Home Technology Comparative study of numerical approaches to adaptive gas turbine cycle analysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparative study of numerical approaches to adaptive gas turbine cycle analysis

  • Michael Palman , Boris Leizeronok and Beni Cukurel EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 9, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Significant increase in task complexity for modern gas-turbine propulsion systems drives the need for future advanced cycles’ development. Further performance improvement can be achieved by increasing the number of engine controls. However, there is a lack of cycle analysis tools, suitable for the increased complexity of such engines. Towards bridging this gap, this work focuses on the computation time optimization of various mathematical approaches that could be implemented in future cycle-solving algorithms. At first, engine model is described as a set of engine variables and error functions, and is solved as an optimization problem. Then, the framework is updated to use advanced root-finding paradigms. Starting with Newton-Raphson, the model is improved by applying Broyden’s and Miller’s schemes and implementing solution existence validation. Finally, algorithms are compared in representative condition using increasingly complex turbojet and adaptive cycle turbofan configurations. As evaluation cases become more time consuming, associated time benefits also improve.


Corresponding author: Beni Cukurel, Turbomachinery and Heat Transfer Laboratory, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003 Haifa, Israel, E-mail:

Funding source: U.S. Office of Naval Research Global

Award Identifier / Grant number: N62909-17-1-217

Funding source: Minerva Research Center, Max Planck Society

Award Identifier / Grant number: AZ5746940764

Funding source: Peter Munk Research Institute

Award Identifier / Grant number: 110101

Funding source: Bernard M. Gordon Center for Systems Engineering

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1017930

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The present research effort was partially supported by the U.S. Office of Naval Research Global under award number N62909-17-1-217; Peter Munk Research Institute under award number 110101; and the Bernard M. Gordon Center for Systems Engineering under award number 1017930. Also, supported by Minerva Research Center (Max Planck Society Contract No. AZ5746940764).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. WILLIAM, K. Pratt and Whitney receives $437M for continued adaptive engine development. Available from: https://www.sae.org/news/2018/09/pratt--whitney-receives-usd437m-for-continued-adaptive-engine-development.Search in Google Scholar

2. Rolls-Royce. Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. Selected by U.S. Air Force to complete ADVENT research demonstrator Program. Available from: http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/109107/rolls_royce-selected-for-advent-demonstrator.html.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kowalski, M. Adaptive jet engines. J KONES Powertrain Transport 2011;18.Search in Google Scholar

4. Patel, HR, Wilson, DR. Parametric cycle analysis of adaptive. AIAA Propul Energy 2018. 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference, July 9-11, 2018, Cincinnati, Ohio, US. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4521.Search in Google Scholar

5. Visser, MOWPJ, Kogenhop, O. A generic approach for gas turbine adaptive modeling. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2006;128:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1995770.Search in Google Scholar

6. Palman, M, Leizeronok, B, Cukurel, B. Mission analysis and operational optimization of adaptive cycle microturbofan engine in surveillance and firefighting scenarios. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2019;141. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040734.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kadosh, K Cukurel, B. Micro-turbojet to turbofan conversion via continuously variable transmission: thermodynamic performance study. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2017;139. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034262.Search in Google Scholar

8. Lichtsinder, M, Levy, Y. Jet engine model for control and real-time simulations. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2006;128:745–53. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1915391.Search in Google Scholar

9. Powell, MJD. The theory of radial basis function approximation in 1990. In: Light, WA, editor. Advances in numerical analysis, volume 2, wavelets, subdivision algorithms, and radial basis functions. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992:105–210 pp.10.1093/oso/9780198534396.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

10. Regis, RG, Shoemaker, CA. A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. Inf J Comput 2007;19:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1060.0182.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wang, Y, Shoemaker, CA. A general stochastic algorithm framework for minimizing expensive black box objective functions based on surrogate models and sensitivity analysis. 2014. arXiv:1410.6271v1. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.6271.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gutmann, H-M. A radial basis function method for global optimization. J Global Optim 2001;19:201–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011255519438.10.1023/A:1011255519438Search in Google Scholar

13. Kennedy, J, Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995:1942–5.10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968Search in Google Scholar

14. Mezura-Montes, E, Coello, CA. Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: past, present and future. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 2011;1:173–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

15. Pedersen, ME. Good parameters for particle swarm optimization. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Hvass Laboratories; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ryaben’kii, VS, v Tsynkov, S. A theoretical introduction to numerical analysis. Boca Raton, Florida, US: CRC Press; 2006:243 p. ISBN 9781584886075.Search in Google Scholar

17. Broyden, CG. A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations math. Math Comput 1965;19:577–93. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0198670-6.Search in Google Scholar

18. Muller, DE. A method for solving algebraic equations using an automatic computer. MTAC; 1956. p. 208–15. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-1956-0083822-0.Search in Google Scholar

19. Walsh, PP, Fletcher, P. Gas turbine performance. Hoboken, New Jersey, US: Blackwell Publishing; 2004.10.1002/9780470774533Search in Google Scholar

20. Gouy, I. The computer language benchmarks game. Available from: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame.Search in Google Scholar

21. Aruoba, SB, Fernansez-Villaverde, J. A comparison of programming languages in macroeconomics. J Econ Dyn Control 2015;58:265–73.10.1016/j.jedc.2015.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-06-06
Accepted: 2021-06-28
Published Online: 2021-07-09
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2021-0021/html
Scroll to top button