Abstract
The present paper focuses on non-canonical syntactic constructions in the language of evaluation. It explores in which ways and under which conditions certain syntactic constructions deviating from the unmarked SVX pattern can support the expression of the writer’s/speaker’s attitude. The study is based on a corpus of academic and non-academic book reviews (published online and in print in scientific journals of different disciplines and on the cataloguing website Goodreads respectively). It-extrapositions, existential there sentences, and wh-clefts contained in the corpus were analysed not only as to the evaluations expressed within them but also as to other parameters, including the occurrence of different forms of evaluation, the mention of specific sources or participating roles of evaluation as well as information structure.
Works Cited
Aristotle (1926). Art of Rhetoric. With an English translation by J. H. Freese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-art_rhetoric.1926Suche in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32Suche in Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea (2008). “Clefting and Extraposition in English.” ICAME Journal 32, 7–32.Suche in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1986). “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” Wallace Chafe and Joanna Nichols, eds. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 261–272.Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (1992). “Cleft Existentials in English.” Language Sciences 14.4, 419–433.10.1016/0388-0001(92)90024-9Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (1994). “Extraposition in English.” Functions of Language 1.1, 7–24.10.1075/fol.1.1.03colSuche in Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (2006). “It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1706–1720.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.015Suche in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1976). “Topic, Pronoun and Grammatical Agreement.” Charles N. Li, ed. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 149–188.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle and Laura Michaelis (2001). “Topicalization and Left-Dislocation: A Functional Opposition Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1665–1706.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1Suche in Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1975). “Logic and Conversation.” Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics. 3 vols. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.10.1163/9789004368811_003Suche in Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. (1993). “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language 69.2, 274–307.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.5Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael and Christian Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Herriman, Jennifer (2000). “The Functions of Extraposition in English Texts.” Functions of Language 7.2, 203–230.10.1075/fol.7.2.03herSuche in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan (2011). Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair (2000). “A Local Grammar of Evaluation.” Hunston, Sarah and Geoff Thompson, eds. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74–101.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.54Suche in Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther (2005). “It-extraposition in English. A functional view.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10.2, 119–159.10.1075/ijcl.10.2.02kalSuche in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey and Jan Svartvik (1975). A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, Jim (2000). “Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English.” Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson, eds. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–175.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James and Peter White (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Suche in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin (1989). “Language Has a Heart.” Text 9.1, 7–26.10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7Suche in Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen (1981). “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” Peter Cole, ed. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–255.Suche in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John (1988). “Mirror for a Text.” Journal of English and Foreign Languages 1, 15–44.Suche in Google Scholar
StataCorp LP (2012). Stata 12/MP 4. StataCorp LP, College Station.Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston (2000). “Evaluation: An Introduction.” Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson, eds. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–27.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory and Betty Birner (2004). “Information Structure and Non-canonical Syntax.” Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, eds. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden: Blackwell, 153–174.10.1002/9780470756959.ch7Suche in Google Scholar
Weinert, Regina (1995). “Focusing Constructions in Spoken Language. Clefts, Y-movement, thematization and deixis in English and German.” Linguistische Berichte 159, 341–369.Suche in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Non-Canonical Grammar!?
- Articles
- “Hard to Beat Dickens’ Characters”: Non-Canonical Syntax in Evaluative Texts
- Non-Canonical Syntax in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Pilot Study on Fronting
- Typological Interference in Information Structure: The Case of Topicalization in Asia
- Non-Canonical Speech Acts in the History of English
- Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda – Non-Canonical Forms on the Move?
- Chosen
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Non-Canonical Grammar!?
- Articles
- “Hard to Beat Dickens’ Characters”: Non-Canonical Syntax in Evaluative Texts
- Non-Canonical Syntax in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Pilot Study on Fronting
- Typological Interference in Information Structure: The Case of Topicalization in Asia
- Non-Canonical Speech Acts in the History of English
- Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda – Non-Canonical Forms on the Move?
- Chosen