Lectures on Religious Belief and the epistemology of disagreements

Victoria Lavorerio

doi:10.1515/witt-2021-0012

Artikel

Lectures on Religious Belief and the epistemology of disagreements

Victoria Lavorerio

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. Februar 2021

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift Wittgenstein-Studien Band 12 Heft 1

Abstract

The influence of Wittgenstein’s work in the study of deep disagreements has been dominated by On Certainty. Since the metaphor of ‘hinges’ plays a central role in the scholarship of On Certainty, a Wittgensteinian theory of deep disagreements is assumed to be based on hinge epistemology. This means that a disagreement would be deep because it concerns parties with conflicting hinges. When we shift our attention to a different part of Wittgenstein’s oeuvre, however, another picture of deep disagreements emerges. This article proposes a new Wittgensteinian approach to disagreements through the analysis of the Lectures on Religious Belief. Some of the disagreements that Wittgenstein and his pupils discuss in these lectures are deep, but not because they are grounded in different hinges, but because they are disagreements about pictures.^[1]

Bibliography

Amesbury, Richard: Fideism, in: Edward N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/fideism/>.[Retrieved 23. 01. 2020].Suche in Google Scholar

Barrett, Cyril: Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Belief, Oxford 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora: Wittgenstein on religious belief: The gulfs between us, in: D. Z. Phillips & M. von der Ruhr (Eds.): Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy, Aldershot 2005. 99 – 138.10.4324/9781315244761-4Suche in Google Scholar

Egan, David: Pictures in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, in: Philosophical Investigations, 34.1 (2011), 55 – 76.10.1111/j.1467-9205.2010.01426.xSuche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Richard: Reasonable Religious Disagreements, in: Louise Antony (ed.): Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular, Oxford 2007, 194 – 214.10.1093/oso/9780195173079.003.0016Suche in Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert: The Logic of Deep Disagreements, in: Informal Logic, 7.1 (1985). Reprinted in: Informal Logic 25 (2005), 3 – 11.10.22329/il.v25i1.1040Suche in Google Scholar

Godden, David & Brenner, William: Wittgenstein and the logic of deep disagreement, in: Cogency, 2 (2010), 41 – 80.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Sandford: Inclusiveness in the face of anticipated disagreement, in: Synthese, 190.7 (2013), 1189 – 1207.10.1007/s11229-012-0102-2Suche in Google Scholar

Kusch, Martin: Wittgenstein on Mathematics and certainties, in: International Journal for the Study of Scepticism, 6.2 – 3 (2016), 120 – 142.10.1163/22105700-00603004Suche in Google Scholar

Kusch, Martin: Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Peer Disagreement. (unpublished) http://www.academia.edu/1517295/Wittgenstein_and_the_Epistemology_of_Peer_Disagreement [retrieved 18. 5. 2016]Suche in Google Scholar

Lavorerio, Victoria: Do deep disagreements motivate relativism?, in: Topoi, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245 – 018 – 9558 – 0; 2018a.Suche in Google Scholar

Lavorerio, Victoria: Pictures in Wittgenstein's Treatment of Disagreement in the So-Called Lectures on Religious Belief, in: Bernhard Ritter, Gabriele Mras und & Paul Weingartner (Hg.): Philosophie der Logik und Mathematik: Beiträge des 41. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums, Kirchberg am Wechsel 2018b, 135 – 138.Suche in Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle: Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty, Basingstoke 2004.10.1057/9780230504462Suche in Google Scholar

Munz, Volker & Ritter, Bernhard: Wittgenstein’s Whewell’s Court Lectures, Cambridge, 1938 – 1941, from the Notes by Yorick Smythies, Chichester 2017.10.1002/9781119166399Suche in Google Scholar

Pritchard, Duncan: Defusing Epistemic Relativism, in: Synthese, 166.2 (2009), 397 – 412.10.1007/s11229-007-9278-2Suche in Google Scholar

Pritchard, Duncan: Epistemic Relativism and Wittgensteinian Epistemology, in: Steven D. Hales (ed.): A Companion to Relativism, Chichester 2011, 266 – 285.10.1002/9781444392494.ch14Suche in Google Scholar

Pritchard, Duncan: Disagreements, of beliefs and otherwise, in: Casey Johnson (ed.): Voicing Dissent, London 2018a, 22 – 39.10.4324/9781315181189-3Suche in Google Scholar

Pritchard, Duncan: Wittgensteinian Hinge Epistemology and Deep Disagreement, in: Topoi 2018b (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245 – 018 – 9612-y)10.1007/s11245-018-9612-ySuche in Google Scholar

Ranalli, Chris: Deep Disagreement and Hinge Epistemology, in: Synthese (2018), doi.org/10.1007/s11229 – 018 – 01956 – 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia: A Confusion of the Spheres. Wittgenstein and Kierkegaard on Philosophy and Religion, Oxford 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199229826.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia: Wittgenstein and the ‘factorisation model’ of religious belief”, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 6.1 (2014), 93 – 110.10.24204/ejpr.v6i1.193Suche in Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia: ‘Hinge propositions’ and the ‘logical’ exclusion of doubt, in: International Journal for the Study of Scepticism, 6.2 – 3 (2016),165 – 181.10.1163/22105700-00603006Suche in Google Scholar

Stroll, Avrum: Moore and Wittgenstein on certainty, Oxford 1994.10.1093/oso/9780195084887.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Michael: Wittgenstein’s refutation of idealism, in: Denis McManus (ed.): Wittgenstein and scepticism, London 2003.10.4324/9780203467794-3Suche in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2021-02-03

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2021-0012