Fictional characterization through repair, membership categorization, and attribute ascription

References

Bednarek, Monika. 2010. The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2011a. The stability of the televisual character: A corpus stylistic case study. In Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.13bedSearch in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2011b. Expressivity and televisual characterisation. Language and Literature 20(1). 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010386884.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2012. Constructing “nerdiness”: Characterisation in the Big Bang Theory. Multilingua 31(2). 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult-2012-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2015. “Wicked” women in contemporary pop culture: “Bad” language and gender in weeds, nurse jackie, and saving grace. Text and Talk 35(4). 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina. 2014. Negotiating understanding in “intercultural moments” in immigrant family interactions. Communication Monographs 81(2). 208–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.902983.Search in Google Scholar

Bubel, Claudia. 2011. Relationship impression formation: How viewers know people on the screen are friends. In Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.15bubSearch in Google Scholar

Bubel, Claudia & Alice Spitz. 2006. “One of the last vestiges of gender bias”: The characterization of women through the telling of dirty jokes in Ally McBeal. Humor 19(1). 71–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor.2006.004.Search in Google Scholar

Chepinchikj, Neda & Celia Thompson. 2016. Analysing cinematic discourse using conversation analysis. Discourse, Context and Media 14. 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & Carolina Fernandez-Quintanilla. 2017. Fictional characterization. In Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 93–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Curl, Traci & Paul Drew. 2008. Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41. 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Catherine. 2006. Gendered sense of humor as expressed through aesthetic typifications. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

DeLand, Michael. 2021. Men and their moments: Character-driven ethnography and interaction analysis in a park basketball rule dispute. Social Psychology Quarterly 84(2). 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725211004894.Search in Google Scholar

Desilla, Louisa. 2012. Implicatures in film: Construal and functions in Bridget Jones romantic comedies. Journal of Pragmatics 44(1). 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2011. “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1628–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.016.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2013. Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research 1(1). 22–60. https://doi.org/10.7592/ejhr2013.1.1.dynel.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2015. Impoliteness in the service of verisimilitude in film interaction. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions, 157–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.256.07dynSearch in Google Scholar

Egbert, Maria. 2004. Other-initiated repair and membership categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1467–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Richard & William Housley (eds.). 2015. Advances in membership categorization analysis. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873Search in Google Scholar

Hoey, Elliot. 2014. Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(2). 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.900229.Search in Google Scholar

Housley, William & Richard Fitzgerald. 2002. The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research 2(1). 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001639.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kozloff, Sarah. 2000. Overhearing film dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520924024Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Andreas Jucker (eds.). 2017. Pragmatics of fiction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110431094Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Andreas Jucker (eds.). 2021. The pragmatics of fiction: Literature, stage and screen discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474447959Search in Google Scholar

Mandala, Susan. 2007. Solidarity and the scoobies: An analysis of the -y suffix in the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Language and Literature 16(1). 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007072845.Search in Google Scholar

Mandala, Susan. 2011. Star Trek: Voyager’s seven of nine: A case study of language and character in a televisual text. In Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 205–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.14manSearch in Google Scholar

Nishizaka, Aug. 2021. Partitioning a population in agreement and disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 172. 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

Okazawa, Ryo. 2021. Resisting categorization in interaction: Membership categorization analysis of sitcom humor. Journal of Pragmatics 186. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.011.Search in Google Scholar

Okazawa, Ryo. 2022. Membership categorization, humor, and moral order in sitcom interactions. Discourse, Context & Media 46. 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100593.Search in Google Scholar

Okazawa, Ryo & Ken Kawamura. 2022. The visual and conversational order of membership categories in fictional films. Human Studies 45(3). 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09635-5.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, Roberta. 2007. Anatomising Gilbert Grissom: The structure and function of the televisual character. In Michael Allen (ed.), Reading CSI: Crime TV under the microscope, 39–56. London: I. B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755696208.ch-003Search in Google Scholar

Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.). 2011. Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211Search in Google Scholar

Quaglio, Paulo. 2009. Television dialogue: The sitcom friends versus natural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.36Search in Google Scholar

Queen, Robin. 2015. Vox popular: The surprising life of language in the media. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781394260232Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2013. Gender and sexuality in animated television sitcom interaction. Discourse and Communication 7(2). 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312472971.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2018. On the relevance and accountability of dialect: Conversation analysis and contact linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(2). 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12277.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2019. Category accounts: Identity and normativity in sequences of action. Language in Society 48(4). 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404519000368.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Kay. 2010. Television dramatic dialogue: A sociolinguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1972a. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1972b. On the analyzability of stories by children. In John Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 329–345. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5). 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23. 499–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007a. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007b. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2). 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041.Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2008. Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television “sitcoms”. Social Semiotics 18(3). 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330802217071.Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14(3). 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534.Search in Google Scholar

Svensson, Hanna. 2022. Name(ing) norms: Mispronunciations and ethnic categories in political talk. Language in Society 53. 99–128 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1017=S0047404522000379.10.1017/S0047404522000379Search in Google Scholar

Watson, Rod. 2015. De-reifying categories. In Richard Fitzgerald & William Housley (eds.), Advances in membership categorisation analysis, 23–50. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873.n2Search in Google Scholar

Whitehead, Kevin. 2020. The problem of context in the analysis of social action: The case of implicit whiteness in post-apartheid South Africa. Social Psychology Quarterly 83(3). 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519897595.Search in Google Scholar