Home Technology Experimental Investigation of Shape Transition Effects on Isolator Performance
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental Investigation of Shape Transition Effects on Isolator Performance

  • G. Chandra Bose , S. Thanigaiarasu , S. Elangovan and E. Rathakrishnan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 26, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Isolator is a critical component in supersonic air breathing engine and it is usually situated between the inlet and the combustor of a dual-mode ramjet/scramjet engine. In the present study, shape transition effects on isolator performance have been studied by carrying out experimental investigations on square, square to circular and square to elliptical transition ducts. The length of the isolator chosen in this study is 180 mm and the cross-sectional area of 900 mm2 is maintained constant along the length for all the ducts. Experiments were carried out for isolator inlet Mach 2, using a contoured nozzle. Varying the pressure of the settling chamber varied the expansion level at the nozzle exit, which run the nozzle. The wall static pressure along the length of the isolator and the Pitot pressure at the exit plane of the isolator were measured for all the configurations. Shadowgraph technique was employed for visualizing the shock-train in the isolator. The square to circular transition isolator is found to be more efficient in achieving the static pressure rise across the isolator than the square and square to elliptical transition ducts.

PACS: 47.40.Ki

References

1. Green JE. Interactions between shock waves and turbulent boundary layers. Prog Aerosp Sci 1970;11:235–341.10.1016/0376-0421(70)90018-7Search in Google Scholar

2. Adamson TC, Messiter AF. Analysis of two – dimensional interactions between shock waves and boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1980;12:103–138.10.1146/annurev.fl.12.010180.000535Search in Google Scholar

3. Neumann EP, Lustwerk F. Supersonic diffuser for wind tunnels. J Appl Mech 1949;16:195–202.10.1115/1.4009935Search in Google Scholar

4. Neumann EP, Lustwerk F. High – efficiency supersonic diffusers. J Aeronaut Sci 1951;18:369–374.10.2514/8.1975Search in Google Scholar

5. Carroll BF, Dutton JC. Characteristics of multiple shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions in rectangular ducts. J Propul Power 1990;6:186–193.10.2514/3.23243Search in Google Scholar

6. Carroll BF, Dutton JC. Turbulence phenomena in a multiple normal shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. AIAA J 1992;30:43–48.10.2514/3.10880Search in Google Scholar

7. Davis DO, Gessner FB. Experimental and numerical investigation of supersonic turbulent flow through a square duct. AIAA Journal 1986;24:1508–1515.10.2514/3.9473Search in Google Scholar

8. Delery JM. Experimental investigation of turbulence properties in transonic shock/boundary layer interactions. AIAA J 1989;21:180–185.10.2514/3.8052Search in Google Scholar

9. Kooi JW. ‘Experiment on Transonic Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction’, (NATO) AGARD CP 168, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

10. Balu G, Gupta S, Srivastava N, Panneerselvam S, Rathakrishnan E. Experimental investigation of isolator for supersonic combustion. AIAA 2002, Paper 2002–4134.10.2514/6.2002-4134Search in Google Scholar

11. Kumar A, Balu G, Panneerselvam S, Rathakrishnan E. ‘Isolator for Dual Mode Exit Conditions’, ISTS, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

12. Sugiyama H, Fukada K, Mizobata K, Sun L, Minato R. ‘Experimental Investigation on Shock Wave and Turbulent Boundary Interactions in a Square Duct at Mach 2 and 4’, IGTC, Tokyo TS-023, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

13. Waltrup PJ, Billig FS. Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts. AIAA J 1973; 11:1404–1408.10.2514/3.50600Search in Google Scholar

14. Sullins G, McLafferty G. Experimental results of shock trains in rectangular ducts. AIAA 1992, Paper 92–5103.10.2514/6.1992-5103Search in Google Scholar

15. Lin P, Rao GVR, O‘Connor G. Numerical analysis of normal shock train in constant area isolator. AIAA 1991, Paper 91–2162.10.2514/6.1991-2162Search in Google Scholar

16. Sun LQ, Sugiyama H, Mizobata K, Fukada K. Numerical and experimental investigations on the Mach 2 pseudo-shock wave in a square duct. J Vis 2003;6:363–70.10.1007/BF03181743Search in Google Scholar

17. Ikui T, Matsuo K, Nagai M. The mechanisms of psuedo-shock waves. Bull JSME 1974;17:731–9.10.1299/jsme1958.17.731Search in Google Scholar

18. Ikui T, Matsuo K, Nagai M, Honjo M. Oscillation phenomena of psuedo-shock waves. Bull JSME 1974;17:1278–85.10.1299/jsme1958.17.1278Search in Google Scholar

19. Ikui T, Matsuo K, Mochizuki H, Somekawa K. Psuedo-shock waves in a divergent channel. Bull JSME 1980;23:20–25.10.1299/jsme1958.23.20Search in Google Scholar

20. Green JE. Reflexion of an oblique shock wave by a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 1970;40:81–95.10.1017/S0022112070000058Search in Google Scholar

21. Haung W, Wang Z-guo, Pourkashanian M, Ma L, Ingham DB, Luo S, et al. Numerical investigation on the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator. Acta Astronaut 2011;68:1669–75.10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.12.011Search in Google Scholar

22. Balu G, Panneerselvam S, Rathakrishnan E. Computational studies on the performance of an isolator for dual mode scramjet engine, 2005, ISABE 2005–1279.Search in Google Scholar

23. Grendell KM. A comparison study of rectangular and chamfered isolator cross-sectional shape with varied divergence. AIAA 2004, Paper 2004–129.10.2514/6.2004-129Search in Google Scholar

24. Johnson JA, Wu BJC. Pressure recovery in supersonic diffusers. ASME J Fluid Eng Trans ASME 1975;374–76.10.1115/1.3447318Search in Google Scholar

25. Wang CP, Tian XA, Cheng KM, Wu YZ. Numerical analysis of pseudo-shock flow diffusion phenomenon in variable cross-section ducts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers – IMECH Part G, J Aerosp Eng 2008; 222:1109–21.10.1243/09544100JAERO427Search in Google Scholar

26. Rathakrishnan E. Gas dynamics New Delhi: PHI Learning private limited, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-06-04
Accepted: 2015-06-07
Published Online: 2015-06-26
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0022/html
Scroll to top button