Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
That-clauses in attitude predicates: Giving syntax its due
-
Robert J. Matthews
Published/Copyright:
November 30, 2020
Published Online: 2020-11-30
Published in Print: 2020-10-27
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Truthmaker semantics for natural language: Attitude verbs, modals, and intensional transitive verbs
- Comments
- Syntactic, semantic and methodological aspects of an expanded ontology in the modal and attitudinal domain
- Propositions and attitudinal objects
- A Plea for equality: Remarks on Moltmann’s semantics for clausal embedding
- On the performance of modal objects
- Content individuals, truthmaking conditions, and the formal semantics of attitude reports
- That-clauses in attitude predicates: Giving syntax its due
- Attitudinal and modal objects: A view from the syntax-semantics interface
- Content, modals and attitude predicates
- Modal objects or modal quantifiers?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Truthmaker semantics for natural language: Attitude verbs, modals, and intensional transitive verbs
- Comments
- Syntactic, semantic and methodological aspects of an expanded ontology in the modal and attitudinal domain
- Propositions and attitudinal objects
- A Plea for equality: Remarks on Moltmann’s semantics for clausal embedding
- On the performance of modal objects
- Content individuals, truthmaking conditions, and the formal semantics of attitude reports
- That-clauses in attitude predicates: Giving syntax its due
- Attitudinal and modal objects: A view from the syntax-semantics interface
- Content, modals and attitude predicates
- Modal objects or modal quantifiers?
