Home Linguistics & Semiotics “Hope it’s not just the honeymoon phase”: online discursive portrayals of migrant domestic helpers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Hope it’s not just the honeymoon phase”: online discursive portrayals of migrant domestic helpers

  • Janet Ho

    Janet Ho is an assistant professor of applied linguistics at Lingnan University. Her research interests lie in metaphor studies and discourse analysis. Her recent publications have appeared in refereed journals including Metaphor and Symbol, Discourse Studies, and Visual Communication. Address for correspondence: Department of English, Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 4, 2021

Abstract

This paper examines online discursive representations of migrant domestic helpers (MDHs) by Hong Kong employers. Unlike existing research, which concentrates on the experiences of MDHs from their own perspectives, this study focuses on positive narrations about MDHs by their employers. Using critical discourse analysis, this study identified the discursive strategies deployed to portray MDHs in more than 2,000 Facebook posts. The findings reveal that, although the interlocutors attempted to commend the MDHs in their employ, they also emphasised their own superiority by portraying themselves as gastronomic experts, good educators, and benefactors, thus developing an ideological paradox. Another dimension of ideological ambivalence concerned the discursive conflict between their high expectations from the MDHs and their underlying belief that domestic work neither requires skills nor deserves high pay. Taken together, these factors are responsible for the entrenchment of the inferior image of MDHs in Hong Kong society, despite the persistent endeavours of activist groups to spread awareness of their exploitation.


Corresponding author: Janet Ho, Department of English, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, E-mail:

About the author

Janet Ho

Janet Ho is an assistant professor of applied linguistics at Lingnan University. Her research interests lie in metaphor studies and discourse analysis. Her recent publications have appeared in refereed journals including Metaphor and Symbol, Discourse Studies, and Visual Communication. Address for correspondence: Department of English, Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

Acknowledgement

I am indebted to the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Arrigaguada, Irma. 2009. Feminization of migration in Latin America: Domestic workers. Focal Point 8(12). 1–4.Search in Google Scholar

Baldassar, Loretta, Laura Ferrero & Lucia Portis. 2017. ‘More like a daughter than an employee’: The kinning process between migrant care workers, elderly care receivers and their extended families. Identities 24(5). 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289x.2017.1345544.Search in Google Scholar

Britz, Johannes J. 2004. To know or not to know: A moral reflection on information poverty. Journal of Information Science 30(3). 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504044666.Search in Google Scholar

Bromme, Rainer. 2000. Beyond one’s own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In Weingart Peter & Nico Stehr (eds.), Practicing interdisciplinarity, 115–133. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442678729-008Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Caricati, Luca. 2017. Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis: A multilevel modeling approach to the perception of legitimacy in income distribution in 36 nations. The Journal of Social Psychology 157(5). 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1242472.Search in Google Scholar

Catalano, Theresa & Grace E. Fielder. 2018. European spaces and the Roma: Denaturalizing the naturalized in online reader comments. Discourse and Communication 12(3). 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757772.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Shu-Ju Ada. 2006. Serving the household and the nation: Filipina domestics and the politics of identity in Taiwan. Oxford: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Constable, Nicole. 1997a/2007. Maid to order in Hong Kong: Stories of migrant workers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9780801460463Search in Google Scholar

Constable, Nicole. 1997b. Sexuality and discipline among Filipina domestic workers in Hong Kong. American Ethnologist 24(3). 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1997.24.3.539.Search in Google Scholar

Constable, Nicole. 2013. Migrant workers, legal tactics, and fragile family formation in Hong Kong. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(6). 1004–1022.Search in Google Scholar

De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin & Michael Bamberg (eds.). 2006. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Discourse and identity, vol. 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7). 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00101-5.Search in Google Scholar

Gough, Brendan. 2016. Men’s depression talk online: A qualitative analysis of accountability and authenticity in help-seeking and support formulations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 17(2). 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039456.Search in Google Scholar

Gube, Jan & Casey Burkholder. 2019. Unresolved tensions in Hong Kong’s racialized discourse: Rethinking differences in educating about ethnic minorities. In Jan Gube & Gao Fang (eds.), Education, ethnicity, and equity in the multilingual Asian context, 105–112. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-3125-1_7Search in Google Scholar

Heyzer, Noeleen. 1994. Introduction: Creating responsive policies for migrant women domestic workers. In Noeleen Heyzer, Geertje Lycklama à Nijeholt & Nedra Weerakoon (eds.), The trade in domestic workers: Causes, mechanisms and consequences of international migration, xv–xxx. London and New Jersey: Zed Books Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Heyzer, Noeleen & Vivienne Wee. 1994. Domestic workers in trainsient overseas employment: Who benefits, who profits? In Noeleen Heyzer, Geertje Lycklama à Nijeholt & Nedra Weerakoon (eds.), The trade in domestic workers: Causes, mechanisms and consequences of international migration, 31–102. London and New Jersey: Zed Books Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, Janet. 2020. Discursive representations of domestic helpers in cyberspace. Discourse Studies 22(1). 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619887539.Search in Google Scholar

International Labour Organisation. 2015. Global estimates on migrant workers. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_436343.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Michael J. & Paul A. Shoemaker. 1994. Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature 13. 142–184.Search in Google Scholar

Joudo Larsen, Jacqueline. 2010. Migration and people trafficking in Southeast Asia. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 401. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Available at: https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi401.10.52922/ti281080Search in Google Scholar

Kresova, Nina & Anna Ivanova. 2013. “We” and “they” of Russian emigrant bloggers. Discourses about presidential election 2012. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 95. 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.632.Search in Google Scholar

Ladegaard, Hans J. 2012. The discourse of powerlessness and repression: Identity construction in domestic helper narratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(4). 450–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00541.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ladegaard, Hans J. 2013. Demonising the cultural other: Legitimising dehumanisation of foreign domestic helpers in the Hong Kong press. Discourse, Context & Media 2(3). 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Ladegaard, Hans J. 2017. The discourse of powerlessness and repression: Life stories of domestic migrant workers in Hong Kong. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315636597Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Jessie. 2021. In Hong Kong, COVID-19 and racism make an ugly mix. The Diplomat. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/in-hong-kong-covid-19-and-racism-make-an-ugly-mix/.Search in Google Scholar

Liebelt, Claudia. 2011. Caring for the holy land: Filipina domestic workers in Israel. New York: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar

Metcalfe, Beverly D. & Carol Woodhams. 2008. Critical perspectives in diversity and equality management. Gender in Management: An International Journal 23(6). 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410810897508.Search in Google Scholar

Padilla, Amado M. & William Perez. 2003. Acculturation, social identity and social cognition: A new perspective. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 25(1). 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303251694.Search in Google Scholar

Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2001/2015. Servants of globalization: Migration and domestic work. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804796187Search in Google Scholar

Pihlaja, Stephen & Andreas Musolff. 2017. Discourse and ideology. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 381–403. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110431070-014Search in Google Scholar

Rettberg, Jill W. & Radhika Gajjala. 2016. Terrorists or cowards: Negative portrayals of male Syrian refugees in social media. Feminist Media Studies 16(1). 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120493.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Daniel C. & Rick Dale. 2005. Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science 29(6). 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Simon. 2009. A constructed (un) reality on China’s re-entry into Africa: The Chinese online community perception of Africa (2006–2008). The Journal of Modern African Studies 47(3). 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x09003991.Search in Google Scholar

Stets, Jan E. & Peter J. Burke. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63. 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, Henri & John C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Stephen Worchel & William G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.10.4324/9780203505984-16Search in Google Scholar

Törnberg, Anton & Petter Törnberg. 2016. Combining CDA and topic modelling: Analysing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum. Discourse and Society 27(4). 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516634546.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 1991. Racism and the press. Oxfordshire: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Wodak Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 95–120. Newbury Park: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n5Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, Camilla & Alice Chik. 2015. ‘I am not a foodie …’: Culinary capital in online reviews of Michelin restaurants. Food and Foodways 23(4). 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2015.1102483.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Ina & Wodak Ruth. 2006. Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse and Society 17(3). 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060251.Search in Google Scholar

White, Clovis L. & Peter J. Burke. 1987. Ethnic role identity among black and white college students: An interactionist approach. Sociological Perspectives 30(3). 319–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389115.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In Wodak Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 63–94. Newbury Park: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n4Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. In Renkema Jan (ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 311–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.148.29wodSearch in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of critical discourse analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020Search in Google Scholar

Zdravomyslova, Elena & Olga Tkach. 2016. Cultural patterns of class inequality in the realm of paid domestic worker in Russia. Russian Review of Social Research 8(3). 170–177.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck & Jason Martin. 2008. Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behaviour 24(5). 1816–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-02
Accepted: 2021-09-21
Published Online: 2021-10-04
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2020-0100/html
Scroll to top button