Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Local conjunction and comparative markedness
-
Ania Łubowicz
Published/Copyright:
February 21, 2008
Abstract
1. Introduction
In classic Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993), markedness constraints evaluate output well-formedness, whereas faithfulness constraints evaluate input-output disparity. Thus, markedness constraints have access only to the output while faithfulness constraints view both the input and the output.
Published Online: 2008-02-21
Published in Print: 2003-11-24
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Comparative markedness
- Some real and not-so real consequences of comparative markedness
- Comparative markedness and containment
- Comparative markedness and identity effects in reduplication
- Counterfeeding, derived environment effects, and comparative markedness
- Local conjunction and comparative markedness
- Comparative markedness and derived environments
- Looking through opacity
- What does comparative markedness explain, what should it explain, and how?
Articles in the same Issue
- Comparative markedness
- Some real and not-so real consequences of comparative markedness
- Comparative markedness and containment
- Comparative markedness and identity effects in reduplication
- Counterfeeding, derived environment effects, and comparative markedness
- Local conjunction and comparative markedness
- Comparative markedness and derived environments
- Looking through opacity
- What does comparative markedness explain, what should it explain, and how?
