Startseite Tellabilities – Diatopic/Diachronic: Where and When a Story Is Worth Telling and Where and When It Is Not
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Tellabilities – Diatopic/Diachronic: Where and When a Story Is Worth Telling and Where and When It Is Not

  • Andreas Mahler EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Dezember 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Man/woman has been described as the meaning-generating, story-telling animal (‘homo narrans’). In developing narratives, we continuously (and communally) attempt to make sense of life: to turn the contingent into some common coherent form, apt to bring order into the indiscrete flow of events and to (meaningfully) explain to us the ‘world.’ This has been addressed under the concept of ‘tellability.’ Tellability seems to transform something that can be told into something that is worth telling – that has some hermeneutical or cognitive or even only phatic value in that it invites us to understand (again and again) what (and why it) ‘happened.’ The article traces this process of creating community through telling first diatopically, by exploring forms and practices of narrating in different contexts and cultures, and then diachronically, by focusing on what makes a story a ‘good’ story in different periods of time. Drawing on pragmatic and functionalist theories of language and literature, it attempts to show that the idea of a story that is ‘worth it’ – or, as for that, ‘relatable’ – is largely dependent precisely upon the story’s ‘relation’ to its users and, by extension, to its embedding culture as well as to its point in time.

Works Cited

Baroni, Raphaël (2009). “Tellability.” Peter Hühn, John Pier, Wolf Schmid, and Jörg Schönert, eds. Handbook of Narratology. Berlin and New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 447–454.10.1515/9783110217445.447Suche in Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann (1967 [1966]). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans (1979 [1964]). “The Concept of Reality and the Possibility of the Novel.” Richard E. Amacher and Victor Lange, eds. New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism: A Collection of Essays. Trans. David Henry Wilson et al. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 29–48.10.1515/9781400866984-003Suche in Google Scholar

Bohannan, Laura (1968 [1966]). “Shakespeare in the Bush.” Alan Dundes, ed. Every Man His Way: Readings in Cultural Anthropology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 477–486.Suche in Google Scholar

Brancher, Dominique (2016). “Universals in the Bush: The Case of Hamlet.” Ina Habermann and Michelle Witen, eds. Shakespeare and Space: Theatrical Explorations of the Spatial Paradigm. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–162.10.1057/978-1-137-51835-4_8Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, Lewis (1976 [1865/1872]). The Annotated Alice. Ed. Martin Gardner. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. Hassocks: Harvester.Suche in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan (2011 [1997]). Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199691340.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin Frank (2010). The Language Impact: Evolution – System – Discourse. London: Equinox.10.3138/9781845539597Suche in Google Scholar

Fisher, Walther (1987). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika (1996). Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Suche in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika (2012). “How Natural is ‘Unnatural Narratology’; or, What is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology?” Narrative 20.3, 357–370.10.1353/nar.2012.0019Suche in Google Scholar

Furth, Hans G., ed. (1969). Piaget and Knowledge: Theoretical Foundations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul (1975 [1967]). “Logic and Conversation.” Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York, NY: Academic Press, 41–58.10.1163/9789004368811_003Suche in Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim (2007). Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203961155Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman (1960). “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” Thomas A. Sebeok, ed. Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.Suche in Google Scholar

Koschorke, Albrecht (2012). Wahrheit und Erfindung: Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Erzähltheorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PE: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky (1967). “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” June Helm, ed. Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 12–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey (1989 [1983]). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Lotman, Jurij M. (1979). “The Origin of Plot in the Light of Typology.” Poetics Today 1.1–2, 161–184.10.2307/1772046Suche in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yuri M. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Trans. Ann Shukman. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yuri M. and Boris A. Uspenskij (1978). “On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture.” New Literary History 9.2, 211–232.10.2307/468571Suche in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1995 [1984]). Social Systems. Trans. John Bednarz, jr., and Dirk Baecker. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McHale, Brian (1989 [1987]). Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Mahler, Andreas (1998). “Welt Modell Theater: Sujetbildung und Sujetwandel im englischen Drama der Frühen Neuzeit.” Poetica 30.1–2, 1–45.10.30965/25890530-0300102001Suche in Google Scholar

Mahler, Andreas (2013a). “As You Don’t Like It: In-Between Spaces on the Shakespearean Stage.” Litteraria Pragensia 23.45, 65–81.Suche in Google Scholar

Mahler, Andreas (2013b). “Joyce’s Bovarysm: Paradigmatic Disenchantment into Syntagmatic Progression.” Comparatio 5.2, 249–295.Suche in Google Scholar

Mahler, Andreas (2016). “‘Übersetzen’ als Kulturprozess: Thesen zur Dynamis gemachter Welten.” Anglia 134.4, 668–682.10.1515/ang-2016-0073Suche in Google Scholar

Morris, Charles William (1971 [1939]). “Esthetics and the Theory of Signs”. Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton, 415–433.10.1515/9783110810592.415Suche in Google Scholar

Pratt, Mary Louise (1977). Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques (2006 [2000]). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Trans. with an Introduction by Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Rushdie, Salman (1988). The Satanic Verses. New York, NY: Viking.Suche in Google Scholar

Rushdie, Salman (2011). “Es war so, es war nicht so: Warum es gut ist, dass wir widersprüchliche Wesen sind, Oder: ein Hohelied aufs Paradox.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 11.Suche in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure (2005). “Tellability.” David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan, eds. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge, 589–591.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwab, Gabriele (1996). The Mirror and the Killer-Queen: Otherness in Literary Language. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.10.2979/2356.0Suche in Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William (1988). The Complete Works. Eds. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar

Tate, Nahum (1976 [1681]). The History of King Lear. Regents Restoration Drama Series. Ed. James Black. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Warning, Rainer (1980). “Staged Discourse: Remarks on the Pragmatics of Fiction.” Dispositio: Revista Hispánica de Semiótica Literaria 5.13–14, 35–54.Suche in Google Scholar

Warning, Rainer (1981–1982). “Irony and the ‘Order of Discourse’ in Flaubert.” New Literary History 13, 253–286.10.2307/468912Suche in Google Scholar

Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Beavin Bavelas, and Don D. Jackson (2011 [1967]). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang (2008). Shakespeare in Bayern – und auf Bairisch. Passau: Stutz.Suche in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1967). Zettel. Eds. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-12-5
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 19.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2017-0035/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen