Home Patients with post-COVID-19 vaccination facial palsy: To boost or not to boost?
Article Open Access

Patients with post-COVID-19 vaccination facial palsy: To boost or not to boost?

  • Nicola Cirillo ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Massimiliano Orlandi and Giuseppe Colella
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A possible association between Bell’s palsy and COVID-19 vaccination has been suggested. While it is likely that COVID-19 vaccine recipients from the general population do have a slightly increased risk of developing Bell’s palsy, there are little data regarding this risk in individuals with a history of disease. Gaining a better understanding of this association is particularly important for informing evidence-based recommendations regarding future booster shots in subjects who developed Bell’s palsy as a side effect of vaccination, or as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We previously described the first case of COVID-19 vaccine-related Bell’s palsy; here we report an 18-month clinical and electromyographic follow-up and discuss the implications of receiving further vaccine doses in patients with positive disease history.

1 Introduction

The development of COVID-19 vaccines in record time has allowed the world to gradually return to almost normal conditions. Although the benefits of vaccination clearly outweigh the possible risks, it is imperative to continue to accurately monitor and report side effects that may arise. To date, a wide spectrum of rare neurological complications has been reported following COVID-19 vaccination [1], including Bell’s palsy and other functional neurological disorders that can mimic facial palsy [2].

In January 2021, we reported a case of an otherwise healthy 37-year-old white Caucasian male who developed acute unilateral facial palsy within days after first injection of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 [3]. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first fully documented case of Bell’s palsy ever reported in a COVID-19 vaccine recipient post-marketing and, as such, has been widely cited in influent medical journals [4,5,6].

Following the publication of this case [3] to date, we were contacted by members of the public and colleagues from across the world. They fuelled a debate that was instrumental in raising awareness of this condition in the peer-reviewed scientific literature [7]. With regard to our own patient, the recurring questions that we were asked were the following: (1) Has your patient recovered? (2) Did he receive the second dose and, if so, what vaccine was used and when was it administered?

2 Case

Following an acute phase that was characterised by paralysis (House–Brackmann score V) and pain, our patient was treated with prednisone (50 mg/day) and slowly underwent resolution of pain, as detailed by us previously [3]. Two months after the episode, electromyography (EMG) confirmed a significant asymmetry in the magnitude of the M response. Specifically, there was a residual deficit in orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles, with fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waives in some points and a moderate number of increased motor unit potential duration (MUPD).

In the follow-up checks, reduction of pain score was paralleled by a progressive improvement of facial mobility and disappearance of lagophthalmos at rest by September 2021. On December 2021, a further improvement with an almost complete clinical resolution was observed, except for a residual mobility deficit of left labial commissure and eyebrow. On a telephone follow up in March 2022, all self-reported symptoms of paralysis had apparently resolved. However, when the patient was examined at a follow-up check in July 2022, clinical assessment revealed a residual asymmetry in the wrinkles when corrugating eyebrows as well as left eyelid synkinesis upon blowing (Figure 1). EMG showed no abnormal activity at rest; however, a slight reduction of motor unit recruitment was noted during contraction. A moderate number of increased MUPD and significant presence of polyphasic potentials were also found. Overall, this electroneuromyographic picture was suggestive of mild axonal damage.

Figure 1 
               Clinical examination revealed residual asymmetry of facial mobility in our patient. Panel (a) shows patient’s facial mimic at rest. He was then asked to corrugate both eyebrows (b), smile (c), wide open eyes (d), flatten eyebrows (e), and blow out (f).
Figure 1

Clinical examination revealed residual asymmetry of facial mobility in our patient. Panel (a) shows patient’s facial mimic at rest. He was then asked to corrugate both eyebrows (b), smile (c), wide open eyes (d), flatten eyebrows (e), and blow out (f).

Throughout the vaccination campaign, our patient opted not to take a second dose of any vaccine because of the risk of recurrence, and hence was exempted from COVID-19 vaccination.

  1. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from the patient included in this study.

3 Discussion

Although the association between Bell’s palsy and COVID-19 or other vaccines is now well established [8,9], data regarding the risk of developing facial paralysis after COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with positive history of disease are scanty. This is partly due to the fact that people with previous episodes of facial palsy, including those who developed this condition after vaccination, are usually excluded from further analysis in most observational studies while only newly diagnosed cases are included. In particular, a common assumption is made in the study design that the event should be independently recurrent such that each occurrence does not affect subsequent events. However, facial palsies might occur recurrently and are likely to increase the probability of future episodes, which might violate the assumption of event independence.

One study from Israel specifically looked at the risk of Bell’s palsy in individuals receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and who had reported at least one episode in the last 5 years [10]. The authors found an increased risk of post-vaccination Bell’s palsy, particularly after the second dose. Briefly, in patients with previous history of Bell’s palsy, 4 cases were reported in 7,567 vaccines and 10 cases in 7,045 vaccines within 21 and 30 days after the first and the second dose, respectively. Therefore, 14 cases of Bell’s palsy occurred among 7,567 individuals who had at least one vaccine dose, compared to 8 cases of Bell’s palsy expected on the basis of the estimate from the incidence recorded in the study population in 2019 [10].

It is important to appreciate that the risk of developing facial palsy is much higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination. In a recently published large epidemiological study [11], the authors used publicly available data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which included over 300 million COVID vaccine doses administered during the study timeframe, and showed that the rate of neurological events after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was up to 617-fold higher than after COVID vaccination [11]. Another large self-controlled case series study analysing the data from the English National Immunisation Database found that although there was an increased risk of Bell’s palsy in those who received COVID-19 vaccines, the risk of this complication was much larger following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (incidence rate ratio, 33.23; 95% CI: 22.57–48.94 at baseline) [5]. However, these data should not erroneously lead us to assume that COVID-19 vaccination must be recommended to patients with previous episodes of facial palsy. This is particularly relevant for the COVID-19 vaccine booster campaigns that are likely to take place in the foreseeable future. Imposition of vaccine mandates (or strong recommendation in favour of vaccination) has important regulatory, clinical, and public health implications, especially when serious side effects of vaccination are well known and no thorough risk–benefit evaluations have been performed. In fact, there is a substantially different likelihood of contracting SARS-CoV-2 or developing symptomatic COVID-19 in different population groups, for example in terms of occupational risk and age, respectively [12]. Therefore, recommending further COVID-19 vaccine shots to individuals at low risk of severe illness and with previous history of Bell’s palsy might not be justified.

Bell’s palsy usually self-resolves within weeks or months, and early treatment with systemic corticosteroids significantly improves the chances of complete recovery [13]. In one large cohort from Northern Europe, 85% of the patients’ function was returned within 3 weeks and in the remaining 15% after 3–5 months [14]. However, mimics can be affected and minor sequelae may be observed in the long term [14]. Anecdotal cases of unilateral facial palsy in patients with history of recurrent Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination with inactivated virus [15] as well as mRNA-based products [16] have been described. Yu et al. reported that patient symptoms began to improve by day 7 and resolved by day 54 [15]. In the case described by Repajic et al. [16], symptoms began to improve by day 14 but no further follow-up was reported.

One and a half years from initial presentation, our patient still presented minor motor deficits. Hence, the possible consequences of vaccine-associated Bell’s palsy should not be underestimated as this condition may harbour long-lasting sequelae.


tel: +61-03-9341-1473, fax: +61-03-9341-1473

  1. Funding information: The authors received no funding.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interests.

  3. Data availability statement: Datasets are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

[1] Garg RK, Paliwal VK. Spectrum of neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:3–40.10.1007/s10072-021-05662-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ercoli T, Lutzoni L, Orofino G, Muroni A, Defazio G. Functional neurological disorder after COVID-19 vaccination. Neurol Sci. 2021;42:3989–90.10.1007/s10072-021-05504-8Search in Google Scholar

[3] Colella G, Orlandi M, Cirillo N. Bell’s palsy following COVID-19 vaccination. J Neurol. 2021;268:3589–91.10.1007/s00415-021-10462-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Barda N, Dagan N, Ben-Shlomo Y, Kepten E, Waxman J, Ohana R, et al. Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1078–90.10.1056/NEJMoa2110475Search in Google Scholar

[5] Patone M, Handunnetthi L, Saatci D, Pan J, Katikireddi SV, Razvi S, et al. Neurological complications after first dose of COVID-19 vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021;27:2144–53.10.1038/s41591-021-01556-7Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ng JH, Tan EK. Caution in interpreting facial paralysis data to understand COVID-19 vaccination risks. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:1420.10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4333Search in Google Scholar

[7] Cirillo N, Doan R. Bell’s palsy and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines-an unfolding story. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:1210–1.10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00273-5Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wan EYF, Chui CSL, Lai FTT, Chan EWY, Li X, Yan VKC, et al. Bell’s palsy following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a case series and nested case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:64–72.10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00451-5Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cirillo N, Doan R. The association between COVID-19 vaccination and Bell’s palsy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:5–6.10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00467-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] Shibli R, Barnett O, Abu-Full Z, Gronich N, Najjar-Debbiny R, Doweck I, et al. Association between vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and Bell’s palsy: a population-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;11:100236. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Frontera JA, Tamborska AA, Doheim MF, Garcia-Azorin D, Gezegen H, Guekht A, et al. Neurological events reported after COVID-19 vaccines: an analysis of VAERS. Ann Neurol. 2022;91:756–71.10.1002/ana.26339Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cirillo N. Do health-care workers need a COVID-19 vaccine booster? Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:20.10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00782-9Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sullivan FM, Swan IR, Donnan PT, Morrison JM, Smith BH, McKinstry B, et al. Early treatment with prednisolone or acyclovir in Bell’s palsy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1598–607.10.1056/NEJMoa072006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Peitersen E. Bell’s palsy: the spontaneous course of 2,500 peripheral facial nerve palsies of different etiologies. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002;549:4–30.10.1080/000164802760370736Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yu BY, Cen LS, Chen T, Yang TH. Bell’s palsy after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination in a patient with history of recurrent Bell’s palsy: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9:8274–9.10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8274Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Repajic M, Lai XL, Xu P, Liu A. Bell’s Palsy after second dose of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination in a patient with history of recurrent Bell’s palsy. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021;13:100217.10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100217Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-03-28
Revised: 2022-08-02
Accepted: 2022-08-08
Published Online: 2022-08-22

© 2022 Nicola Cirillo et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Mice can recognise water depths and will avoid entering deep water
  3. CLSPCOL rescues Alzheimer’s disease mouse models
  4. Ischemic stroke following STA–MCA double bypass
  5. Relationship between subclasses low-density lipoprotein and carotid plaque
  6. Construction and effect evaluation of different sciatic nerve injury models in rats
  7. Effects of propofol on neuroblastoma cells via the HOTAIRM1/miR-519a-3p axis
  8. Effects of Goldblatt hypertension on rats’ hippocampal cholinergic system
  9. Longitudinal PET studies of mGluR5 in FXS using an FMR1 knockout mouse model
  10. Molecular recognition of the interaction between ApoE and the TREM2 protein
  11. Remimazolam induced cognitive dysfunction in mice via glutamate excitotoxicity
  12. Hybrid 18F-florbetapir PET/MRI for assessing myelin recovery in GFAP-A patients
  13. Preliminary study on pathogenic mechanism of first Chinese family with PNKD
  14. Aged rats learn Morris Water maze using non-spatial search strategies evidenced by a parameter-based algorithm
  15. Embelin and levodopa combination therapy for improved Parkinson’s disease treatment
  16. The roles and diagnostic value of miRNA-1246 in the serum of patients with intracranial aneurysms
  17. Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
  18. The effect of stimulation frequency on transcranial evoked potentials
  19. Increased levels of neurofilament light chain in suicide attempters’ serum
  20. Propofol ameliorates ischemic brain injury by blocking TLR4 pathway in mice
  21. Single-cell analysis of gene expression in the substantia nigra pars compacta of a pesticide-induced mouse model of Parkinson’s disease
  22. Psychobiotics improve propionic acid-induced neuroinflammation in juvenile rats, rodent model of autism
  23. Isoliquiritigenin attenuates neuroinflammation in mice model of Parkinson’s disease by promoting Nrf2/NQO-1 pathway
  24. Ketamine alleviating depressive-like behaviors is associated with regulation of nNOS–CAPON–Dexras1 complex in chronic unpredictable mild stress rats
  25. The association of anxiety and other clinical features with CACNA1C rs1006737 in patients with depression
  26. Outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in kidney transplant recipients: An analysis of US Nationwide inpatient sample
  27. Brain atrophy pattern in patients with mild cognitive impairment: MRI study
  28. Correlation of serum RBP4 level with oxidative stress and unstable carotid plaque in patients with cerebral infarction
  29. Prevalence of neurodegenerative/demyelinating disorders in patients with achalasia
  30. Protection against H2O2-evoked toxicity in HT22 hippocampal neuronal cells by geissoschizine methyl ether via inhibiting ERK pathway
  31. Alteration in NMDAR subunits in different brain regions of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat model
  32. Acacetin improves cognitive function of APP/PS1 Alzheimer’s disease model mice via the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway
  33. Assessment of malformations, variations and diameters of vessels forming the circle of Willis – An autopsy study in a non-cerebrovascular cohort
  34. Singular versus combinatory glucose-sensitive signal control of metabolic sensor protein profiles in hypothalamic astrocyte cultures from each sex
  35. Mild acute stress prevents the memory impairment induced by long-term isoflurane anesthesia
  36. Esketamine improves propofol-induced brain injury and cognitive impairment in rats
  37. Correlations between EEG and intestinal electrical stimulation
  38. Factors influencing recovery of upper limb motor function during constraint-induced movement therapy for people with stroke
  39. Application of auditory mismatch negativity in tinnitus patients based on high-resolution electroencephalogram signals
  40. The value of transcranial Doppler monitoring of cerebral blood flow changes during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia – A case series
  41. Acacetin alleviates neuroinflammation and oxidative stress injury via the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in a mouse model of spinal cord injury
  42. Pre-ischemic exercise prevents inflammation and apoptosis by inhibiting MAPK pathway in ischemic stroke
  43. Fronto-parietal single-trial brain connectivity benefits successful memory recognition
  44. Review Articles
  45. Machine learning approaches for diagnosing depression using EEG: A review
  46. Perinatal diet and offspring anxiety: A scoping review
  47. Brain and gut microbiota disorders in the psychopathology of anorexia nervosa
  48. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery for the treatment of CNS disorders
  49. Case Reports
  50. A rare giant intracranial arachnoid cyst confused the diagnosis and treatment of Wilson disease
  51. Cerebral infarction following bee stings: Case report and literature review
  52. Neurosarcoidosis presenting as longitudinally extensive myelitis: Diagnostic assessment, differential diagnosis, and therapeutic approach
  53. Long-acting paliperidone in Ekbom’s syndrome in Lewy body dementia: A case report
  54. Patients with post-COVID-19 vaccination facial palsy: To boost or not to boost?
  55. Autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy associated with a novel mutation of KCNT1
  56. A rare brainstem anaplastic astrocytoma
  57. A singular case of hyposmia and transient audiovestibular post-vaccine disorders: case report and literature review
  58. A rare lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma involving the dura of the skull base and cervical spinal cord: A case report
  59. Communication
  60. The system’s genetics of depression and its somatic and mental comorbidities
  61. Commentary
  62. The possible association between neurodegenerative/demyelinating neurological disorders in achalasia patients
  63. Letter to the Editor
  64. A patient with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis involving multiple cranial nerves due to a rare p.(Phe84Ser) variant
  65. Erratum
  66. Erratum to “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 40: A case report and literature review”
  67. Erratum to “Construction and effect evaluation of different sciatic nerve injury models in rats”
  68. Retraction
  69. Nervonic acid amends motor disorder in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease
  70. Retraction of “Isovitexin modulates autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease via miR-107 signalling”
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0240/html
Scroll to top button