Epistemic stance in the translations of Chinese medicine classics: a case study of Huang Di Nei Jing

References

Adolphs, Svenja, Sarah Atkins & Kevin Harvey. 2007. Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts. In Joan Cutting (ed.), Vague language explored, 62–78. New York: Springer.10.1057/9780230627420_4Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Roger Thomas & Christopher Candlin. 1991. Translation and translating: Theory and practice. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni & Andrzej Żuczkowski. 2018. Epistemic stance negotiation: Some examples from Italian conversations. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 135(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624sl.18.001.8161.Search in Google Scholar

Bosseaux, Charlotte. 2007. How does it feel? Point of view in translation: The case of Virginia Woolf into French. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401204408Search in Google Scholar

Carretero, Marta. 2002. The influence of genre and register on epistemic modality in spoken English: A preliminary study. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 10. 11–41.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Miao-Hsia, Yu-Wen Luo & Yueh-Kuei Hsu. 2012. Subjectivity and objectivity in Chinese academic discourse: How attribution hedges indicate authorial stance. Studies in Linguistics 38(2). 293–329.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Zhenzhen. 2012. Expression of epistemic stance in EFL Chinese university students writing. English Language Teaching 5(10). 173–179. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p173.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Gyung H. 2013. A study on logical meaning using SFL and the implications of this for translation studies. University of New South Wales PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cornillie, Bert. 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1). 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1991. Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. Asymmetries in Dialogue 29. 21–48.Search in Google Scholar

Eckman, Peter. 2014. Traditional Chinese medicine-science or pseudoscience? A response to Paul Unschuld. Journal of Chinese Medicine 2(104). 45–60.Search in Google Scholar

Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, Tony McEnery & Elaine Boyd. 2017. Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics 38(5). 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv055.Search in Google Scholar

González, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto. 2017. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua 186. 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.008.Search in Google Scholar

Haan, Ferdinand de. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1). 83–101.Search in Google Scholar

Haan, Ferdinand de. 2001. The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9. 201–216.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Handford, Michael. 2010. The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139525329Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103.Search in Google Scholar

Hofer, Barbara & Paul R. Pintrich. 1997. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research 67(1). 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088.Search in Google Scholar

House, Juliane. 2015. Translation quality assessment: Past and present. London: Routledge.10.1057/9781137025487_13Search in Google Scholar

Hoye, Leo F. 2005. You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment. Modality studies: Contemporary research and future directions. Journal of Pragmatics 37(9). 1481–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1994. Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13(3). 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1995. The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching 18. 33–42.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1996. Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13(2). 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004.Search in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think, vol. 115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.115Search in Google Scholar

Kranich, Svenja. 2009. Epistemic modality in English popular scientific texts and their German translations. Trans-kom 2(1). 26–41.Search in Google Scholar

Kranich, Svenja. 2016. Contrastive pragmatics and translation: Evaluation, epistemic modality and communicative styles in English and German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.261Search in Google Scholar

Lan, Fengli. 2005. 《 黄帝内经素问》 英译事业的描写性研究 [A descriptive study of the English translations of Huang Di Nei Jing]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 25(2). 176–180.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Zhaoguo. 2005. Yellow emperor’s cannon of medicine plain conversation. Xi’an: World Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Manfredi, Marina. 2011. Systemic functional linguistics as a tool for translation teaching: Towards a meaningful practice. International Journal of Translation 13. 49–62.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2003. The language of evaluation, vol. 2. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Martín, Pedro M. 2008. The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies 8(2). 133–152.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Moindjie, Mohamed A. 2015. The function of modality in translation. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies 3(2). 11–24.10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.3n.2p.11Search in Google Scholar

Munday, Jeremy. 1998. Problems of applying thematic analysis to translation between Spanish and English. Cadernos de tradução 1(3). 183–213.Search in Google Scholar

Ni, Maoshing. 1995. The yellow emperor’s classic of medicine: A new translation of the Neijing Suwen with commentary. Boston: Shambhala.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Johan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive- pragmatic perspective, vol. 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/hcp.5Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Johan. 2005. The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg Müller (eds.), Modality: Studies in form and function, 5–38. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Search in Google Scholar

Peterlin, Agnes P. 2010. Hedging devices in slovene-English translation: A corpus-based study. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 171–193.10.35360/njes.222Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Tyler. 2010. Epistemic modality and evidentiality in gitksan at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 2010. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Z’ev. 2013. Interview of Paul Unschuld. Journal of Chinese Medicine 103(10). 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Rouet, Jean-Francois, Monik Favart, Mary A. Britt & Charles Perfetti. 1997. Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction 15(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3.Search in Google Scholar

Rowland, Tim. 2007. Well maybe not exactly, but it’s around fifty basically? Vague language in mathematics classrooms. In Joan Cutting (ed.), Vague language explored, 79–96. New York: Springer.10.1057/9780230627420_5Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, Victoria L. 2010. Epistemic modality: From uncertainty to certainty in the context of information seeking as interactions with texts. Information Processing and Management 46(5). 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.02.006.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, Victoria, Elizabeth D. Liddy & Noriko Kando. 2006. Certainty identification in texts: Categorization model and manual tagging results. In James G. Shanahan, Yan Qu & Janyce Wiebe (eds.), Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, 61–76. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_7Search in Google Scholar

Šolienė, Audronė. 2007. Epistemic modality in English and lithuanian translations. Kalba ir kontekstai 2. 90–102.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2004. Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in romance. Lingua 114(7). 873–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00064-0.Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, Erich. 2004. The heterogeneity of individual languages as a translation problem. In Harald Kittel, Armin Paul Frank, Norbert Greiner, Theo Hermans, Werner Koller, José Lambert & Paul Fritz (eds.), Translation: An international encyclopedia of translation studies, 446–454. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110137088.1.6.446Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2005. Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2). 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1.Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jackob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jackob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002Search in Google Scholar

Strømsø, Helge I., Ivar Bråten & Mary A. Britt. 2011. Do students’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgement of texts’ trustworthiness? Educational Psychology 31(2). 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.538039.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoffrey. 1996. Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Trappes-Lomax, Hugh. 2007. Vague language as a means of self-protective avoidance: Tension management in conference talks. In Joan Cutting (ed.), Vague language explored, 117–137. New York: Springer.10.1057/9780230627420_7Search in Google Scholar

Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang. 2019. Perceptions of and attitudes toward elastic language in online health communication in Chinese. Lingua 233. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102750.Search in Google Scholar

Unschuld, Paul U. & Tessenow Hermann. 2011. Huang Di nei jing su wen. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520948181Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez, Ignacio & Diana Giner. 2008. Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. A cross-disciplinary study. Alicante Journal of English Studies/Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21. 171–190. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.10.Search in Google Scholar

Wilss, Wolfram. 1996. Knowledge and skills in translator behavior, vol. 15. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/btl.15Search in Google Scholar

Wineburg, Sam. 1991. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 83(1). 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73.Search in Google Scholar

World Health Organization. 2007. WHO International standard terminologies on traditional medicine in the Western Pacific Region. Manila: WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Canzhong. 2000. Modelling linguistic resources: A systemic functional approach. Sydney: Macquarie University PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Canzhong. 2009. Corpus-based research. A companion to systemic functional linguistics. In Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 128–142. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Qi & Lian-ShengWu. 1997. Yellow emperor’s cannon of internal medicine. Bei Jing: China Science and Technology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xiao, Tianjin. 2009. We can probably go there: English modal satellite adverbs and modality supplementing in discourse. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(3). 281–301.10.1558/lhs.v5i3.281Search in Google Scholar

Yang, An, Shu-Yuan Zheng & Guang-Chun Ge. 2015. Epistemic modality in English-medium medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes 38. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Hailing & Canzhong Wu. 2016. Recreating the image of chan master Huineng: The roles of MOOD and MODALITY. Functional Linguistics 3(4). 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0027-z.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Grace. 2015. Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139236218Search in Google Scholar

Zupan, Simon. 2016. Epistemic modality in translation: Poe’s “The Fall of the House of Usher”. AAA-Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 41. 5–24.Search in Google Scholar