Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons
-
Michel Morin
Abstract
In “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Garrett Hardin implicitly moved from bounded commons — a pasture or a tribe’s territory — to the case of boundless commons — the ocean, the atmosphere and planet Earth. He insisted on the need for imposing limits on the use of these resources, blurring the difference between communal property and open access regimes. The success of his paper is due in great measure to his neglect of economic, scientific, legal and anthropological literature. His main lifelong focus was on limiting population growth. He could have avoided the conceptual confusion he created by turning to well-known political economists such as John Locke and Adam Smith or, for that matter, jurists, such as Blackstone. Instead, he simply envisioned indigenous lands as an unbounded wilderness placed at the disposal of frontiersmen. Though he eventually acknowledged the existence of managed commons, he had little interest in community rules pertaining to resource exploitation. For him, these were simply moral norms which inevitably became ineffective after a community reached a certain level of population. He also took economists to task for failing to include in their analysis the true environmental and social costs of public decisions. Still, the famous example of the indigenous people of Northeastern Quebec illustrates a shortcoming of his analysis: community members did not act in total isolation from each other. On the contrary, communal norms could prevent an overexploitation of resources or allow for the adoption of corrective measures.
© 2018 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- The Banality of the Commons: Efficiency Arguments Against Common Ownership Before Hardin
- Before the Tragedy of the Commons: Early Modern Economic Considerations of the Public Use of Natural Resources
- Commons and Environmental Regulation in History: The Water Commons Beyond Property and Sovereignty
- Cold-War Commons: Tragedy, Critique, and the Future of the Illiberal Problem Space
- The “Commons” Discourse on Marine Fisheries Resources: Another Antecedent to Hardin’s “Tragedy”
- Savagery, Civilization, and Property: Theories of Societal Evolution and Commons Theory
- Historicizing Elinor Ostrom: Urban Politics, International Development and Expertise in the U.S. Context (1970-1990)
- Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons
- Commons and Cognition
- Confronting Hardin: Trends and Approaches to the Commons in Historiography
- Give Us Back Our Tragedy: Nonrivalry in Intellectual Property Law and Policy
- Re-romanticizing Commons and Community in Israeli Discourse: Social, Economic, and Political Motives
- Impeachment by Judicial Review: Israel’s Odd System of Checks and Balances
- Israel’s “Constitutional Revolution”: A Thought from Political Liberalism
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- The Banality of the Commons: Efficiency Arguments Against Common Ownership Before Hardin
- Before the Tragedy of the Commons: Early Modern Economic Considerations of the Public Use of Natural Resources
- Commons and Environmental Regulation in History: The Water Commons Beyond Property and Sovereignty
- Cold-War Commons: Tragedy, Critique, and the Future of the Illiberal Problem Space
- The “Commons” Discourse on Marine Fisheries Resources: Another Antecedent to Hardin’s “Tragedy”
- Savagery, Civilization, and Property: Theories of Societal Evolution and Commons Theory
- Historicizing Elinor Ostrom: Urban Politics, International Development and Expertise in the U.S. Context (1970-1990)
- Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons
- Commons and Cognition
- Confronting Hardin: Trends and Approaches to the Commons in Historiography
- Give Us Back Our Tragedy: Nonrivalry in Intellectual Property Law and Policy
- Re-romanticizing Commons and Community in Israeli Discourse: Social, Economic, and Political Motives
- Impeachment by Judicial Review: Israel’s Odd System of Checks and Balances
- Israel’s “Constitutional Revolution”: A Thought from Political Liberalism
