Performance study of bypass dual throat nozzle based on numerical simulation
-
Xiaodong Liu
Abstract
This study investigates the aerodynamic performance of elliptical cross-section bypass double-throat nozzles (BDTNs) with varying short-to-long axis ratios (b/a = 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4), using an axisymmetric BDTN as a reference. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were conducted to analyze flow field structures and performance in both non-vectored and vectored states under fixed inlet conditions (300 K, throat area ratio 1:1.44). The research integrates shaped cross-section design into BDTNs, aiming to improve thrust efficiency and infrared stealth capability. Results show that in the non-vectored state, thrust coefficients peak at NPR = 6, with elliptical BDTNs outperforming axisymmetric ones as b/a decreases. In the vectored state, however, thrust coefficient and vector angle generally decline with smaller b/a. Notably, placing the bypass channel along the short axis markedly enhances vectoring performance: for b/a ≥ 0.6, vector angles exceed 8° and may reach above 20°, while thrust coefficients remain comparable to axisymmetric designs. Oblique secondary flow injection exhibits similar but weaker trends than axial injection. Overall, the b/a = 0.6 configuration offers the best balance between thrust enhancement and flow efficiency. These findings provide new insights into geometric optimization of BDTNs and offer practical guidance for the design of efficient, stealth-capable aero-vector nozzles.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Xiao, Z, Jiang, X, Bin, MOU, Chen, Z. A review of research on fluid thrust vectoring technology[J]. Exp Meas Fluid Mech 2017;31:8–15.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Deere, KA, Berrier, BL, Flamm, JD. Computational study of fluidic thrust vectoring using separation control in a nozzle[C]. AIAA 2003-3803, 2003.10.2514/6.2003-3803Suche in Google Scholar
3. Deere, KA, Flamm, JD, Berrier, BL. Computational study of an axisymmetric dual throat fluidic thrust vectoring nozzle for a supersonic aircraft application[R]. AIAA 2007-5085, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-5085Suche in Google Scholar
4. Flamm, JD, Deere, KA, Mason, ML. Experimental study of an axisymmetric dual throat fluidic thrust vectoring for a supersonic aircraft application[R]. Aiaa 2007-5084, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-5084Suche in Google Scholar
5. Tan, H, Chen, Z. Numerical simulation study of a binary dual-throat jet thrust vectoring nozzle[J]. J Aero Dynamics 2007:678–1684.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Zhou, H. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of a vector-enhanced dual-throat jet vector nozzle. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Zhou, H, Tan, H, Sun, S, Cheng, D. Numerical simulation of a vector-enhanced dual-throat jet thrust-vectoring nozzle[J]. J Aero Dynamics 2010;25:2070–6.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Zhou, H, Tan, H, Zhou, H, Cai, J. Flow characterization of an enhanced dual-throat jet thrust vectoring nozzle. J Aero Dynamics 2013;28:1576–81.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Wang, M, Yang, P. Study on the internal flow characteristics of a dual-throat thrust-vectoring nozzle. J Propuls Technol 2008:566–72.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Taimu, QING, Liao, H, Zhu, C. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of axisymmetric dual-throat fluid control vector nozzle[J]. Gas Turbine Test Research 2009;22:14–18.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Eriqitai, DS, Jiajun, L. Flow characteristics and starting method of an expanding double throat nozzle[J]. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2011;37:320–4.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Wang, J, Eriqitai. Study on the effect of secondary flow injected into the expanding section on the startup of expanding dual-throat nozzle[J]. Prog Astronaut Eng 2011;2:318–22+329.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Mu, H, Yang, Q, Deng, X, Jin, D. Aerodynamic numerical study of unmanned aerial vehicle with dual throat nozzle and flying wing layout. Aeronaut Comput Technol 2014;44:90–3.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Xuefeng, XIA, Gao, F, Huang, G, Yang, W. Research progress of dual-throat thrust vectoring nozzle. Prog Astronaut Eng 2017;8:249–55+298.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Xuefeng, XIA, Feng, GAO, Huang, G. Numerical study on aerodynamic vector characteristics of bypassed dual-throat nozzle[J]. Adv Aeronaut Eng 2017;8:423–30.Suche in Google Scholar
16. R Kedia, D K, and S Madhu. Computational Analysis on De Laval Dual Throat Micronozzle [R]. AIAA 2021-2031, 2021.10.2514/6.2021-2031Suche in Google Scholar
17. S Madhu, D K, and R Kedia. Computational analysis on multiple secondary injection ports on dual throat nozzle configuration [R]. AIAA 2021-3577, 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Y Maruyama, M Sakata, and Y Takahashi. Performance analyses of fluidic thrust vector control system using dual throat nozzle[R]. AIAA 2019-4344, 2021.10.2514/6.2019-4344Suche in Google Scholar
19. Lin, Y, Jinglei, XU, Han, J, Huang, S, Wang, Y. Flight experiment of aerodynamic thrust vectoring rudderless flying wing[J]. J Aviat Dynam 2019;34:701–7.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Jiang, J, Jinglei, XU, Huang, S, Wang, Y, Pan, R. Numerical study of bypass dual-throat aerodynamic vector nozzle with parallelogram cross section[J]. J Aero Dynamics 2020;35:805–14.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Pan, R. Performance study of a new aerodynamic vectoring nozzle compatible with the new generation of aircraft hind body. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Jeffrey, DF, Karen, AD, Mary, LM, et al.. Design enhancement of the two-dimensional, dual throat fluidic thrust vectoring nozzle concept [R]. AIAA 2006-3707, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
