Formulations in Chinese criminal courtroom interaction

References

Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes & Ivan Leudar. 2005. Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies 7(6). 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055420.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Paul Drew. 1979. Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139022767Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & Fabio Ferraz de Almeida. 2020. Order in court: Talk-in-interaction in judicial settings. In Malcolm Coulthard, Alison May & Rui Sousa-Silva (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics, 2nd edn., 177–191. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429030581-16Search in Google Scholar

Ferraz de Almeida, Fabio & Paul Drew. 2020. The fabric of law-in-action: ‘formulating’ the suspect’s account during police interviews in England. International Journal of Speech, Language and Law 27(1). 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.38527.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic marker. Pragmatics 6(2). 167–190.10.1075/prag.6.2.03fraSearch in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. In John C. McKinney & Edward A. Tiryakian (eds.), Theoretical sociology, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Search in Google Scholar

He, Xiaodan. 2018. A study on the epistemic status of conversational repair in courtroom trial discourse. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 41(4). 61–68.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1985. Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2002. The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1427–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00072-3.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68. 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & D. Rodney Watson. 1979. Formulations as conversational objects. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 123–162. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.115Search in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin. 2018. Adjusting epistemic gradients: The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics 3(1). 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120.Search in Google Scholar

Macleod, Nicola J. 2010. Police interviews with women reporting rape: A critical discourse analysis. Aston University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola Gilbert. 2018. Multimodal conduct in the law: Language, gesture and materiality in legal interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108236362Search in Google Scholar

Ran, Yongping. 2004. Pragmatic functions of the Chinese discourse marker ba and its contextual adaptability. Modern Foreign Languages 27(4). 340–349.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Gitte. 2016. Repeated use of request for confirmation in atypical interaction. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 30(10). 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1209244.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation analysis: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0062Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Search in Google Scholar

Schourup, Lawrance. 1999. Discourse markers. Lingua 107. 227–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(96)90026-1.Search in Google Scholar