Abstract
Passivization and non-active voice in Iranian languages are so challenging that it has led some researchers to deny the existence of passive voice in Farsi as the most studied modern Iranian language. In this study, various Kurdish, Bakhtiari, and Farsi data confirm the existence of non-active voices, including passive structures, in the family of Iranian languages. This paper examines the derivation of synthetic and analytic non-active constructions in these neighboring Iranian languages. Studying various non-active structures in the light of Alexiadou and Doron (2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48. 1–34), as well as the constructivist approach (Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Hale, Kenneth L. & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge: MIT Press; Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168 and others), we argue that it is plausible to account for these seemingly different structures uniformly. In our view, synthetic and analytical non-active voices share the same underlying structure and derivation, and their morpho-syntactic differences results from the combination of roots with different heads. To account for the observed diversity in non-active formation, the paper adopts the Concatenation Rule (Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton: 178) and labels it as the Affixation Rule. To comply with the Affixation Rule, there can be no phasic head between the roots and non-active heads. Accordingly, the synthetic non-active voices result from the locality of [+v] roots and non-active heads. In the formation of analytic non-active voices, on the other hand, n or a heads act as blocking phase heads and prevent the affixation of the non-active heads with the roots.
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226711000338.Suche in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schaefer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110197723.4.187Suche in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Anoushe, Mazdak. 2015. Passive structure in Persian: A minimalist approach. Language Research 6(1). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2015.56604.Suche in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagait. 2005. Structuring sense, volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Browne, William. 1970. More on definiteness marker: Interrogatives in Persian. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 359–563.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, Massachuses: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), KenHale. A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, Massachuses: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 1985. The Persian passive. Journal of Linguistics 3. 31–46.Suche in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502569Suche in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Zenon Pylyshyn. 2015. Minds without meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262027908.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila. 1996. Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. PhD Dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.Suche in Google Scholar
Hajati, Abdol-Khalil. 1977. Ke-constructions in Persian: Descriptive and theoretical aspects. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Urbana: University of Illinois.Suche in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. In the series Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 39. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2017. The bundling hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Jakendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin. 1990. Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions. Linguistic Analysis 20(3/4). 139–191.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin. 2005. A minimalist approach to scrambling, evidence from Persian. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199796Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein. 1997. Light verb constructions in Persian. PhD Dissertation. England: Essex University.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein. 2005. Light verbs and structural case. Lingua 115. 1737–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein & Fatemeh Daneshpazhooh. 2019. Kurdish –ra as an anti-actor marker. In Songül Gundugdo, Ergin Opengin, Geoffrey Haig & Erik Anoby (eds.), Current issues in Kurdish linguistics. Hamburg University Press.10.20378/irb-56763Suche in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Suche in Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika. 2005. In the middle, somewhat elevated: The semantics of middles and its cross-linguistic realization. London: University of London dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1997. Persian. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, vol. 4, 201–225.Suche in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2001. “Words and things” handout. Cambridge: MIT.Suche in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012.Suche in Google Scholar
Mohammad, Jan & Karimi Simin. 1992. Light verbs are taken over: Complex verbs in Persian. Proceedings of WECOL 5. 195–212.Suche in Google Scholar
Moyne, John. 1974. The so-called passive in Persian. Foundations of Language 12. 249–267.Suche in Google Scholar
Oikonomou, Despina & Artemis Alexiadou. 2022. Voice syncretism crosslinguistically: The view from minimalism. Philosophies 7. 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7010019.Suche in Google Scholar
Oseki, Yohei. 2017. Voice morphology in Japanese argument structures. Ms., Dessertation. New York University. lingbuzz/003374.Suche in Google Scholar
Palmer, Adrian. 1971. The ezafe construction in modern standard Persian. PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan.Suche in Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229.Suche in Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Suche in Google Scholar
Soheili-Isfahani, Abolghasem. 1976. Noun phrase complementation in Persian. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Urbana: University of Illinios.Suche in Google Scholar
Vahedi-Langrudi, Mohammad Mahdi. 1996. The syntax, semantics, and argument structure of complex predicates in modern Farsi. PhD Dissertation. University of Ottawa.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.Jr. 2007. Exploring the syntax-semantic interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wood, Jim. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure studies. In Studies natural language and linguistic theory. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9Suche in Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Tapio Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical voice. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316671399Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Non-active voices in Iranian languages: the case of Farsi, Kurdish and Baxtiari
- The negative indefinite nuddu ‘no one’ as a floating quantifier in Sicilian
- Resultative properties of stage-level predicates in Catalan: a study of perfective adjectives
- The typology of the distributional restrictions of a feature: occlusion and bipositionality
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Non-active voices in Iranian languages: the case of Farsi, Kurdish and Baxtiari
- The negative indefinite nuddu ‘no one’ as a floating quantifier in Sicilian
- Resultative properties of stage-level predicates in Catalan: a study of perfective adjectives
- The typology of the distributional restrictions of a feature: occlusion and bipositionality