Japanese hypothetical enactment as a response to third-party complaint

References

Baynham, Mike. 1996. Direct speech: What’s it doing in non-narrative discourse? Journal of Pragmatics 25. 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00074-3.Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina. 2004. The quote and beyond: Defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1071–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.015.Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen. 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross- disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.15Search in Google Scholar

Buttny, Richard. 1997. Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research 23. 477–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00407.x.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Andrew C. 1990. A thesaurus of Japanese mimesis and onomatopoeia: Usage by categories. Tokyo: Taishukan.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66. 764–805. https://doi.org/10.2307/414729.Search in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 1999. Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28. 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404599004029.Search in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2006. Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5). 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x.Search in Google Scholar

Coppen, Peter-Arno & Ad Foolen. 2012. Dutch quotative van: Past and present. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.15.15copSearch in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk, 81–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486654.005Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In Anssi Peräkylä & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), Emotion in interaction, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

DeCapua, Andrea & Lisa Huber. 1995. ‘If I were you…’: Advice in American English. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 14(2). 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1995.14.2.117.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & Elizabeth Holt. 1988. Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 35. 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1988.35.4.03a00060.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Pawl & Traci Walker. 2009. Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(12). 2400–2414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046.Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty Lou. 1989. Pseudoquotation in current English communication: ‘Hey, she didn’t really say it. Language in Society 18. 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500013646.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. & Jessica Robles. 2010. It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies 12(6). 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610381862.Search in Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 2006. Quoted thought and speech using the mitai-na ‘be like’ noun-modifying construction. In Satoko Suzuki (ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese, 53–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.151.05fujSearch in Google Scholar

Golato, Andrea. 2000. An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied actions: Und ichi so/undo er so “and I’m like/and he’s like”. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00030-2.Search in Google Scholar

Golato, Andrea. 2012. Impersonal quotatives and hypothetical discourse. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.15.04golSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486654.003Search in Google Scholar

Günthner, Susanne. 1997. The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds.), The language of emotions: Conceptualization, expression and theoretical foundation, 247–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.85.19gunSearch in Google Scholar

Haakana, Markku. 2007. Reported thought in complaint stories. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk, 150–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486654.007Search in Google Scholar

Haberland, Hartmut. 1986. Reported speech in Danish. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 219–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871968.219Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto. 1997. An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese spoken discourse. In Ho-min Sohn & John Haig (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 6, 565–581. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar

Heinemann, Trine & Véronique Traverso. 2008. Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 2381–2384.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Sue Sefi. 1992. Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 359–419. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in a conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(2). 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33. 425–454. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3304_04.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2007. ‘I’m eyeing your chop up mind’: Reporting and enacting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486654.004Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Liz. 2012. Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4). 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.726886.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Koester, Almut & Michael Handford. 2018. ‘It’s not good saying “Well it it might do that or it might not”’: Hypothetical reported speech in business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 130. 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Koike, Chisato. 2009. Syntactic nesting in Japanese: An analysis of linking utterances in conversations. The International Journal of the Humanities 7(8). 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/cgp/v07i08/42727.Search in Google Scholar

Kreuz, Roger J. 2020. Irony and sarcasm. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/12503.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1989. Remembering and presenting prose: Quoted speech as a data source. Discourse Processes 12. 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538909544721.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles. 1986. Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 29–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871968.29Search in Google Scholar

Makino, Seiichi & Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Tokyo: Japan Times.Search in Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Jenny. 1991/1992. Conversational non-cooperation: An exploration of disattended complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction 25. 97–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819109389359.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 2018. The form and meaning of the dangling mitaina construction in a network of constructions. In Mutsuko Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto & Junko Mori (eds.), Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture, 74–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.285.03matSearch in Google Scholar

Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14. 325–363. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Senko K. 2005. Another conversation: Expressivity of mitaina and inserted speech in Japanese discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37(6). 837–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Elaterina. 2014. “You are children but you can always say …”: Hypothetical direct reported speech and child-parent relationship in a Heritage Language classroom. Text & Talk 34(5). 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0019.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, Greg. 1999. Functions of reported speech in group discussions. Applied Linguistics 20(3). 376–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.376.Search in Google Scholar

Nakada, Tomoko. 1992. Kaiwa no hoosaku toshite no kurikaeshi [On repetition within conversational strategy]. Kokuritsu kokugo kenkyuujo hookoku 13(104). 267–302. Tokyo: Kokuritsu kokugo kenkyuujo.Search in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shigeko. 1995. Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra Thompson (eds.), In essays in semantics and pragmatics: In honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/pbns.32.12okaSearch in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shigeko & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2008. Quotative tte in Japanese. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 205–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.80.10okaSearch in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimating claims. Human Studies 9. 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00148128.Search in Google Scholar

Sams, Jessie. 2010. Quoting the unspoken: An analysis of quotations in spoken discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 3147–3160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.024.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26. 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.715.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2005. On complainability. Social Problems 52(4). 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1996. Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society 25. 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500020601.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1991. Metaphor. In Steven Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A reader, 519–539. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margaret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 483–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margaret. 2010. Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics 20(2). 229–277. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel.Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margaret. 2012. Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Chloe & Alexa Hepburn. 2013. Managing the moral implications of advice in informal interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(4). 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.839095.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2.Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123.Search in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2002. Grammars, words, and embodied meanings: On the evolution and uses of ‘so’ and ‘like. Journal of Communication 52. 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02563.x.Search in Google Scholar

Suga, Ayumi. 2012. Jitsuen to warai niyoru katari rensa [Enactment and laughter in storytelling sequence]. In Akiko Yoshimura, Ayumi Suga & Naoko Yamamoto (eds.), Kotoba o mitsumete –Uchida Seeji kyooju taikan kinen ronbunshuu [Observing linguistic phenomena: A festschrift for Professor Seiji Uchida on the occasion of his retirement from Nara Women’s University], 425–436. Tokyo: Eihoosha.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Satoko. 1995. A study of the sentence-final mitai na. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 29(2). 55–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/489589.Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2000. Turn projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(1). 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3301_1.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. & Ryoko Suzuki. 2014. Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies 16(6). 1–31.10.1177/1461445614546259Search in Google Scholar

Traverso, Véronique. 2008. The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics 41(12). 2385–2399.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.047Search in Google Scholar

Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2007. An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Mari. 2014. Monogatari no ukete niyoru serifu hatsuwa: sanyosha kan no kyookan kankee no koochiku ni kansuru kaiwabunseki teki kenkyuu [Serifu utterances by recipients of storytelling: Conversation analytic research on participants’ construction of empathetic relationship]. Hokkaido University Unpublished doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar