Abstract
In Government Phonology and its descendants, there is a direct relation between representational complexity and lateral strength, as only melodically filled nuclei can discharge government and licensing. This relation is only broken in special circumstances, e.g. when lateral actorship is granted by a systemic parameter. In this paper, I provide a normalisation of lateral actorship by showing that the latter's correlation with complexity also holds for some silent nuclei without introducing a dedicated parameter. The hypothesis is that representational complexity does not necessarily correspond to some phonetic event: a non-empty nucleus can be unpronounced, without this impinging on its lateral actorship. Turbidity Theory provides the formal tools for distinguishing between empty and unpronounced nuclei. This follows from splitting the association between melodic and prosodic units into two independent relations - projection and pronunciation. Empty nuclei lack melodic content, whereas unpronounced nuclei only lack the pronunciation relation. This approach is shown to account for disparate phenomena, such as glide mutation in Classic Arabic, inflectional markers spell-out in Egyptian Colloquial Arabic and the apparently exceptional behaviour of muta cum liquida clusters in Hungarian and in the Italian dialect of Finale Emilia. This approach also allows for a refinement of our understanding of the so-called yers, as well as for constraining the use of floating melody.
References
Anderson, John. 1987. The tradition of structural analogy. In Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday, 33–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.lt1.47andSearch in Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. 1982. The analysis of French schwa: Or, how to get something for nothing. Language 58. 534–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/413848.Search in Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip. 2011. An introduction to element theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748637447Search in Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip & Kuniya Nasukawa. 2019. Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Bafile, Laura. 2020. Vowel-zero alternations in government phonology and strict cv theory. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 57(2). 83–113.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.132.16bakSearch in Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark. 2005. Is grammar markovian? Lecture at the Korean Association of English.Search in Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2014. Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Laurel B. Preston & Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds.), Measuring grammatical complexity, 103–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia. 2008. The syntax of phonology: A radically substance-free approach. University of Tromsø PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Bohas, Georges & Jean Lowenstamm. 2021. The taṣrīf in the medieval Arabic grammatical tradition. In Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198796800.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages, Volume 13 of studies in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506Search in Google Scholar
Bromberger, Sylvain & Morris Halle. 1989. Why phonology is different. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1). 51–70.10.1515/9783110871258.150Search in Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2015. Cartography and optional feature realization in the nominal expression. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 10, 151–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2018. Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in italo-romance. In Roberta D’Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds.), Advances in Italian dialectology, vol. 5, 135–161. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004354395_008Search in Google Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2017. Deriving sonority from the structure, not the other way round: A strict cv approach to consonant clusters. The Linguistic Review 34(4). 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0012.Search in Google Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2019. Representation vs derivation: The case for a modular view of phonology. Radical.Search in Google Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo. 2015. Modeling phonologization: Vowel reduction and epenthesis in Lunigiana dialects. LOT Dissertation series PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo & Marc van Oostendorp. 2017. On silent markedness. In Bridget Samuels (ed.), Beyond markedness in formal phonology, 101–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.241.05vanSearch in Google Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo & Marc van Oostendorp. 2019. Empty morphemes in Dutch dialect atlases: Reducing morphosyntactic variation by refining emptiness typology. Glossa 4(1). 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.689.Search in Google Scholar
Charette, Monik. 1991. Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554339Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2003. Licensing strength and syllable structure in government phonology. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 38. 41–73.Search in Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2010. Complexity scales and licensing in phonology, 105. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110221503Search in Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2017. Phonological licensing and linguistic variation. In Przemysław Łozowski & Adam Głaz (eds.), Route 66: From deep structures to surface meanings. A Festschrift for Henryk Kardela on his 66th birthday, 113–133. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.Search in Google Scholar
de Castro-Arrazola, Varun, Edoardo Cavirani, Kathrin Linke & Francsec Torres-Tamarit. 2015. A typological study of vowel interactions in Basque. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian languages 1(2). 147–177. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.19.Search in Google Scholar
Fathi, Radwa. 2013. Vowel length in Egyptian Arabic: A different view. Paris: Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Faust, Noam. 2019. Defective representations explain a seemingly allomorphic pattern in palestinian Arabic. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics 5(1). 67–85.Search in Google Scholar
Faust, Noam, Nicola Lampitelli & Shanti Ulfsbjorninn. 2018. Articles of Italian unite! Italian definite articles without allomorphy. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63(3). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2018.8.Search in Google Scholar
Faust, Noam & Francsec Torres-Tamarit. 2017. Stress and final /n/ deletion in Catalan: Combining strict cv and ot. Glossa 2(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.64.Search in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 2000. The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fudge, Eric. 1987. Branching structure within syllable. Journal of Linguistics 23(2). 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700011312.Search in Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew. 2001. Turbid output representations and the unity of opacity. In Masako Hirotani, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall & Ji-ying Kim (eds.), NELS 30, 231–246. Amherst: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund & Jonathan Kaye. 1993. Polish notes from a Dubrivnik Café. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 3. 427–462.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1990. Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7(2). 255–300.10.1017/S0952675700001202Search in Google Scholar
Harris, John & Edmund Gussmann. 2002. Word-final onsets. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 1–42.Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann, Jutta, Veronika Hegedus & Henk van Riemsdijk. 2008. Introduction. In Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 1–22. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der & Nancy Ritter. 2000. No sympathy for opacity. Chicago Linguistics Society 35(1). 153–173.Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7(1). 193–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001184.Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological representations. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700000476.Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 193–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001184.Search in Google Scholar
Lampitelli, Nicola. 2010. Nounness, gender, class and syntactic structures in Italian nouns. In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), Romance Languages and linguistic theory 2008. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen 2008, 195–214. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.2.11lamSearch in Google Scholar
Lampitelli, Nicola. 2017. A morphophonological analysis of the velar insert in Italian verbs. Glossa 2(1). 47. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.234.Search in Google Scholar
Larsen, Bergeton. 1998. Vowel length, raddoppiamento sintattico and the selection of the definite article in Italian. In Patrick Sauzet (ed.), Langues et Grammaire II–III, Phonologie, vol. 8, 87–102. Paris: Université Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15(2). 235–289.10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3_10Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. Cv as the only syllable type. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, vol. 2, 419–441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.Search in Google Scholar
Passino, Diana. 2009. An element-based analysis of Italian nominal inflection. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, 63–75. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar
Polgárdi, Krisztina. 1999. Constraint ranking, government licensing and the fate of final empty nuclei. In John Rennison & Klaus Kühnhammer (eds.), Phonologica 1996, 167–182. The Hagues: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Thyphanie & Sandrine Ferré. 2020. French typical and atypical L1 acquisition: Compensatory strategies in sC clusters. In Elena Babatsouli (ed.), On under-reported Monolingual child phonology, Chapter 7. Bristol: Multilingualism Matters.Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint Interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rowicka, Grażyna. 1999. On ghost vowels: A strict CV approach. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1986. Abstract vowels in three dimensional phonology: The yers. The Linguistic Review 5. 247–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1986.5.3.247.Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A lateral theory of phonology, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110908336Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2011. Slavic yers. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 5, Chapter 122, 1–27. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0122Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2012. Direct Interface and one-chanel translation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511113Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias & Eugeniusz Cyran. 2018. Syllable structure in government phonology. The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, 262–292. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315675428-10Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias & Philippe Ségéral. 2020. Elastic s+c and left-moving yod in the evolution from Latin to French. Probus 32(2). 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0003.Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias & Markéta Žiková. 2010. The coda mirror v2. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(4). 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1556/aling.57.2010.4.4.Search in Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1986. A non-linear analysis of vowel-zero alternations in polish. Journal of Linguistics 22. 249–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700010793.Search in Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francesc. 2015. Length and voicing in Friulian and milanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(4). 1351–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9271-7.Search in Google Scholar
Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti. 2017. Markedness and formalising phonological representations. In Bridget Samuels (ed.), Beyond markedness in formal phonology, 153–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.241.07ulfSearch in Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc. 2008. Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua 118(9). 1362–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.009.Search in Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc. 2015. Parameters in phonological analysis: Stress. In Antonio Fabregas, Jaime Mateu & Michael, T. (eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters, (Contemporary studies in linguistics), 234–258. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Zikova, Markéta. 2008. Alternace e-nula v současné češtine. Autosegmentální laterální analyza. Masarykova univerzita v Brne PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Cross-morphemic palatalisation in Getxo Basque: empty positions, bipositionality and place licensing
- Silent lateral actors: the role of unpronounced nuclei in morpho-phonological analyses
- On the properties of null subjects in sign languages: the case of French Sign Language (LSF)
- On the why of NP-Deletion
- Pre-field phobia – About formal and meaning-related prohibitions on starting a German V2 clause
- Embedded-complement and discontinuous pseudogapping in Hybrid Type-Logical Grammar: a rejoinder to Kim and Runner (2022)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Cross-morphemic palatalisation in Getxo Basque: empty positions, bipositionality and place licensing
- Silent lateral actors: the role of unpronounced nuclei in morpho-phonological analyses
- On the properties of null subjects in sign languages: the case of French Sign Language (LSF)
- On the why of NP-Deletion
- Pre-field phobia – About formal and meaning-related prohibitions on starting a German V2 clause
- Embedded-complement and discontinuous pseudogapping in Hybrid Type-Logical Grammar: a rejoinder to Kim and Runner (2022)