Abstract
Chinese, a topic-prominent language, abounds with gapped and gapless topic constructions. Several explanations of how topics are derived have been proposed, which fall into three categories: the base-generation approach, the mixed approach and the movement approach. In this study, we conducted two experiments to examine the island sensitivity of topic constructions in Chinese, bringing novel evidence to adjudicate the different approaches to topicalization in this language. The results indicate that island effects can be detected in both gapped and gapless topic constructions, which supports the movement approach to topic constructions in Chinese, making influential hypotheses such as the topic licensing condition and the topic interpretation condition dubious. Our findings also provide new evidence for the influential proposal that Merge is applied freely (Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz & Ken Hale (eds.), A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press, Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49).
Acknowledgment
We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to Harry van der Hulst and the reviewers of The Linguistic Review for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions.
References
Almeida, Diogo. 2014. Subliminal wh-islands in Brazilian Portuguese and the consequences for syntactic theory. Revista da ABRALIN 13(2). 55–91. https://doi.org/10.5380/rabl.v13i2.39611.Suche in Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Lina Choueiri & Norbert Hornstein. 2001. Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372504.Suche in Google Scholar
Bassong, Paul Roger. 2021. Mismatching nominals and the small clause hypothesis. Journal of Linguistics 57. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222672000050x.Suche in Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. A tale of two minimalisms: Reflections on the plausibility of crash-proof syntax, and its free-merge alternative. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.06boeSuche in Google Scholar
Bondevik, Ingrid, Dave Kush & Terje Lohndal. 2021. Variation in adjunct islands: The case of Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44. 223–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586520000207.Suche in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2016. On the timing of labeling: Deducing comp-trace effects, the subject condition the adjunct condition, and tucking in from labeling. The Linguistic Review 33. 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0013.Suche in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2007. A few lessons from typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2007.024.Suche in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Zhong, Yuhang Xu & Zhiguo Xie. 2020. Assessing introspective linguistic judgments quantitatively: The case of the syntax of Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29. 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09210-y.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz & Ken Hale (eds.), A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics (Special issue). 229–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288.Suche in Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1982. Restrictions on unbounded dependencies in Swedish. In Elisabet Engdahl & Eva Ejerhed (eds.), Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, 151–174. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Suche in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl.2007.020.Suche in Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda. 2005. Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review 22. 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.365.Suche in Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward & Evelina Fedorenko. 2013. The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(1–2). 88–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080.Suche in Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2021. Resumptive pronouns in English. In Grant Goodall (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax, 211–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108569620.009Suche in Google Scholar
Hu, Jianhua & Haihua Pan. 2009. Decomposing the aboutness condition for Chinese topic constructions. The Linguistic Review 26. 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.014.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logic relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 2000. Between syntax and semantics. London and New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Nick. 2019. Variation and learnability in constraints on A-bar movement. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1996. Recent generative studies on Chinese syntax. In Cheng-Teh James Huang & Yen-hui Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons of Chinese linguistics, 49–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_3Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James, Yen-hui Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Ray Rui-heng & Jen Ting. 2006. Are there dangling topics in Mandarin Chinese? Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32(1). 119–146.Suche in Google Scholar
Keshev, Maayan & Aya Meltzer-Asscher. 2017. Active dependency formation in islands: How grammatical resumption affects sentence processing. Language 93. 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0036.Suche in Google Scholar
Keshev, Maayan & Aya Meltzer-Asscher. 2019. A processing-based account of subliminal wh-island effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37. 621–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9416-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 573–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407588.Suche in Google Scholar
Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2019. On the island sensitivity of topicalization in topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95(3). 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0237.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey & Wei Wei. 2019. Determining structures without morphological clues: Chinese adverbial phrases with apparent clausal complements. Paper presented at 12th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, University of Macau, 9–10, July.Suche in Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14. 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Linzen, Tal & Yohei Oseki. 2018. The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.528.Suche in Google Scholar
Lu, Jiayi, Cynthia Thompson & Masaya Yoshida. 2020. Chinese Wh-in-situ and islands: A formal judgment study. Linguistic Inquiry 51. 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00343.Suche in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2005. Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. Linguistic Review 22. 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429.Suche in Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana & Wayne Cowart. 1999. Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70. B15–B24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00006-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Narita, Hiroki & Naoki Fukui. 2022. Symmetrizing syntax: Merge, minimality, and equilibria. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315671901Suche in Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis. 2010. Grammaticality, interfaces, and UG. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.05ottSuche in Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis. 2015. Symmetric merge and local instability: Evidence from split topics. Syntax 18. 157–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12027.Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2016. Resumptivity in Mandarin Chinese: A minimalist account. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110492385Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua & Jianhua Hu. 2008. A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1966–1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Pañeda, Claudia, Sol Lago, Elena Vares, João Veríssimo & Claudia Felser. 2020. Island effects in Spanish comprehension. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1058.Suche in Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 2010. Should we impeach armchair linguists? Japanese/Korean Linguistics 17. 49–64.Suche in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0010Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 1992. The nature of topic comment constructions and topic chains. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76. 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0070.Suche in Google Scholar
Sichel, Ivy. 2014. Resumptive pronouns and competition. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00169.Suche in Google Scholar
Sichel, Ivy. 2018. Anatomy of a counterexample: Extraction from relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 49. 335–378. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00275.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon. 2007. A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s core syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48. 609–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226712000011.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2017. Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Ivano Caponigro, Ciro Greco & Carlo Cecchetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Shin Fukuda, Hajime Ono & Robert Kluender. 2011. Reverse island effects and the backward search for a licensor in multiple wh-questions. Syntax 14. 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00153.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Carson T. Schütze & Diogo Almeida. 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134. 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Matt Wagers & Colin Phillips. 2012. A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88. 82–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0004.Suche in Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED: Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10. 80–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur, Manca Mušič & Penka Stateva. 2018. Two (non-) islands in Slovenian: A study in experimental syntax. Linguistics 56(3). 435–476. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0002.Suche in Google Scholar
Tang, Tingchi. 1977. Studies in transformational grammar of Chinese, 1. Taipei: Student Books Company Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar
Vincent, Jake, Ivy Sichel & Matthew Wagers. 2022. Extraction from English RCs and cross-linguistic similarities in the environments that facilitate extraction. Languages 7. 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020117.Suche in Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer Arnold. 2005. Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 115. 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 75–93.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 2006. Topicalization in Asian languages. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, 137–174. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch73Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Donald Terence Langendoen. 1985. Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/413419.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Danqing Liu. 2007. Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [Topic: Structure and function]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2002. Island effects and episodic eventualities in Chinese topicalization. In Daniel Hole, Paul Law & Niina Zhang (eds.), Linguistics by heart: In honor of Horst-Dieter Gasde, 164–176. Berlin: ZAS-Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- How word stress is realized in Thai: evidence from the ordering of coordinate compounds
- Only states can be gradable
- A syntactic analysis of <no + event deverbal nominalization> in Spanish
- Glottal stop insertion and production planning domains in French
- Chinese topic constructions are derived by movement: evidence from acceptability judgment experiments
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- How word stress is realized in Thai: evidence from the ordering of coordinate compounds
- Only states can be gradable
- A syntactic analysis of <no + event deverbal nominalization> in Spanish
- Glottal stop insertion and production planning domains in French
- Chinese topic constructions are derived by movement: evidence from acceptability judgment experiments