Home Technology Study of Correctly Expanded Sonic Jet with Air Tabs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Study of Correctly Expanded Sonic Jet with Air Tabs

  • Arun Prasad R , Thanigaiarasu S EMAIL logo , Sembaruthi M and Rathakrishnan E
Published/Copyright: April 24, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present numerical study is to understand the effect of air tabs located at the exit of a convergent nozzle on the spreading and mixing characteristics of correctly expanded sonic primary jet. Air tabs used in this study are two secondary jets issuing from constant diameter tubes located diametrically opposite at the periphery of the primary nozzle exit, normal to the primary jet. Two air tabs of Mach numbers 1.0 to 1.4, in steps of 0.1 are considered in this study. The mixing modification caused by air tabs are analysed by considering the mixing of uncontrolled (free) primary jet as a reference. Substantial enhancement in jet mixing is achieved with Mach 1.4 air tabs, which results in 80 % potential core length reduction. The total pressure profiles taken on the plane (YZ) normal to the primary jet axis, at various locations along the primary jet centreline revealed the modification of the jet cross sectional shape by air tabs. The stream-wise vortices and bifurcation of the primary jet caused by air tabs are found to be the mechanism behind the enhanced jet mixing.

Nomenclature

D

Nozzle exit diameter

d

Air tab diameter

pt

Total pressure

p0

Total pressure at nozzle and air tab inlet

Mc

Mach number of Air tab

NPR

Nozzle Pressure Ratio

X

Axis along the primary jet centreline

Y

Axis normal to the air tab

Z

Axis along the air tab

SST

Shear Stress Transport Turbulence Model

k

Turbulence kinetic energy

ε

Rate of dissipation of turbulence energy

ω

Specific rate of dissipation of turbulence energy

References

1. Knowles K, Saddington AJ. A review of jet mixing enhancement for aircraft propulsion applications. J Aero Engg. 2006;220:103–27. DOI:10.1243/2F09544100G01605.Search in Google Scholar

2. Thanigaiarasu S, Karthick R, Arun Prasad R, Syed Musthafa H, Elangovan S, Rathakrishnan E. Study of underexpanded sonic jets by numerical simulation. Int J Turbo Jet-Engines. 2013;30:101–9. DOI:10.1515/tjj-2012-0023.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gopalakrishnan RN, Disimile PJ. Effect of turbulence model in numerical simulation of single round jet at low Reynolds number. Int J Comput Eng Res (IJCER). 2017;07:29–44.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pope SB. An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/Plane-jet anomaly. AIAA J. 1978;16:279–81. DOI:10.2514/3.7521.Search in Google Scholar

5. Thanigaiarasu S, Jayaprakash S, Elangovan S, Rathakrishnan E. Influence of tab geometry and its orientation on under-expanded sonic jets. Proc Inst Mech Eng PartG: J Aero Eng. 2007;222:331–9. DOI:10.1243/2F09544100JAERO299.Search in Google Scholar

6. Davis MR. Variable control of jet decay. AIAA J. 1982;20:606–9. DOI:10.2514/3.7934.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lardeau S, Lamballais E, Bonnet JP. Direct numerical simulation of a jet controlled by fluid injection. J Turbulence. 2002;3:1–25. DOI:10.1088/1468-5248/3/1/002.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chauvet N, Deck S, Jacquin L. Shock patterns in a slightly underexpanded sonic jet controlled by radial injections. Phy Fluids. 2007;19:048104. DOI:10.1063/1.2720836.Search in Google Scholar

9. Samimy M, Kim JH, Kaster J, Adamovich I, UtkIin Y. Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators. J Fluid Mech. 2007;578:305–30. DOI:10.1017/S0022112007004867.Search in Google Scholar

10. Behrouzi P, Feng T, McGuirk JJ. Active flow control of jet mixing using steady and pulsed fluid tabs. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Sys Ctrl Eng. 2008;222:381–92. DOI:10.1243/09596518JSCE543.Search in Google Scholar

11. Yu SC, Lim KS, Chao W, Goh XP. Mixing enhancement in subsonic jet flow using the air-tab technique. AIAA J. 2008;46:2966–9. DOI:10.2514/1.37187.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wan C, Yu SC. Investigation of air tabs effect in supersonic jets. J Propul Power. 2011;27:1157–60. DOI:10.2514/1.B34079.Search in Google Scholar

13. Wan C, Yu SCM. Numerical investigation of the air tabs technique in jet flow. J Propul Power. 2013;29:42–9. DOI:10.2514/1.B34534.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rui GU, Jinglei XU. Numerical simulation of enhancing the exhaust mixing by the air-tab technique. Proc ASME Turbo Expo 2014 Turbine Tech Conf Expo. 2014;1–6. DOI:10.1115/GT2014-25448.Search in Google Scholar

15. Arun Kumar P, Verma SB, Rathakrishnan E. Experimental study of subsonic and sonic jets controlled by air tabs. J Propul Power. 2015;45:384–92. DOI:10.2514/1.B35675.Search in Google Scholar

16. Yang H, Zhou Y, So RM, Liu Y. Turbulent jet manipulation using two unsteady azimuthally separated radial minijets. Proc R Soc A. 2016;472:1–19. DOI:10.1098/rspa.2016.0417.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Arun Kumar P, Zhou Y. Parametric study and scaling of jet manipulation using an unsteady minijet. J Fluid Mech. 2018;848:592–630. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2018.376.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-21
Accepted: 2020-03-31
Published Online: 2020-04-24
Published in Print: 2022-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2020-0005/pdf
Scroll to top button