Home Linguistics & Semiotics Prominence conditioned transformation in metrical analysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Prominence conditioned transformation in metrical analysis

  • John Frampton EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 21, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Crowhurst and Michael (2005) develops an OT analysis of the complex word stress system of Nanti, an Amazonian language of the Kampa group. They claim that the difficulty of developing a transformational analysis of the system clearly demonstrates the superiority of OT. One goal of this paper is to show that their claim is false and the complexities of the system are well within the scope of transformational phonology; a straightforward analysis is possible. The second goal is to show how prominence can naturally be included in rule systems.


Corresponding author: John Frampton, Boston, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

I have benefited greatly from discussion with Megan Crowhurst and Lev Michael and thank them for it. Lev Michael deserves special thanks for doing the hard work; collecting the Nanti data. Sam Gutmann provided insightful and useful criticism, as did two TLR reviewers and TLR editor.

References

Abrahamson, Arne. 1968. Contrastive distribution of phoneme classes in Içuã Tupi. Anthropological Linguistics 10(6). 11–22.Search in Google Scholar

Crowhurst, Megan J. & Lev Michael. 2005. Iterative footing and prominence-driven stress in Nanti (Kampa). Language 81(1). 47–95. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0013.Search in Google Scholar

Dell, François & Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 1985. Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7. 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.1985.7.2.105.Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel. 1988. On metrical constituent structure in Pirahã. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 207–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00134230.Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Dan & Keren Everett. 1984. On the relevance of syllable onsets and stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 705–711.Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, John. 2011. GDE syllabification – a generalization of Dell and Elmedlaoui’s syllabification algorithm. The Linguistic Review 28. 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.007.Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, John. 2018. Rule locality in the computation of word prosody. http://mathserver.neu.edu/ling/CWP.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Michael Kenstowicz. 1991. The free element condition and cyclic versus noncyclic stress. Linguistic Inquiry 22(3). 457–501.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael. 1990. Metrical theory and learnability. Ms., Dept. of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tuscon.10.1515/9783110870374-005Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Idsardi, William James. 1992. The computation of prosody. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 2006. The insufficiency of paper-and-pencil linguistics: The case of Finnish prosody. In Miriam Butt, Mary Dalrymple, & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Intelligent linguistic architectures: Variations on themes by Ronald M. Kaplan, 287–300. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan. 1990. Quantative consequences of rhythmic organization. In Manuela Noske & Karen Deaton (eds.), Parasession on the syllable in phonetics, 355–398. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-01-21
Published in Print: 2021-02-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2020-2054/pdf
Scroll to top button