On the properties of null subjects in sign languages: the case of French Sign Language (LSF)

References

Abner, Natasha, Carlo Geraci, Yu Shi, Jessica Lettieri, Justine Mertz & Anah Salgat. 2020. Getting the upper hand on Sign Language families: Historical analysis and annotation methods. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory 3. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.31009/feast.i3.02.Search in Google Scholar

Bahan, Benjamin, Judy Kegl, Robert G. Lee, Dawn Maclaughlin & Carol Neidle. 2000. The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistc Inquiry 31(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554271.Search in Google Scholar

Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari. 2004. Where did all the arguments go? Argument-chaning properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Linguistic Theory 22. 743–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2.Search in Google Scholar

Bertone, Carmela & Anna Cardinaletti. 2011. Il sistema pronominale della lingua dei segni italiana. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 145–160. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.). 2010. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784Search in Google Scholar

Bos, Heleen F. 1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Heleen F. Bos & Trude Schermer (eds.), Sign Language research 1994: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Sign Language research, 121–148. Hamburg, Germany: Signum.Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 1996. Sign languages & language universals: The status of order & position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 91. 101–160. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1996.0018.Search in Google Scholar

Camacho, José A. 2013. Null subjects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524407Search in Google Scholar

Cantin, Yann. 2016. Des Origines du Noétomalalien Français, perspectives Historiques. Glottopol 27. 7–19.Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna. 1990. Impersonal constructions and sentential arguments in German. Padua, Italy: UniPress.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, Chapter 1, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Coerts, Jane. 2000. Early sign combinations in the acquisition of Sign Language of the Netherlands: Evidence for language-specific features. In Charlene Chamberlain, Jill P. Morford & Rachel I. Mayberry (eds.), Language acquisition by eye, 91–109. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Cognola, Federica & Jan Casalicchio (eds.). 2018. Null subjects in generative grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198815853.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2015. Null subjects. In Antonio Fábregas, Jaume Mateu & Michael Putnam (eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters, Chapter 9, 201–226. London: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Langhe, Olivier, Pierre Guitteny, Henri Portine & Christian Retoré. 2004. A propos des structures OSV en langue des signes française. In SILEXICALES, vol. 4, 1–16. France: Villeneuve-d’Ascq.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Gillian Catriona Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press Chapter 9.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, Brigitte, Marie-Anne Sallandre & L’Huillier Marie-Thérèse. 2018. Impersonal human reference in French Sign Language (LSF). Sign Language and Linguistics 21(2). 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00022.gar.Search in Google Scholar

Gilligan, Gary Martin. 1987. A cross-linguistic approach to the pro-drop parameter. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Charlotte. 2019. Subordination in LSF. Paris, France: University of Paris PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 533–564. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. & Barry C.-Y. Yang. 2013. Topic drop and MCP. In The 87th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1–12. Boston, MA. Conference presentation, Jan. 3–6.Search in Google Scholar

Kayabasi, Demet, Hande Sevgi & Sumru A. Özsoy. 2020. Null arguments in Turkish Sign Language. In Asli Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen & Balkiz Öztürk (eds.), Morphological complexity within and across boundaries, 386–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.215.14kaySearch in Google Scholar

Kimmelman, Vadim. 2015. Topics and topic prominence in two sign languages. Journal of Pragmatics 87. 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kimmelman, Vadim. 2018. Null arguments in Russian Sign Language. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory 1. 27–38.Search in Google Scholar

Koulidobrova, Elena. 2017. Elide me bare: Null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(2). 397–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9349-5.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Jeremy, Lara Mantovan & Carlo, Geraci. 2017. Low referentiality in LIS and LSF. In 43rd Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Pavia, 15–17 Feb 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1986. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4(4). 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00134469.Search in Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameter. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-3468-2Search in Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane & Edward S. Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1, 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 95–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.009.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzoni, Laura. 2008. Classificatori e impersonamento nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Pisa, Italy: Pisa University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McKee, Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee & Trevor Johnston. 2011. Variable “subject” presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23(03). 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394511000123.Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit. 1998. Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language & Linguistics 1(1). 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.1.1.03mei.Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2007. Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43(3). 531–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226707004768.Search in Google Scholar

Millet, Agnès. 2019. Grammaire descriptive de la langue des signes française. Dynamiques iconiques et linguistique générale. Grenoble, France: UGA Éditions.10.4000/books.ugaeditions.15959Search in Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Judy A. Kegl, Dawn Maclaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Convergent evidence for rolling up catalan adjectives. Linguistc Inquiry 42(2). 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00044.Search in Google Scholar

Oomen, Marloes. 2017. Iconicity in argument structure: Psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics 20(1). 55–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.03oom.Search in Google Scholar

Oomen, Marloes & Vadim Kimmelman. 2019. Body-anchored verbs and argument omission in two sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 42. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.741.Search in Google Scholar

Padden, Carol A. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California San Diego PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.). 2017. SignGram blueprint: A guide to Sign Language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501511806Search in Google Scholar

Quer, Josep & Joana Rosselló. 2013. On sloppy readings, ellipsis and pronouns. In Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 337–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.197.13queSearch in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110883718Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 501–557.10.4324/9780203461785-6Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, Chapter 1, 58–87. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.002Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 1–57. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Oliver. 1990. Seeing voices. New York, NY, US: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 227(43). 203–227.Search in Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Yuta. 2015. Disjunction as a new diagnostic for (argument) ellipsis. In Thuy Bui & Deniz Ozyildiz (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 45, 15–28. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign Language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910Search in Google Scholar

Santoro, Mirko. 2013. Hierarchical and linear structure: The case of weak crossover in French and Italian Sign Language. Paris: Université de Paris VIII Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Santoro, Mirko, Lara Mantovan, Valentina Aristodemo & Carlo Geraci. 2016. A sociolinguistic view on variable subjects in Italian Sign Language. In Grammar and corpora. Mannheim, Germany. Conference presentation, Nov. 9–11.Search in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction rivisited. Linguistics 25. 511–580. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511.Search in Google Scholar

Schembri, Adam, Kearsy Cormier & Jordan Fenlon. 2018. Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.468.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. 2011. Donkey Anaphora: The view from Sign Language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics & Philosophy 1. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9098-1.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro. 2013. Iconic variables. Linguistics & Philosophy 4. 91–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9129-1.Search in Google Scholar

Sze, Yim-Binh. 2000. Space and nominals in Hong Kong Sign Language. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Daiko. 2006. Apparent parasitic gaps and null arguments in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-2166-1.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Noun phrase ellipsis. In Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 394–422. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0015Search in Google Scholar

Wulf, Alyssa, Paul Dudis, Robert Bayley & Ceil Lucas. 2002. Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies 3(1). 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2002.0027.Search in Google Scholar

Zwitserlood, Inge & Ingeborg Van Gijn. 2006. Agreement phenomena in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Peter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 195–229. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0007Search in Google Scholar