Abstract
This article analyzes the first season of Damages (2007) as an early example of the representation of ‘difficult’ women on television. More specifically, I investigate the relationship between the show’s character conception and its complex narration. I argue that all the major male and female characters on the show are ‘difficult’ in the sense that the audience experiences close alignment but troubled allegiance to them. However, the two female protagonists – top-notch lawyer Patty Hewes and her young and initially idealistic associate Ellen Parsons – are also opaque characters about whose thoughts and plans the audience is largely left in the dark. This opacity is mirrored and enhanced by the narration, which constantly teases the audience by withholding information about the plot, suggests inferences that then turn out to be wrong, and generally provides far more insight into the male characters than into the female characters.
Works Cited
“A Regular Earl Anthony” (2007). Dir. Jean DeSegonzac. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
“And My Paralyzing Fear of Death” (2007). Dir. John David Coles. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
“Because I Know Patty” (2007). Dir. Todd A. Kessler. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
“But You Don’t Do That Anymore” (2012). Dir. Glenn Kessler. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
Corcos, Christine A. (2009). “Damages: The Truth Is Out There.” Michael Asimow, ed. Lawyers in Your Living Room! Law on Television. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 265–273.Search in Google Scholar
“Damages (season 1)” (2018). Wikipedia. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages_(season_1))> (December 29, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
“Do You Regret What We Did?” (2007). Dir. Thomas Carter. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
Erickson, Hal (2009). Encyclopedia of Television Law Shows: Factual and Fictional Series about Judges, Lawyers and the Courtroom, 1948–2008. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar
“Get Me a Lawyer” (2007). Dir. Allen Coulter. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
Holzleithner, Elisabeth (2015). “‘The Game is Rigged’: Fictions of Lawyering.” Christian Hiebaum, Susanne Knaller, and Doris Pichler, eds. Recht und Literatur im Zwischenraum/Law and Literature In-Between: Aktuelle Inter- und Transdisziplinäre Zugänge/Contemporary Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approaches. Bielefeld: transcript, 2015, 287–303.10.1515/9783839428443-014Search in Google Scholar
“I Hate These People” (2007). Dir. Ed Bianchi. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Brett (2013). Difficult Men: Behind the Scenes of a Creative Revolution: From The Sopranos and The Wire to Mad Men and Breaking Bad. New York, NY: Penguin.10.5040/9780571343409Search in Google Scholar
Mittell, Jason (2015). Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pape, Toni (2012). “Temporalities on Collision Course: Time, Knowledge, and Temporal Critique in Damages.” Melissa Ames, ed. Time in Television Narrative: Exploring Temporality in Twenty-First-Century Programming. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 165–177.10.14325/mississippi/9781617032936.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
“She Spat at Me” (2007). Dir. Mario Van Peebles. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
“Tastes Like a Ho-Ho” (2007). Dir. Larry Trilling. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
“There’s No ‘We’ Anymore” (2007). Dir. Mario Van Peebles. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
Villez, Barbara (2009). “Damages: Trust No One; Believe Only What You See.” GRAAT: Groupe De Recherches Anglo-Américaines De Tours 6, 181–194.Search in Google Scholar
“We Are Not Animals” (2007). Dir. Dan Attias. Damages. Sony Pictures Television.Search in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Articles
- Difficult Women: Changing Representations of Female Characters in Contemporary Television Series
- “Trust no one”: Narrative Complexity and Character Opacity in Damages
- Veep, Invective Spectacle, and the Figure of the Comedic Antiheroine
- “I imagined a story where I didn’t have to be the damsel”: Seriality, Reflexivity, and Narratively Complex Women in Westworld
- Shifting Spaces and Constant Patriarchy: The Characterizations of Offred and Claire in The Handmaid’s Tale and Outlander
- Book Reviews
- Enemies of all Humankind: Fictions of Legitimate Violence
- Keywords of Mobility: Critical Engagements
- Über Raymond Williams: Annäherungen. Positionen. Ausblicke
- Books Received
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Articles
- Difficult Women: Changing Representations of Female Characters in Contemporary Television Series
- “Trust no one”: Narrative Complexity and Character Opacity in Damages
- Veep, Invective Spectacle, and the Figure of the Comedic Antiheroine
- “I imagined a story where I didn’t have to be the damsel”: Seriality, Reflexivity, and Narratively Complex Women in Westworld
- Shifting Spaces and Constant Patriarchy: The Characterizations of Offred and Claire in The Handmaid’s Tale and Outlander
- Book Reviews
- Enemies of all Humankind: Fictions of Legitimate Violence
- Keywords of Mobility: Critical Engagements
- Über Raymond Williams: Annäherungen. Positionen. Ausblicke
- Books Received