Home Technology A Study on the Installed Performance Seeking Control for Aero-Propulsion under Supersonic State
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Study on the Installed Performance Seeking Control for Aero-Propulsion under Supersonic State

  • Fengyong Sun EMAIL logo , Lizhen Miao and Haibo Zhang
Published/Copyright: August 4, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An integrated model including inlet, engine and nozzle with their internal and external characteristics was built to simulate the propulsion installed performance. With the integrated model, a new performance seeking control scheme under supersonic state is firstly proposed, taking inlet ramp angle as optimizing variable, which is equally important to fuel flow rate, nozzle throat area, guided vane angle of fan and compressor. Specially, engine installed thrust replaces its total thrust as one crucial factor for performance seeking control. Installed performances under supersonic state are significantly improved with the new scheme, as installed thrust increases of up to 4.9% in the maximum thrust mode, installed specific fuel consumption improvements of up to 3.8% in the minimum fuel consumption mode, and turbine temperature decreases of up to 0.6% in the minimum turbine temperature mode. The simulation results also indicates that, the performance seeking control scheme proposed shows superiority in restraining of the increasing of rotational speed and turbine temperature in performance seeking control.

Funding statement: Funding: Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (Grant/Award Number: ‘20142152022’) Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (Grant/Award Number: ‘KYLX15_0257’).

Nomenclature

A8

Nozzle Throat Area

A9

Nozzle Exit Area

A10

Nozzle Maximum Cross-sectional Area

Adbl

Inlet Boundary Layer Flow Tube Area

Ac

Inlet Capture Area

Cspill

Inlet Spill Drag Coefficient

Cdbl

Inlet Boundary Layer Drag Coefficient

Caft

Nozzle Aft-body Drag Coefficient

αf

Fan Vane Angle

αc

Compressor Vane Angle

F

Engine Total Thrust

Fin

Installed Engine Thrust

σ

Inlet Total Pressure Recovery Coefficient

φ

Inlet Flow Coefficient

δ

Inlet Ramp Angle

ρ

Air Density

εin

Error of Inlet and Engine Cooperation Working Equation

εen

Errors of Engine Component Cooperation Working Equations

Ma

Mach Number

H

Flight Height

T

Temperature

p

Pressure

Pnf

Fan Rotational Speed

Pnc

Compressor Rotational Speed

Smf

Fan Surge Margin

Smc

Compressor Surge Margin

Smi

Inlet Surge Margin

Wfb

Fuel Flow Rate

sfc

Specific Fuel consumption

sfcin

Installed Specific Fuel consumption

Fspill

Inlet Spill Drag

Fdbl

Inlet Boundary Layer Drag

Faft

Aft-body Drag

men

Engine Air Flow

Engine Station Number

0

Free Stream

1

Inlet of Supersonic Inlet

2

Inlet of Fan

46

Outlet of Fan Turbine

References

1. Litt JS, Simon DL, Garg S, Guo TH, Mercer C, Millar R, Behbahani A, Bajwa A, Jensen DT. A survey of intelligent control and health management technologies for aircraft propulsion systems. J Aerosp Comput Inf Commun 2004;1:543–63.10.2514/1.13048Search in Google Scholar

2. Wang W, Guo R. Numerical study of unsteady starting characteristics of a hypersonic inlet. Chin J Aeronaut 2013;26:563–71.10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.018Search in Google Scholar

3. Silva VVR, Khatib W, Fleming PJ. Performance optimization of gas turbine engine. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2005;18:575–83.10.1016/j.engappai.2005.01.001Search in Google Scholar

4. Lyantsev OD, Breikin TV, Kulikov GG, Arkov VY. On-line performance optimisation of aero engine control system. Automatica 2003;39:2115–21.10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00224-3Search in Google Scholar

5. Chang J, Zheng R, Yu D, Bao W, Chen F, Jiang W, Zhu S, Zheng R. Minimization of classification samples for supercritical and subcritical patterns of supersonic inlet. J Thermal Sci 2014;23:375–80.10.1007/s11630-014-0720-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Chisholm JD. In-flight optimization of the total propulsion system. AlAA Paper, 1992: 92–3744.10.2514/6.1992-3744Search in Google Scholar

7. Orme JS. Performance seeking control (PSC) for the F-15 highly integrated digital electronic control (HIDEC) aircraft. 1995.Search in Google Scholar

8. Pachidis VA, Pilidis P, Alexander T, Kalfas A, Templalexis I. Advanced performance simulation of a turbofan engine intake. J Propul Power 2006;22:201–5.10.2514/1.14244Search in Google Scholar

9. Turner MG, Reed JA, Ryder R, Veres JP. Multi-fidelity simulation of a turbofan engine with results zoomed into mini-maps for a zero-d cycle simulation. ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American society of mechanical engineers, 2004, 219–230.10.1115/GT2004-53956Search in Google Scholar

10. Rediniotis O, Bowersox R, Kirk A, Kumar A, Tichenor N. Active control of jet engine inlet flows. Texas engineering experiment station college station, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

11. Gruber CR. Development of the planar inlet design and analysis process (PINDAP). 2004.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wakelam CT, Hynes TP, Hodson HP, Evans SW, Chanez P. Separation control for aeroengine intakes, part 1: low-speed investigation of control strategies. J Propul Power 2012;28:758–65.10.2514/1.B34326Search in Google Scholar

13. Wakelam CT, Hynes TP, Hodson HP, Evans SW, Chanez P. Separation control for aero engine intakes, part 2: high-speed investigations. J Propul Power 2012;28:766–72.10.2514/1.B34327Search in Google Scholar

14. Nishizawa U, Kameda M. Computational simulation of shock oscillation around a supersonic air-inlet. AIAA 2006;3042:2006.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ball WH, Hickcox TE. Rapid evaluation of propulsion system effects, Volume I–Final Report. Report AFFDL-TR-78-91, 1978.10.21236/ADB031766Search in Google Scholar

16. Zhu Z. A simple feasible SQP algorithm for inequality constrained optimization. Appl Math Comput 2006;182:987–98.10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.073Search in Google Scholar

17. Waltz RA, Morales JL, Nocedal J, Orban D. An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps. Math Program 2006;107:391–408.10.1007/s10107-004-0560-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Nocedal J, Wright S. Numerical optimization, series in operations research and financial engineering. New York: Springer, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-13
Accepted: 2015-7-23
Published Online: 2015-8-4
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0036/html
Scroll to top button