust.” Critical Quarterly 59 (3): 55–69.10.1111/criq.12357Search in Google Scholar

Leypoldt, G. 2018. “Social Dimensions of the Turn to Genre: Junot Díaz’s Oscar Wao and Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Buried Giant.” Post45. http://post45.org/2018/03/social-dimensions-of-the-turn-to-genre-junot-diazs-oscar-wao-and-kazuo-ishiguros-the-buried-giant/ (accessed June 15, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Macherey, P. 1978. A Theory of Literary Production. London, Henley and Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Manshel, A., L. B. McGrath, and J. D. Porter. 2019. “Who Cares About Literary Prizes?” PublicBooks. https://www.publicbooks.org/who-cares-about-literary-prizes/ (accessed August 1, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

McGurl, M. 2009. The Program Era. Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjsf59fSearch in Google Scholar

McGurl, M. 2016. “Everything and Less: Fiction in the Age of Amazon.” Modern Language Quarterly 77 (3): 447–71, https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570689.Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, F. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, F. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

North, J. 2017. Literary Criticism: A Short Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674978522Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, J. 2016. Minor Characters Have Their Day: Genre and the Contemporary Literary Marketplace. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.10.7312/rose17744Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, J. 2018. “Literary Fiction and the Genres of Genre Fiction.” Post45. http://post45.org/2018/08/literary-fiction-and-the-genres-of-genre-fiction/ (accessed July 13, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, K. 2020. “The Cosmopolitan Value of the Multicultural Novel.” In The Novel as Network: Forms, Ideas, Commodities, edited by T. Lanzendörfer, and C. Norrick-Rühl, 51–68. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-53409-7_4Search in Google Scholar

Theisohn, P., and C. Weder. 2013. “Literatur als/statt Betrieb—Einleitung.” In Literaturbetrieb: Zur Poetik einer Produktionsgemeinschaft, edited by P. Theisohn, and C. Weder, 7–16. München: Wilhelm Fink.10.30965/9783846752968_002Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, J. B. 2012. Merchants of Culture. London: Polity: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century.Search in Google Scholar