Home Aerodynamic Optimization of Turbine Based Combined Cycle Nozzle
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aerodynamic Optimization of Turbine Based Combined Cycle Nozzle

  • Shangze Li , Yufei Zhang , Haixin Chen EMAIL logo and Kaiwen Deng
Published/Copyright: October 6, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper aims at optimizing a Turbine Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) nozzle for upgrading its aerodynamic performance in multiple flight conditions. An in-house RANS solver called NSAWET is employed for aerodynamic evaluation. The optimizer is a differential evolution algorithm combined with a response surface. Firstly, a two-dimensional model of the initial TBCC nozzle system is investigated. The flow field of the nozzle contains complicated shockwave interactions that cause thrust loss. Then multi-point aerodynamic optimization of a two-dimensional ramjet nozzle is carried out, which objectives are to maximize the thrust coefficients at Mach numbers 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0. The objective functions are increased substantially at the first two Mach numbers after optimization, while slightly decreased at the last Mach number. The turbine flow path is built up based on the optimized profile and the performances in typical flight conditions are validated. Results demonstrate that both the ramjet and turbine nozzles are improved in most flight conditions.

Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB744801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11372160 and 11572177) and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2013ZA58002).

Nomenclature

P0

total pressure computed by CFD

Ppitot

total pressure in front of the pitot tube

CT

thrust coefficient

Ma

Mach number

Cp

pressure coefficient, N

A

area, m2

Factual

axial thrust

θ

the angle between the × axis and the nozzle exit, deg

Fideal

ideal thrust, N

pamb

ambition pressure, Pa

m˙actual

mass flow, kg/s

Tt

total temperature at the entrance of the nozzle, K

NPR

nozzle pressure ratio

References

1. Marshall AW, Gupta AK. Critical issues in TBCC modeling, AIAA 2004-3827.10.2514/6.2004-3827Search in Google Scholar

2. Dusa DJ. Exhaust nozzle system design considerations for turboramjet performance of an over-under turboramjet nozzle, AIAA-95-4509.Search in Google Scholar

3. Walker S, Tang M, Mamplata C. TBCC Propulsion for a Mach 6 hypersonic airplane, AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

4. Daguang C. Brief introduction of hypersonic flight and TBCC concept. Aeroengine 2006;3:004.Search in Google Scholar

5. Fleeman EL. Missile design and systems engineering. Chapter 3, Propulsion Considerations. Transatlantic Publishers, edited by Joseph A. Schetz, 2012.10.2514/4.869082Search in Google Scholar

6. Mo JW, Xu JL, Li C, Zhang K. The design and numerical study of the over-under TBCC exhaust system, AIAA-2009-5300.10.2514/6.2009-5300Search in Google Scholar

7. Ruffin SM, Venkatapathy E, Keener ER. Hypersonic single expansion ramp nozzle simulations. J Spacecraft Rockets 1993;29(6):749–55.10.2514/3.25527Search in Google Scholar

8. Chen HX, Fu S, Li FW. Navier-Stokes simulations for transport aircraft wing/body high-lift configurations. J Aircraft 2003;40(5):883–90.10.2514/2.6878Search in Google Scholar

9. Zhang YF, Chen HX, Fu S. Improvement to patched grid technique with high-order conservative remapping method. J Aircraft 2011;48(3):884–93.10.2514/1.C031093Search in Google Scholar

10. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA 1994;32(8):1598–605.10.2514/3.12149Search in Google Scholar

11. Huang W, Wang ZG, Ingham DB, Ma L, Pourkashanian M. Design exploration for a single expansion ramp nozzle (SERN) using data mining. Acta Astronaut 2013;83:10–17.10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.09.016Search in Google Scholar

12. Monta WJ. Pitot survey of exhaust flow field of a 2-D scramjet nozzle at Mach 6 with air or Freon and argon used for exhaust simulation, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhang YF, Chen HX, Fu S, Zhang M, Zhang MH. Drag prediction method of powered-on civil aircraft based on thrust drag bookkeeping. Chinese J Aeronaut 2015;28(4):1023–33.10.1016/j.cja.2015.06.015Search in Google Scholar

14. Zhang YF, Chen HX, Zhang M, Zhang MH, Li Z, Fu S. Performance prediction of conical nozzle using Navier-Stokes computation. J Propul Power 2015;31(1):192–203.10.2514/1.B35164Search in Google Scholar

15. Deng KW, Chen HX. A hybrid aerodynamic optimization algorithm based on differential evolution and RBF response surface, AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2015.10.2514/6.2016-3671Search in Google Scholar

16. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 1997;11(4):341–59.10.1023/A:1008202821328Search in Google Scholar

17. Kulfan BM. A universal parametric geometry representation method “CST”, AIAA-2007-62, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-62Search in Google Scholar

18. Zhang YF, Fang XM, Chen HX, Fu S, Duan ZY, Zhang YJ. Supercritical natural laminar flow airfoil optimization for regional aircraft wing design. Aerospace Sci Technol 2015;43:152–64.10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.024Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-08-02
Accepted: 2016-09-01
Published Online: 2016-10-06
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2016-0052/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button