Abstract
This paper analyses how representations of real life and fictional worlds are combined and differentiated in the talk produced in literary reading groups. We adopt a socio-cognitive approach to reading group interaction, which combines discourse analysis and Text World Theory to examine the social and cognitive processes enacted in examples of such talk. Text World Theory is a cognitive linguistic discourse analysis framework which examines the mental spaces (“worlds”) cued by language-in-use and the ontological relations between those worlds. This combined framework is applied to four extracts of reading group talk and facilitates the discussion of the structural, referential and representational aspects of the interaction. Our analysis considers the insights which reading group talk provides into the complex relationships between text and talk. We argue that ontological shifting in reading group talk performs various functions, such as claiming expertise, doing humour and play, and mitigating face-threatening disagreement. Talking about texts allows people these options for shifting between representations of real life and fictional worlds and this may go some way towards accounting for the popularity of such groups in contemporary culture.
Appendix 1 Transcription key
| Transcript feature | Key |
|---|---|
| (.) | brief pause – less than 0.5 s |
| (0.5) | timed pause |
| = | latching – no pause between speakers' turns |
| [yeah [yeah | simultaneous speech |
| EXACtly | speaker places emphasis on word or phrase |
| >yes< | speaker speeds-up |
| <no> | speaker slows down |
| ::: | drawn-out sound |
| Xxxxxx | inaudible speech |
| ((laughter)) | paralinguistic feature, nonverbal communication feature, or transcriber's note |
References
Allington, Daniel. 2011. ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature 20(4). 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011398558.Suche in Google Scholar
Allington, Daniel & Bethan Benwell. 2012. Reading the reading experience: An ethnomethodological approach to ‘booktalk’. In Anouk Lang (ed.), From codex to hypertext: Reading at the turn of the twenty-first century, 217–233. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan. 2009. ‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction. Language and Literature 18(3). 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105855.Suche in Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan. 2012. Commonsense anti-racism in book group talk: The role of reported speech. Discourse and Society 23(4). 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441106.Suche in Google Scholar
Boyd, William. 2013. Solo. London: Vintage.Suche in Google Scholar
Browse, Sam. 2018. Cognitive rhetoric: The cognitive poetics of political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.31Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Areas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Suche in Google Scholar
Crace, Jim. 2013. Harvest. London: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William A. 2009. Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvian Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSuche in Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine. 1997. Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236498.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Extence, Gavin. 2013. The universe versus Alex Woods. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Giles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582Suche in Google Scholar
Geerarts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.). 2010. Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226461Suche in Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629909Suche in Google Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J. 1993. Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Westview Press.10.12987/9780300159240Suche in Google Scholar
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216059Suche in Google Scholar
Hartley, Jenny. 2002. The reading groups book: 2002-2003 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199255962.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2002. Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. 1973a. The literary work of art: An investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic and theory of literature. (trans. G. Grobowicz). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. 1973b. The cognition of the literary work of art. (trans. R. A. Crowley and K. Olson). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kingsolver, Barbara. 2012. Flight behaviour. London: Harper Collins.Suche in Google Scholar
Littleton, Karen & Neil Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203809433Suche in Google Scholar
Long, Elizabeth. 2003. Book Clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Mahato, Swatilekha. 2015. Women and nature: Eco-feminist reading of Barbara Kingsolver’s Prodigal Summer and Flight Behaviour. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities 3(4). 631–639. https://ijellh.com/OJS/index.php/OJS/article/view/515.Suche in Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 2009. Stylistics and ‘reading-in-talk.’. Language and Literature 18(3). 338–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105857.Suche in Google Scholar
Peplow, David, Joan Swann, Paola Trimarco & Sara Whiteley. 2016. The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315850900Suche in Google Scholar
Peplow, David. 2011. ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature 20(4). 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011401964.Suche in Google Scholar
Peplow, David. 2016. Talk about books: A study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar
Phelan, James. 2005. Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190927431.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar
Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781412983792Suche in Google Scholar
Radway, Janice. 1991. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature, 2nd edn. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991a. Possible worlds and accessibility relations: A semantic typology of fiction. Poetics Today 12(3). 553–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772651.Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991b. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/431530Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1998. The text as world versus the text as game: Possible worlds semantics and postmodern theory. Journal of Literary Semantics 27(3). 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1998.27.3.137.Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2010. Possible-worlds theory. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge. https://search-proquest-com.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/docview/2137930457?accountid=13828 (accessed 30 March 2020).10.4324/9780203932896Suche in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.005Suche in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748631209Suche in Google Scholar
Swann, Joan & Daniel Allington. 2009. Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature 18(3). 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105852.Suche in Google Scholar
Te Molder, Hedwig & Jonathan Potter (eds.). 2005. Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489990Suche in Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies 8(1). 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565.Suche in Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2014. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitve approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107775404Suche in Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wagner-Martin, Linda. 2014. Barbara Kingsolver’s world: Nature, art and the twenty-first century. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Whiteley, Sara. 2011. Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to the remains of the day. Language and Literature 20(1). 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010377950.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Recontextualisation and advocacy in the translation zone
- Towards an integrated approach: A sociolinguistic analysis of Monica Ali’s Brick Lane
- On the participatory agency of texts: Using institutional forms in performance appraisal interviews
- Legal reasoning: a textual perspective on common law judicial opinions and Chinese judgments
- The ART of apologizing: Entering the black box of an intervention program
- Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction: A socio-cognitive approach to reading group talk
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Recontextualisation and advocacy in the translation zone
- Towards an integrated approach: A sociolinguistic analysis of Monica Ali’s Brick Lane
- On the participatory agency of texts: Using institutional forms in performance appraisal interviews
- Legal reasoning: a textual perspective on common law judicial opinions and Chinese judgments
- The ART of apologizing: Entering the black box of an intervention program
- Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction: A socio-cognitive approach to reading group talk