Comparing the wine tasting notes of Jancis Robinson and Terry Theise: A stylistic analysis

References

Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.4m) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/.Suche in Google Scholar

Askehave, Inger & John M. Swales. 2001. Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics 21. 195–212.10.1093/applin/22.2.195Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Bratož, Silva. 2013. Anthropomorphic metaphor in Slovene and English wine tasting discourses. English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries 10(1). 13–25.10.4312/elope.10.1.23-35Suche in Google Scholar

Caballero, Rosario. 2007. Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics 39(12). 2095–2114.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005Suche in Google Scholar

Carman, Tim. March 16, 2017. The mysterious demise of Lucky Peach magazine and its uncertain future. Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/food/wp/2017/03/16/the-mysterious-demise-of-lucky-peach-magazine-and-its-uncertain-future/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6b9885799668 (accessed 2 November 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Coffin, Lilia. 2015. November 3. An evening with Jancis Robinson. HillRag.com. Available at: http://www.capitalcommunitynews.com/content/evening-jancis-robinson (accessed 13 December 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorising dialect style in sociolinguistics. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 185–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.012Suche in Google Scholar

Crystal, David & Derek Davy. 1969. Investigating English style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1973. Linguistic stylistics. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783111348926Suche in Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel. 2006. The teaching of stylistics. Subject Centre for Languages, good practice guide. Available at https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/2755.html (accessed 24 June 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, Sharmila Pixy. 2002. Electronic writing: Effects of computers on traditional writing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 8(2). University of Michigan Press. Available at: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/08-01/ferris.html (accessed 13 December 2016)10.3998/3336451.0008.104Suche in Google Scholar

Fowler, Roger. 1977. Linguistics and the novel. London: Methuen.Suche in Google Scholar

Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Charlotte Taylor & Anna Marchi (eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–258. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315179346-11Suche in Google Scholar

Gluck, Malcolm. 2003. Wine language: Useful idiom or idiot speak? In Jean Aitchison & Diana M. Lewis (eds.), New media language, 107–115. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hommerberg, Charlotte. 2011. Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hommerberg, Charlotte. 2015. Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining appraisal and argumentation analysis. Text & Talk 35. 155–175.10.1515/text-2014-0033Suche in Google Scholar

Hommerberg, Charlotte & Alexanne Don. 2015. Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language 22(2). 161–191.10.1075/fol.22.2.01homSuche in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. 2001. Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rockford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.002Suche in Google Scholar

Jeffries, Lesley. 2010. Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4Suche in Google Scholar

Kittay, Eva Feder. 1990. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242468.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kramsch, Claire. 1998. Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2007. Can wines be brawny? In Barry. C. Smith (ed.), A question of taste: The philosophy of wine, 127–140. Oxford: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2009. Wine and Conversation. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Livsey, Alan. December 16, 2016. Wine expert Robert Parker leaves a pointed legacy. Financial Times. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/73ea0bfa-afd1-11e6-9c37-5787335499a0 (accessed 27 October 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

López-Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts. 2014. English and Spanish descriptors in wine tasting terminology. Terminology 20(1). 25–49.10.1075/term.20.1.02lopSuche in Google Scholar

López-Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts. 2015. How specific wine tasting descriptors are? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 198. 287–299.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.447Suche in Google Scholar

López-Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts. 2017. Metaphors in wine-tasting notes in English and Spanish. Herme¯neus: Revista De Traducción E Interpretación 19. 139–163.10.24197/her.19.2017.139-163Suche in Google Scholar

McIntyre, Dan. 2012. Linguistics and literature: Stylistics as a tool for the literary critic. SRC Working Papers 1. 1–11.Suche in Google Scholar

Nabhan, Gary Paul. 2014. Cumin, camels, and caravans: A spice odyssey. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor & Symbol 28(1). 1–19.10.1080/10926488.2013.742838Suche in Google Scholar

Paradis, Carita & Charlotte Hommerberg. 2016. We drink with our eyes first: The web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (eds.), Mixing metaphor, 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/milcc.6.09parSuche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jancis. 2015. What future for expertise? Available at: http://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/what-future-for-expertise (accessed 13 December 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2004. ‘‘Cultural’’ concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology 45(5). 621–652.10.1086/423971Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203312612Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Paul. 2004. Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203496589Suche in Google Scholar

Sorlin, Sandrine. 2014. The ‘indisciplinarity’ of stylistics. Topics in Linguistics 141. 9–15. ISSN (Online). 1337–7590. 10.2478.Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez–Toste, Ernesto. 2007. Metaphor inside the wine cellar: On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak. Metaphorik.de. 122007. 53.Suche in Google Scholar

Theise, Terry. 2010. Reading between the vines. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520947054Suche in Google Scholar

Wine Folly. 2013. 120 Most Common Wine Descriptions (Infographic). Available at: http://winefolly.com/tutorial/wine-descriptions-chart-infographic/ (accessed 13 December 2016). page 22.Suche in Google Scholar