Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Was Wittgenstein really a Constructivist about Mathematics?

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Februar 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

It will be argued that Wittgenstein did not outright reject the law of excluded middle for mathematics or the proof-techniques that constructivists reject in connection with the law of excluded middle. Wittgenstein can be seen to be critical of the dogmatic claims of Brouwer and Weyl concerning how proofs should be constructed. Rather than himself laying down a requirement concerning what is and is not a proof, Wittgenstein can be read as exploring the differences between constructive and non-constructive proofs. I will read Wittgenstein as arguing that Brouwer’s rejection of excluded middle is based upon an over-extension from examples that Wittgenstein reads as special cases. Wittgenstein is certainly interested in the difference between constructive and non-constructive proof but only for the purposes of exploring the easily-missed differences between the two, not in order to reject non-constructive approaches.

Online erschienen: 2016-2-20
Erschienen im Druck: 2016-2-1

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/witt-2016-0107/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen