Abstract
Blended Classic Joint Attention (BCJA) can deploy blends of form-meaning pairs across multiple modalities to suggest paths along which to construct meaning rather than to make assertions or convey information. An illustration is provided of suggestive landscapes, focusing on blended classic joint attention in the construal of an American college campus.
References
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., and T. Henetz. 2014. “Working together.” In Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, edited by T. Holtgraves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eliade, M. 1954. The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History. Transl. from the French by Willard Trask. Bollingen Series XLVI. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1981. “Pragmatics and the Description of Discourse.” In Radical Pragmatics, edited by P. Cole, 143–66. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., and G. Trousdale, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Israel, M. 1996. “The Way Constructions Grow.” In Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, edited by A. Goldberg, 217–30. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Kay, P., and Fillmore, C. 1999. “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The ‘What’s X doing Y?’ Construction.” Language 75 (1): 1–33.10.2307/417472Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 1982. “The Study of Gesture: Some Remarks in its History.” Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 2: 45–62.10.5840/cpsem198148Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1985. “Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity.” In Iconicity in Syntax, edited by J. Haiman, 109–50. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.6.07lanSearch in Google Scholar
Matthews, A. 1997. Bright College Years: Inside the American Campus Today. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 2000. “Introduction.” In Language and Gesture, edited by D. McNeill, 141–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 2016. Why we Gesture: The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316480526Search in Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27 (379–423): 623–56, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.Search in Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-72548-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1998-07-15.Search in Google Scholar
Spolsky, B., and R. Cooper. 1991. The Languages of Jerusalem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198239086.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, F-N., and M. Turner. 2011. Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1515/9781400838547Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674044371Search in Google Scholar
Turner, M. 2014. The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. Oxford University Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2020. “It’s Time to Do News Again.” ZAA 68(4): 379–409.10.1515/zaa-2020-2016Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Multimodal Research in Linguistics
- Articles
- Multimodal Event Construals: The Role of Co-Speech Gestures in English vs. Czech Interactions
- It’s Time to Do News Again
- Enaction Through Co-speech Gesture: The Rhetorical Handing of the Mental Timeline
- What Film Translation can Tell us About the Creation of Meaning, the Role of Accents and Gestures – A Few Essayistic Remarks About Multimodality
- Suggestive Landscape
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Multimodal Research in Linguistics
- Articles
- Multimodal Event Construals: The Role of Co-Speech Gestures in English vs. Czech Interactions
- It’s Time to Do News Again
- Enaction Through Co-speech Gesture: The Rhetorical Handing of the Mental Timeline
- What Film Translation can Tell us About the Creation of Meaning, the Role of Accents and Gestures – A Few Essayistic Remarks About Multimodality
- Suggestive Landscape