Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

12 Changing the Imperial Mindset

The Public Sphere of Public Law
Published/Copyright: July 27, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information Explore this Subject
Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy
From the journal Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy Volume 2016 Issue 1

Abstract

The evolution of the present legal system is powered by the contradictory double-structure of a law that is at once is repressive and emancipatory. I take three examples, one from the early stage of the twentieth century’s legal transformations, and two from the present. They all show that the latent emancipatory potential of public law can be activated to challenge repressive function of hegemonic law. The first example is concerned with the challenge of imperial law from within the managerial mindset of the legal system, the second shows that every modern constitutional law “can strike back”. The third one emphasizes the tension between the Kantian constitutional mindset and the managerial mindset that dominates present international law.

Published Online: 2016-7-27
Published in Print: 2016-7-25

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Editorial Preface
  3. Contents
  4. 1 Preface
  5. 2 The Current Situation of Chinese Philosophy: Problems and Tasks
  6. 3 Chinese Philosophy – Philosophy in China
  7. I Public Sphere and Globalization
  8. 4 The Publicity of Reason(ing)
  9. 5 Digitalization: Another Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere?
  10. II Fundamental Philosophical Questions in Public Sphere
  11. 6 Pluralism, Autonomy and Public Deliberation
  12. 7 Kant on the Public Sphere and Some Reflections on Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Intercultural Discussion
  13. 8 The Public Sphere and the Faculty of Judgment: Hannah Arendt’s Theses on Public Opinion
  14. 9 On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast Between Téchne and Túche – A Comparison Between Arendt and Heidegger
  15. 10 Habermas on Instrumental Reasoning in Public Sphere
  16. III Public Sphere and Ethics
  17. 11 Republicity
  18. 12 Changing the Imperial Mindset
  19. 13 Communicative Power and the Public Sphere
  20. IV The Problem of Public Sphere in Asian Cultures
  21. 14 Public Sphere and Open Society from the Perspective of Axial Age China
  22. 15 How to Jointly Decide What Ought to Be Done?
  23. 16 The Confucian Concept of “Cheng” (Integrity) in Relation to Publicity and Justice
  24. V Public Sphere and Democracy
  25. 17 National and International Public Spheres and the Protection of Human Rights
  26. 18 International Justice and the Limit of Public Reason
  27. 19 Privacy and/in the Public Sphere
  28. 20 Context, Perspective and Research Method: Several Problems of the Research on Publicness
  29. VI Publicity and Justice
  30. 21 Origins of Justice Theory in China and West
  31. 22 Representation, Political and Juridical
  32. 23 Tolerance and the Legitimacy of Law
  33. 24 Justice, Primary Goods and Public Reason
  34. 25 The Ethics of Whistleblowing
  35. 26 Practical Wisdom in Confucian Philosophy
  36. 27 The Challenges of Cognitive Science to Philosophy
  37. 28 On “Intentionality” and “Meta- Intentionality” in Eastern and Western Philosophies of Consciousness
  38. 29 Marx’s Theory of the Historical Path and its Commitment to Concretization
  39. 30 Characteristics of Chinese Philosophy and the Chinese National Spirit
  40. 31 Utopisches Denken in der Chinesischen Gegenwartsphilosophie
  41. Bio-Bibliography
  42. Name Index
https://doi.org/10.1515/yewph-2016-0014

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Editorial Preface
  3. Contents
  4. 1 Preface
  5. 2 The Current Situation of Chinese Philosophy: Problems and Tasks
  6. 3 Chinese Philosophy – Philosophy in China
  7. I Public Sphere and Globalization
  8. 4 The Publicity of Reason(ing)
  9. 5 Digitalization: Another Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere?
  10. II Fundamental Philosophical Questions in Public Sphere
  11. 6 Pluralism, Autonomy and Public Deliberation
  12. 7 Kant on the Public Sphere and Some Reflections on Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Intercultural Discussion
  13. 8 The Public Sphere and the Faculty of Judgment: Hannah Arendt’s Theses on Public Opinion
  14. 9 On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast Between Téchne and Túche – A Comparison Between Arendt and Heidegger
  15. 10 Habermas on Instrumental Reasoning in Public Sphere
  16. III Public Sphere and Ethics
  17. 11 Republicity
  18. 12 Changing the Imperial Mindset
  19. 13 Communicative Power and the Public Sphere
  20. IV The Problem of Public Sphere in Asian Cultures
  21. 14 Public Sphere and Open Society from the Perspective of Axial Age China
  22. 15 How to Jointly Decide What Ought to Be Done?
  23. 16 The Confucian Concept of “Cheng” (Integrity) in Relation to Publicity and Justice
  24. V Public Sphere and Democracy
  25. 17 National and International Public Spheres and the Protection of Human Rights
  26. 18 International Justice and the Limit of Public Reason
  27. 19 Privacy and/in the Public Sphere
  28. 20 Context, Perspective and Research Method: Several Problems of the Research on Publicness
  29. VI Publicity and Justice
  30. 21 Origins of Justice Theory in China and West
  31. 22 Representation, Political and Juridical
  32. 23 Tolerance and the Legitimacy of Law
  33. 24 Justice, Primary Goods and Public Reason
  34. 25 The Ethics of Whistleblowing
  35. 26 Practical Wisdom in Confucian Philosophy
  36. 27 The Challenges of Cognitive Science to Philosophy
  37. 28 On “Intentionality” and “Meta- Intentionality” in Eastern and Western Philosophies of Consciousness
  38. 29 Marx’s Theory of the Historical Path and its Commitment to Concretization
  39. 30 Characteristics of Chinese Philosophy and the Chinese National Spirit
  40. 31 Utopisches Denken in der Chinesischen Gegenwartsphilosophie
  41. Bio-Bibliography
  42. Name Index
Downloaded on 26.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2016-0014/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button