Home Lebensform and “socio-cultural background”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lebensform and “socio-cultural background”

The Wittgensteinian inspirations in the philosophical anthropology of Charles Taylor
  • Marcin Baran
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract:

The main part of the philosophical activity of Charles Taylor may be characterized as philosophical anthropology. This philosophical anthropology is above all an attempt to overcome what he calls the epistemological construal i. e. a set of false anthropological beliefs spread in the modern western philosophy like: disengaged subject, the punctual self and social atomism. His critique of the anthropological beliefs draws, among other thinkers, heavily on Ludwig Wittgenstein's reflections on language and his social nature in Philosophical Investigations. To the disengaged subject and punctual self Taylor opposes the embodied subject, a human agent that is impossible to define without his language depending entirely on the “form of life”, an inescapable social context in which he is embedded. Thus Taylor emphasizes the basic connection between the self and the community, which is being falsely compromised by social atomism. This emphasis on the community, on the essential role of the link between individual and his social environment rank him among so called communitarians, the critics of the predominant individualistic liberal way of thinking. In his more recent works, especially A Secular Age Taylor reflects on the phenomenon of secularization of the modern West. Here the notion, inspired partially by Wittgenstein, of “background” – an implicit framework for the beliefs of an agent – plays an important role. The following text will show more in detail the most important Wittgensteinian inspirations in the philosophical reflection of Charles Taylor considering modern western culture.

Bibliography

Aristotle: Politics, William Ross (ed.), Oxford 1957.10.1093/oseo/instance.00259280Search in Google Scholar

Descartes, René: Discourse on Method and Meditations, Laurence Lafleur (transl.), New York 1960.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin: The Age of World Picture, in: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, William Lovitt (transl.), New York1977.Search in Google Scholar

Somavilla, Ιlse: The Dimension of Silence in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, in: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: PHI2014 – 1076, Athens 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge 1985.10.1017/CBO9781139173483Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Language and Human Nature, in: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge 1985a.10.1017/CBO9781139173483Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Theories of meaning, in: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge 1985b.10.1017/CBO9781139173483Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge1989.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Overcoming Epistemology, in: Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge 1995a.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: The Validity of Transcendental Arguments, in: Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge 1995b.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Lichtung or Lebensform: Parallels between Heidegger and Wittgenstein, in:Search in Google Scholar

Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge 1995c.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: The Importance of Herder, in: Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge 1995d.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: A Secular Age, Cambridge 2007.10.4159/9780674044289Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles: Language Not Mysterious?, in: Dilemmas and Connections, Cambridge 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2018-2-21

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/witt-2018-0006/html
Scroll to top button