Home Aero-engine direct thrust control based on nonlinear model predictive control with composite predictive model
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aero-engine direct thrust control based on nonlinear model predictive control with composite predictive model

  • Haoyang Chen , Liangliang Li , Qiangang Zheng EMAIL logo and Haibo Zhang
Published/Copyright: June 27, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A novel NMPC (Nonlinear Model Predictive Control) based on composite predictive model is proposed and applied to direct engine thrust control. To improve the real-time of NMPC, an adaptive composite model based on SVM (State Variable Model), KF (Kalman Filter), and CLM (Component Level Model) is proposed as predictive model. The correction theory is adopted to establish a full envelope adaptive on-board predictive dynamic model and reduce the data storage of predictive model. At each sampling time, the CLM is calculated only once in the proposed NMPC, instead of many times in the popular NMPC based on EKF (extended Kalman filler). Therefore, the proposed NMPC has better real-time performance than the popular one. The simulations that consist of the proposed NMPC, the popular NMPC based on EKF, and the traditional controller PID are conducted. The simulations demonstrate that the proposed NMPC not only has greatly better real time performance than popular NMPC, but also has faster response speed than traditional controller PID.


Corresponding author: Qiangang Zheng, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China; and Aero-engine Thermal Environment and Structure Key Laboratory of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Aero Engine Corporation of China industry-university-research cooperation project

Award Identifier / Grant number: HFZL2023CXY013

Funding source: Fund of Prospective Layout of Scientific Research for NUAA

Award Identifier / Grant number: ILA220341A22

Award Identifier / Grant number: ILA220371A22

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This study was supported part by the Aero Engine Corporation of China industry-university-research cooperation project, China (No. HFZL2023CXY013), part by the Fund of Prospective Layout of Scientific Research for NUAA (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics), China (Nos. ILA220341A22, ILA220371A22).

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Xue, X, Huo, Q, Hong, L. Fretting wear-fatigue life prediction for aero-engine’s involute spline couplings based on abaqus. J Aero Eng 2019;32:04019081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001058.Search in Google Scholar

2. Garg, S. Aircraft turbine engine control research at NASA Glenn research center. J Aero Eng 2013;26:422–38. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000296.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zheng, Q, Zhang, H. A global optimization control for turbo-fan engine acceleration schedule design. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 2018;232:308–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016683412.Search in Google Scholar

4. Zheng, Q, Miao, L, Zhang, H, Ye, Z. On-board real-time optimization control for turbofan engine thrust under flight emergency condition. Proc IME J Syst Control Eng 2017;231:554–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959651817710127.Search in Google Scholar

5. Qi, Y, Bao, W, Chang, J. State-based switching control strategy with application to aeroengine safety protection. J Aero Eng 2015;28:04014076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000405.Search in Google Scholar

6. Zheng, Q, Zhang, H, Miao, L, Sun, F. On-board real-time optimization control for turbo-fan engine life extending. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2017;34:321–32.10.1515/tjj-2015-0066Search in Google Scholar

7. Litt, JS, Simon, DL, Garg, S, Guo, TH, Mercer, C, Millar, R, et al.. A survey of intelligent control and health management technologies for aircraft propulsion systems. JACIC 2004;1:543–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13048.Search in Google Scholar

8. Guo, J, Peng, Q, Zhou, J. Disturbance observer–based nonlinear model predictive control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. J Aero Eng 2019;32:04018121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000948.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lietzau, K, Kreiner, A. Model based control concepts for jet engines. In: Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New Orleans: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2001.10.1115/2001-GT-0016Search in Google Scholar

10. Csank, JT, Connolly, JW. Enhanced engine performance during emergency operation using a model-based engine control architecture. Ohio, USA Glenn Research Center 2016. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-3991.Search in Google Scholar

11. Garg, S. Introduction to advanced engine control concepts. Oklahoma: NASA Glenn Research Center From; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

12. Nathan, G. Intelligent engine systems adaptive control. NASA-CR-2008-215240; 2008. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20080025995.Search in Google Scholar

13. Qin, SJ, Badgwell, TA. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng Pract 2003;11:733–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0661(02)00186-7.Search in Google Scholar

14. Chen, Q, Sheng, H, Zhang, T. A novel direct performance adaptive control of aero-engine using subspace-based improved model predictive control. Aero Sci Technol 2022;128:107760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107760.Search in Google Scholar

15. Bing, YU, Zhouyang, LI, Hongwei, KE, Zhang, T. Wide-range model predictive control for aero-engine transient state. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35:246–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2021.10.015.Search in Google Scholar

16. Di Cairano, S, Yanakiev, D, Bemporad, A, Kolmanovsky, IV, Hrovat, D. Model predictive idle speed control: design, analysis, and experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2012;20:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2011.2112361.Search in Google Scholar

17. Essen, HV. Modelling and model based control of turbomachinery. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteitndhoven; 1998.Search in Google Scholar

18. Van Essen, HA, de Lange, HC. Nonlinear model predictive control experiments on a laboratory gas turbine installation. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2001;123:347–52. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1359478.Search in Google Scholar

19. Decastro, JA. Rate- based model predictive control of turbofan engine clearance. J Propul Power 2007;23:804–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25846.Search in Google Scholar

20. Richter, H, Singaraju, AV, Litt, J. Multiplexed predictive control of a large commercial turbofan engine. J Guid Control Dynam 2008;31:273–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30591.Search in Google Scholar

21. Richter, H. Advanced control of turbofan engines. New York: Springer; 2012.10.1007/978-1-4614-1171-0Search in Google Scholar

22. Saluru, D, Yedavalli, R. Fault tolerant model predictive control of a turbofan engine using C-MAPSS40k. ASME 2012, Dynamic systems and control conference joint with the JSME 2012, motion and vibration conference; 2006:349–58 pp.Search in Google Scholar

23. Wang, Y, Zheng, Q, Zhang, H, Xu, Z. Research on integrated control method of tiltrotor with variable rotor speed based on two-speed gearbox. Int J Turbo Jet Eng 2018;38:173–83.10.1515/tjj-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar

24. Zheng, Q, Xu, Z, Zhang, H, Zhu, Z. A turboshaft engine NMPC scheme for helicopter autorotation recovery maneuver. Aero Sci Technol 2018;76:421–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.034.Search in Google Scholar

25. Brunell, BJ, Bitmead, RR, Connolly, AJ. Nonlinear model predictive control of an aircraft gas turbine engine. Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on Decision and Control 2002;4:4649–51.10.1109/CDC.2002.1185111Search in Google Scholar

26. Di Cairano, S, Doering, J, Kolmanovsky, IV, Hrovat, D. Model predictive control of engine speed during vehicle deceleration. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2014;22:2205–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2014.2309671.Search in Google Scholar

27. Liu, X, Zhu, J, Luo, C, Xiong, L, Pan, Q. Aero-engine health degradation estimation based on an underdetermined extended Kalman filter and convergence proof. ISA Trans 2022;125:528–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.06.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Saluru, DC, Yedavalli, RK, Belapurkar, RK. Active fault tolerant model predictive control of a turbofan engine using C-MAPSS40k. ASME 2012 5th annual dynamic systems and control conference joint with the JSME 2012 11th motion and vibration conference. Ohio State University; 2012.10.1115/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8730Search in Google Scholar

29. Volponi, AJ. Gas turbine parameter corrections transactions. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1999;121:613–21. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2818516.Search in Google Scholar

30. Maine, T, Gilyard, G, Lambert, H. A preliminary evaluation of an F100 engine parameter estimation process using flight data. Orlando, USA: NASA Ames Research Center; 1990.10.2514/6.1990-1921Search in Google Scholar

31. Deuerlein, JW, Piller, O, Elhay, S, Simpson, AR. Content-based active-set method for the pressure-dependent model of water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plann Manag 2019;145:04018082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001003.Search in Google Scholar

32. Xie, Y, Byrd, RH, Nocedal, J. Analysis of the BFGS method with errors. SIAM J Optim 2020;30:182–209. https://doi.org/10.1137/19m1240794.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-15
Accepted: 2024-06-01
Published Online: 2024-06-27
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Computational analysis of the scramjet mode of the RBCC inlet using micro vortex generators
  3. Predicting compressor mass flow rate using various machine learning approaches
  4. Performance analysis of a gas turbine engine with intercooling and regeneration process - Part 1
  5. Performance analysis of pulse detonation ramjet
  6. Investigation on flow characteristics and its effect on heat transfer enhancement in a wedge channel with combination of circular, oblong, teardrop, and pencil pin fins
  7. Effect of perforated wall in controlling the separation due to SWBLI at Mach no. 5 to 9
  8. Research on performance seeking control of turbofan engine in minimum hot spot temperature mode
  9. Experimental study on flow field and combustion characteristics of V-gutter and integrated flameholders
  10. Probabilistic analysis of blade flutter based on particle swarm optimization-deep extremum neural network
  11. Numerical and experimental study on the critical geometric variation based on sensitivity analysis on a compressor rotor
  12. Aero-engine direct thrust control based on nonlinear model predictive control with composite predictive model
  13. Simple model of turbine-based combined cycle propulsion system and smooth mode transition
  14. Effect of inlet diameter on the flow structure and performance for aluminum-based water-jet engine
  15. Multi-objective optimization of the aerodynamic performance of butterfly-shaped film cooling holes in rocket thrust chamber
  16. Application of KH-RT model in lifting flame of methanol jet atomization
  17. Study of vortex throttle characteristics with adjustable resistance by rotation of the vortex chamber inlet channel
  18. Enhancing transonic compressor rotor efficiency by flow analysis-driven blade section modification
  19. Performance analysis of a planar shaped strut injector based supersonic combustion chamber
  20. The study of cascading effect in the integration of intake with gas turbine engine bay in subsonic cruise vehicle
Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2024-0009/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoobFGNdOYA1osSOP3BY5koy0U-ZotWbvYG8cju_uE8AgNhZOIJq
Scroll to top button