Home Design and validation of a two-dimensional variable geometry inlet
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Design and validation of a two-dimensional variable geometry inlet

  • Huacheng Yuan EMAIL logo , Yunfei Wang ORCID logo , Jun Liu and Zhengxu Hua
Published/Copyright: August 9, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The design of a two-dimensional variable geometry inlet which applied to a tandem type turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) propulsion system was investigated in the present paper through three-dimensional simulations and wind tunnel tests. The operation Mach number range was between 0 and 3. A multi-ramp geometry scheme was adopted to achieve acceptable performance at different inflow Mach number. The first ramp angle was fixed whilst the angles of the second and the third ramps were variable at different inflow Mach numbers. The Mach numbers at throat region were maintained between 1.3 and 1.5 at different inflow Mach numbers according to this variable geometry scheme. A fixed geometry rectangular-to-circular shape diffuser was adopted to improve aerodynamic performance of the inlet. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out between Ma1.5 and Ma3.0. The results indicated that good aerodynamic performance can be achieved at different inflow speed. At the design point, total pressure recovery of the inlet was 0.66 at critical condition. Wind tunnel validation experiment tests were conducted at Ma2.0, showing the movement of terminal shock wave from downstream to upstream as the back pressure increased. The inlet operated at supercritical, critical and subsonic conditions at different back pressure.


Corresponding author: Huacheng Yuan, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, P. R. China; and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power Systems, Nanjing, P. R. China, E-mail:

Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: NO.11772155

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.11772155).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Cockrell, CE, Auslender, AH, Guy, RW, McClinton, CR, Welch, SS. Technology roadmap for dual-mode scramjet propulsion to support space-access vision vehicle development. AIAA; 2002: 2002–5188 pp.10.2514/6.2002-5188Search in Google Scholar

2. Colville, JR, Starkey, RP, Lewis, MJ. Extending the flight Mach number of the SR-71 inlet. AIAA; 2005: 2005–3284 pp.10.2514/6.2005-3284Search in Google Scholar

3. David, WW, Lawrence, DH, Carl, AT, Karen, FC, Earl, HA. Propulsion airframe integration test techniques for hypersonic air-breathing configurations at NASA langley research center. AIAA; 2003: 2003–4406 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. Zhang, HJ, Guo, RW, Li, B. Research status of TBCC inlet and its key technologies. Acta Aerodyn Sin 2010;28:613–21.Search in Google Scholar

5. Russell, D, Corin, S. Combined rocket and airbreathing propulsion systems for space-launch applications. J Propul Power 1998;14:605–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5317.Search in Google Scholar

6. Colville, JR, Lewis, MJ. An aerodynamic redesign of the SR-71 inlet with applications to turbine based combined cycle engines. AIAA; 2004: 2004–3481 pp.10.2514/6.2004-3481Search in Google Scholar

7. Paul, AB, Nancy, BM, Douglas, GS. High speed turbines: development of a turbine accelerator (RTA) for space access. AIAA; 2003: 2003–6943 pp.Search in Google Scholar

8. Miyagi, H, Kimura, H, Kishi, K, Cabe, JL, Powell, TH, Yanagi, R. Combined cycle engine research in Japanese HYPR program. AIAA; 1998: 1998–3278 pp.10.2514/6.1998-3278Search in Google Scholar

9. Snyder, LE, Escher, DW, De Francesco, RL, Gutierrez, JL, Buckwalter, DL. Turbine based combination cycle (TBCC) propulsion subsystem integration. AIAA; 2004: 2004–3649 pp.10.2514/6.2004-3649Search in Google Scholar

10. Albertson, CW, Saied, E, Trexler, CA. Mach 4 test results of a dual-flow path, turbine based combined cycle inlet. AIAA; 2006: 2006–8138 pp.10.2514/6.2006-8138Search in Google Scholar

11. Colville, JR, Starkey, RP, Lewis, MJ. Axisymmetric inlet design for combined-cycle engines. J Propul Power 2006;22:1049–58. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.18063.Search in Google Scholar

12. Taguch, I, Yanagi, R. A study on pre-cooled turbojet-scramjet-rocket combined engines. AIAA; 1998: 98–35528 pp.10.2514/6.1998-3777Search in Google Scholar

13. Taguchi, H, Maita, M, Yatsuyanagi, N, Yamanakas, T. Airbreather/Rocket combined propulsion system research for Japanese SSTO space plane. AIAA; 1999: 99–45406 pp.10.2514/6.1999-4811Search in Google Scholar

14. Taguchi, H, Futamura, H, Shimodaira, K, Morimoto, T, Kojima, T, Okai, K. Design study on hypersonic engine components for TBCC space planes. AIAA; 2003: 2003–7006 pp.10.2514/6.2003-7006Search in Google Scholar

15. Okai, K, Taguchi, H, Kojima, T, Enomoto, S, Futamura, H. Numerical analysis of variable intake and nozzle for hypersonic engines. AIAA; 2003: 2003–7069 pp.10.2514/6.2003-7069Search in Google Scholar

16. Oswatisch, K. Pressure recovery in missiles with reaction propulsion at high supersonic speeds (the efficiency of shock diffusers). NACA TM1140; 1947.Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee, CC, Boedicker, C. Subsonic diffuser design and performance for advanced fighter aircraft. AIAA; 1985: 1985–3073 pp.10.2514/6.1985-3073Search in Google Scholar

18. Liu, J, Yuan, HC, Ge, N. The flow field and performance analyses of turbine-based combined cycle inlet mode transition at critical/subcritical conditions. Aero Sci Technol 2017;69:485–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.07.020.Search in Google Scholar

19. Liu, J, Yuan, HC, Hua, ZX, Chen, WF, Ge, N. Experimental and numerical investigation of smooth turbine-based combined cycle inlet mode transition. Aero Sci Technol 2017;60:124–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

20. Liu, J, Yuan, HC, Wang, YF, Ge, N. Unsteady supercritical/critical dual flow path inlet and its control method. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30:1877–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.10.007.Search in Google Scholar

21. FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide, FLUENT Inc., 2006.Search in Google Scholar

22. Teng, J, Yuan, HC. Variable geometry cowl sidewall for improving rectangular hypersonic inlet performanc. Aero Sci Technol 2015;4:128–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-06-21
Accepted: 2021-07-21
Published Online: 2021-08-09
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2021-0024/pdf
Scroll to top button