Home Defining the Ecological Coefficient of Performance for an Aircraft Propulsion System
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Defining the Ecological Coefficient of Performance for an Aircraft Propulsion System

  • Yasin Şöhret EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 4, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The aircraft industry, along with other industries, is considered responsible these days regarding environmental issues. Therefore, the performance evaluation of aircraft propulsion systems should be conducted with respect to environmental and ecological considerations. The current paper aims to present the ecological coefficient of performance calculation methodology for aircraft propulsion systems. The ecological coefficient performance is a widely-preferred performance indicator of numerous energy conversion systems. On the basis of thermodynamic laws, the methodology used to determine the ecological coefficient of performance for an aircraft propulsion system is parametrically explained and illustrated in this paper for the first time. For a better understanding, to begin with, the exergy analysis of a turbojet engine is described in detail. Following this, the outputs of the analysis are employed to define the ecological coefficient of performance for a turbojet engine. At the end of the study, the ecological coefficient of performance is evaluated parametrically and discussed depending on selected engine design parameters and performance measures. The author asserts the ecological coefficient of performance to be a beneficial indicator for researchers interested in aircraft propulsion system design and related topics.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the reviewers for their positive and constructive comments and contribution to the improvement of the quality of the paper.

Nomenclature

AC

Compressor section of the turbojet

CC

Combustion chamber section of the turbojet

GT

Gas turbine section of the turbojet

cp

Specific heat capacity under constant pressure (kJ.kg−1.s−1)

e

Specific energy (kJ.kg−1)

f

Air to fuel ratio

ECO

Ecological performance function

ECOP

Ecological coefficient of performance

Ex

Exergy (kJ)

ex

Specific exergy (kJ.kg−1)

h

Specific enthalpy (kJ.kg−1)

IN

Inlet section of the turbojet engine

LHV

Lower heating value (kJ kg−1)

m

Mass flow (kg)

FT

Thrust

Q

Heat flux (kJ)

SFC

Specific fuel consumption (g.kN−1.s−1)

s

Specific entropy

T

Temperature (K)

t

Time (s)

V

Velocity (m.s−1)

W

Work (kJ)

Greek letters
η

Efficiency

ε

Exergy efficiency

References

1. Yechout T, Morris S, Bossert D, Hallgren W. Introduction to aircraft flight dynamics. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2003.10.2514/4.862069Search in Google Scholar

2. Phillips WF. Dynamics of flight. New York: Wiley, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

3. IPCC. Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

4. Lee JJ. Can we accelerate the improvement of energy efficiency in aircraft systems? Energy Convers Manage. 2010;51(1):189–96.10.1016/j.enconman.2009.09.011Search in Google Scholar

5. Babikian R, Lukachko SP, Waitz IA. The historical fuel efficiency characteristics of regional aircraft from technological, operational, and cost perspectives. J Air Transport Manag. 2002;8(6):389–400.10.1016/S0969-6997(02)00020-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Riggins DW, Taylor T, Moorhouse DJ. Methodology for performance analysis of aerospace vehicles using the laws of thermodynamics. J Aircr. 2006;43(4):953–63.10.2514/1.16426Search in Google Scholar

7. Bejan A, Siems DL. The need for exergy analysis and thermodynamic optimization in aircraft development. Exergy Int J. 2001;1(1):14–24.10.1016/S1164-0235(01)00005-XSearch in Google Scholar

8. Arntz A, Atinault O, Merlen A. Exergy-based formulation for aircraft aeropropulsive performance assessment: theoretical development. Aiaa J. 2014;53(6):1627–39.10.2514/1.J053467Search in Google Scholar

9. Şöhret Y, Ekici S, Altuntaş Ö, Hepbasli A, Karakoç TH. Exergy as a useful tool for the performance assessment of aircraft gas turbine engines: a key review. Prog Aerospace Sci. 2016;83:57–69.10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.03.001Search in Google Scholar

10. Hayes D, Lone M, Whidborne JF, Camberos J, Coetzee E. Adopting exergy analysis for use in aerospace. Prog Aerospace Sci. in press. DOI:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

11. Riggins DW. The thermodynamic continuum of jet engine performance: the principle of lost work due to irreversibility in aerospace systems. Int J Thermodyn. 2003;6:107–20.Search in Google Scholar

12. Turgut ET, Karakoc TH, Hepbasli A. Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbofan engine. Int J Energy Res. 2007;31:1383–97.10.1002/er.1310Search in Google Scholar

13. Balli O, Hepbasli A. Energetic and exergetic analyses of T56 turboprop engine. Energy Convers Manage. 2013;73:106–20.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.04.014Search in Google Scholar

14. Najjar YS, Balawneh IA. Optimization of gas turbines for sustainable turbojet propulsion. Propul Power Res. 2015;4(2):114–21.10.1016/j.jppr.2015.05.004Search in Google Scholar

15. Struchtrup H, Elfring GJ. External losses in high-bypass turbo fan air engines. Int J Exergy. 2008;5:400–12.10.1504/IJEX.2008.019112Search in Google Scholar

16. Turgut ET, Karakoc TH, Hepbasli A, Rosen MA. Exergy analysis of a turbofan aircraft engine. Int J Exergy. 2009;6:181–99.10.1504/IJEX.2009.023997Search in Google Scholar

17. Tona C, Raviolo PA, Pellegrini LF, De Oliveira Jr S. Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a turbofan engine during a typical commercial flight. Energy. 2010;35:952–59.10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.052Search in Google Scholar

18. Aydin H, Turan O, Karakoc TH, Midilli A. Component-based exergetic measures of an experimental turboprop/turboshaft engine for propeller aircrafts and helicopters. Int J Exergy. 2012;11:322–48.10.1504/IJEX.2012.050228Search in Google Scholar

19. Ehyaei MA, Anjiridezfuli A, Rosen MA. Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbojet engine with an afterburner. Thermal Sci. 2013;17:1181–94.10.2298/TSCI110911043ESearch in Google Scholar

20. Grönstedt T, Irannezhad M, Lei X, Thulin O, Lundbladh A. First and second law analysis of future aircraft engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2013;136(3):031202.10.1115/1.4025727Search in Google Scholar

21. Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoc TH. Energetic and exergetic performance assessment of a turboprop engine at various loads. Int J Exergy. 2013;13:543–64.10.1504/IJEX.2013.058107Search in Google Scholar

22. Balli O. Afterburning effect on the energetic and exergetic performance of an experimental turbojet engine (TJE). Int J Exergy. 2014;14:212–43.10.1504/IJEX.2014.060278Search in Google Scholar

23. Tai VC, See PC, Mares C. Optimisation of energy and exergy of turbofan engines using genetic algorithms. Int J Sustainable Aviation. 2014;1(1):25–42.10.1504/IJSA.2014.062866Search in Google Scholar

24. Baklacioglu T, Turan O, Aydin H. Dynamic modeling of exergy efficiency of turboprop engine components using hybrid genetic algorithm-artificial neural networks. Energy. 2015;86:709–21.10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.025Search in Google Scholar

25. Sohret Y, Dinc A, Karakoc TH. Exergy analysis of a turbofan engine for an unmanned aerial vehicle during a surveillance mission. Energy. 2015;93:716–29.10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.081Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhao X, Thulin O, Grönstedt T. First and second law analysis of intercooled turbofan engine. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2015;138(2):021202.10.1115/1.4031316Search in Google Scholar

27. Yucer CT. Thermodynamic analysis of the part load performance for a small scale gas turbine jet engine by using exergy analysis method. Energy. 2016;111:251–59.10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.108Search in Google Scholar

28. Ekici S, Altuntas O, Acikkalp E, Sogut MZ, Karakoc TH. Assessment of thermodynamic performance and exergetic-sustainability of turboprop engine using mixture of kerosene and methanol. Int J Exergy. 2016;19(3):295–314.10.1504/IJEX.2016.075666Search in Google Scholar

29. Çoban K, Çolpan CO, Karakoç TH. Energy and exergy analysis of an helicopter engine. J Sustainable Aviation Res. 2016;1(1):27–39.Search in Google Scholar

30. Sohret Y, Sogut MZ, Karakoc TH, Turan O. Customised application of exergy analysis method to PW120A turboprop engine for performance evaluation. Int J Exergy. 2016;20(1):48–65.10.1504/IJEX.2016.076678Search in Google Scholar

31. Balli O. Exergy modeling for evaluating sustainability level of a high by-pass turbofan engine used on commercial aircrafts. Appl Thermal Eng. 2017;123:138–55.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.068Search in Google Scholar

32. Gonca G, Sahin B. Thermo-ecological performance analyses and optimizations of irreversible gas cycle engines. Appl Thermal Eng. 2016;105:566–76.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.046Search in Google Scholar

33. Long R, Liu W. Ecological optimization and coefficient of performance bounds of general refrigerators. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl. 2016;443:14–21.10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.052Search in Google Scholar

34. Frikha S, Abid MS. Performance optimization of irreversible combined Carnot refrigerator based on ecological criterion. Int J Refrigeration. 2016;62:153–65.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.10.013Search in Google Scholar

35. Açıkkalp E. Performance analysis of irreversible solid oxide fuel cell-Brayton heat engine with ecological based thermo-environmental criterion. Energy Convers Manage. 2017;148:279–86.10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.003Search in Google Scholar

36. Açıkkalp E. Ecologic and sustainable objective thermodynamic evaluation of molten carbonate fuel cell–supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle hybrid system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(9):6272–80.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.110Search in Google Scholar

37. Açıkkalp E. Analysis of a Brownian heat engine with ecological criteria. Eur Phys J Plus. 2016;131(12):426.10.1140/epjp/i2016-16426-6Search in Google Scholar

38. Sforza PM. Theory of aerospace propulsion. New York, NY: Elsevier, 2012.10.1016/B978-1-85617-912-6.00014-1Search in Google Scholar

39. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1996.Search in Google Scholar

40. Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

41. Kotas TJ. The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Greaat Britain: Anchor Brendon Ltd; 1985.Search in Google Scholar

42. Dinc A. Sizing of a turboprop unmanned air vehicle and its propulsion system. J Thermal Sci Technol. 2015;35(2):53–62.Search in Google Scholar

43. Turan O. Experimental set-up, testing and performance modeling of a turbojet engine for target drone applications. Omer Halisdemir Univ J Eng Sci. 2017;6(2):717–28.Search in Google Scholar

44. Ekici S, Şöhret Y, Karakoç TH. Performance evaluation parameters for turbojet engines. J Aviation. 2017;1(1):32–38.10.30518/jav.323866Search in Google Scholar

45. Ust Y. Ecological performance analysis and optimization of energy production systems. Master Dissertation, Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department., Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

46. Angulo-Brown F. An ecological optimization criterion for finite-time heat engines. J Appl Phys. 1991;69:7465–69.10.1063/1.347562Search in Google Scholar

47. Yan Z. Comment on an ecological optimization criterion for finite-time heat engines. J Appl Phys. 1993;73:3583.10.1063/1.354041Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-9-18
Accepted: 2017-10-2
Published Online: 2018-5-4
Published in Print: 2018-5-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2017-0042/html
Scroll to top button