References

1. Horlock JH, Denton JD. A review of some early design practice using computational fluid dynamics and a current perspective. J Turbomach. 2005;127:5–13.10.1115/1.1650379Search in Google Scholar

2. Jameson A. Aerodyn Des Via Control Theory. J Sci Comput. 1988;3:233–60.10.1007/BF01061285Search in Google Scholar

3. Jin D, Gui X. Design optimization of compressor blades by hybrid genetic algorithm. Acta Aeronaut Et Astronaut Sin. 2006;27:29–32.Search in Google Scholar

4. Luo J, Xiong J, Liu F, McBean I. Three-dimensional aerodynamic design optimization of a turbine blade by using an adjoint method. J Turbomach. 2011;133:011026.10.1115/GT2009-60115Search in Google Scholar

5. Luo J, Zhou C, Liu F. Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method. J Turbomach. 2014;136:051005.10.1115/1.4025164Search in Google Scholar

6. Walther B, Nadarajah S. Optimum shape design for multirow turbomachinery configurations using a discrete adjoint approach and an efficient radial basis function deformation scheme for complex multiblock grids. J Turbomach. 2015;137:081006–20.10.1115/1.4029550Search in Google Scholar

7. Wang DX, He L. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multi-stage turbomachines—part I: methodology and verification. J Turbomach. 2010;132:021011.10.1115/GT2008-50208Search in Google Scholar

8. Qian R, Qiao Z, Song W, Chen Y. On better optimization for practical design of airfoil. J Northwest Polytech Univ. 2003;21:523–27.Search in Google Scholar

9. Huang Y, Chen Z. An investigation for the complex variable method in shape optimization of transonic airfoils. Acta Aerodyn Sin. 2005;23:501–05.Search in Google Scholar

10. Martins JR, Kroo IM, Alonso JJ. An automated method for sensitivity analysis using complex variables. 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2000 Jan 10 – 13;Reno, NV. AIAA.10.2514/6.2000-689Search in Google Scholar

11. Martins JR, Sturdza P, Alonso JJ. The connection between the complex-step derivative approximation and algorithmic differentiation. 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2001 Jan 08 – 11;Reno, NV. AIAA.10.2514/6.2001-921Search in Google Scholar

12. Keskin A, Dutta AK, Bestle D. Modern compressor aerodynamic blading process using multi-objective optimization. ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2006 May 08 – 11;Barcelona, Spain. ASME.10.1115/GT2006-90206Search in Google Scholar

13. Oyama A, Liou MS Transonic axial-flow blade optimization: evolutionary algorithms/three-dimensional navier-stokes solver. J Propul Power. 2004;20:612–19.10.2514/6.2002-5642Search in Google Scholar

14. Okui H, Verstraete T, Van Den Braembussche R A, Alsalihi Z. Three-dimensional design and optimization of a transonic rotor in axial flow compressors. J Turbomach. 2013;135:031009.10.1115/GT2011-45425Search in Google Scholar

15. Qin N, Camie G, Wang Y, Shahpar S. Design optimization of casing grooves using zipper layer meshing. J Turbomach. 2013;136:031002–12.10.1115/1.4024650Search in Google Scholar

16. Hassan R, Cohanim B, De Weck O. A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2005 Apr 18–21; Austin, Texas. AIAA.10.2514/6.2005-1897Search in Google Scholar

17. Hicks RM, Henne PA. Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircr. 1978;15:407–12.10.2514/6.1977-1247Search in Google Scholar

18. Xiao Z. Research on numerical simulation of rotor wing flow field. Mianyang: China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

19. Spalart P, Allmaras SA. A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1992 Jan 06– 09;Reno, NV. AIAA.10.2514/6.1992-439Search in Google Scholar

20. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J Comput Phys. 1981;43:357–72.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5Search in Google Scholar

21. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conversation difference scheme v: a second-order sequal to godunov’s method. J Comput Phys. 1979;32:101–36.10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1Search in Google Scholar

22. Reid L, Moore RD Design and overall performance of four highly loaded high speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure-ratio core compressor. Cleveland, Ohio: Lewis Research Center, 1978. Report No.: NASA TP 1337.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC. Particle swarm optimization. 1995 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995 Nov 27–Dec 01; Perth, WA. IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

24. Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence, 1998 May 04– 09;Perth, WA. IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

25. Shi Y, Eberhart RC. Parameter selection in particle swarm optimization. International Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1998;Berlin Heidelberg. Springer. IEEE.10.1007/BFb0040810Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhang L, Yu H, Hu S. A new approach to improve particle swarm optimization. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2003;Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer.10.1007/3-540-45105-6_12Search in Google Scholar

27. Venter G, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Particle swarm optimization. AIAA Stud J. 2003;41:1583–89.10.2514/6.2002-1235Search in Google Scholar

28. Zhang L. The theorem and practice upon the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

29. Wang DX, He L, Li YS, Wells RG. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines—part II: validation and application. J Turbomach. 2010;132:021012.10.1115/1.3103928Search in Google Scholar