Startseite Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: The play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: The play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials

  • Feifei Liu

    Feifei Liu received her PhD in applied linguistics from the University of Technology Sydney and is currently a post-doctoral researcher at the South China Normal University. Her research interests include Systemic Functional Linguistics, appraisal framework, and discourse analysis in the media sphere.

    Address for correspondence: Room 738, School of Foreign Studies, Wenke Building, South China Normal University, No. 55 Zhongshan Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Email: liufeifei@m.scnu.edu.cn

    EMAIL logo
    und Susan Hood

    Susan Hood is an Honorary Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Sydney. Her research focuses on discourse analysis from the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics, with particular interest in discourse of evaluation and of knowledge building. Major publications include: Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing (2010, London: Palgrave); Knowledge-building: Educational studies in legitimation code theory (2016, London: Routledge).

    Address for correspondence: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney. NSW 2006, Australia. Email: susan.hood@sydney.edu.au

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Juli 2019

Abstract

Newspaper editorials are acknowledged as having a significant role to play in shaping public opinion on social and political issues. In studies of their persuasive power, the language of these texts is always the focus to some extent. Across a spectrum of methodological approaches, relatively few studies take a dynamic perspective to consider the interaction of linguistic choices in the construction of rhetorical strategies in the flow of meaning in texts. This study draws on Systemic Functional Linguistic (SFL) theory in its analysis and interpretation of the dynamic construction of recurring rhetorical strategies in a set of 11 editorials culled from The Australian, a politically conservative broadsheet newspaper in Australia. We explore how choices in interpersonal and ideational meaning collaborate and interact dynamically in these data to consistently disaffiliate a putative readership with one of the two major political parties. We identify in particular the critical interaction of realis and irrealis meanings in the configuration of this strategy. The analyses provide a complementary means to explore the discourse of persuasion within the field of news media.

Funding statement: This paper was partially supported by two research projects. One is South China Normal University Foundation for Young Scholars (No. 18SK11), and the other is Guangzhou Yangcheng Foundation for Young Scholars (No. 2019GZQN18).

About the authors

Feifei Liu

Feifei Liu received her PhD in applied linguistics from the University of Technology Sydney and is currently a post-doctoral researcher at the South China Normal University. Her research interests include Systemic Functional Linguistics, appraisal framework, and discourse analysis in the media sphere.

Address for correspondence: Room 738, School of Foreign Studies, Wenke Building, South China Normal University, No. 55 Zhongshan Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Email: liufeifei@m.scnu.edu.cn

Susan Hood

Susan Hood is an Honorary Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Sydney. Her research focuses on discourse analysis from the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics, with particular interest in discourse of evaluation and of knowledge building. Major publications include: Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing (2010, London: Palgrave); Knowledge-building: Educational studies in legitimation code theory (2016, London: Routledge).

Address for correspondence: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney. NSW 2006, Australia. Email: susan.hood@sydney.edu.au

References

Almutairi, Bandar. 2014. Visualizing evaluative language in relation to constructing identity in English editorials and op-eds. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ansary, Hasan & Esmat Babaii. 2005. The generic integrity of newspaper editorials: A systemic functional perspective. RELC Journal 36(3). 271–295.10.1177/0033688205060051Suche in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika & James R. Martin (eds.). 2010. New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay. 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolívar, Adriana. 1994. The structure of newspaper editorials. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 276–294. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonyadi, Alireza. 2010. The rhetorical properties of the schematic structures of newspaper editorials: A comparative study of English and Persian editorials. Discourse & Communication 4(4). 323–342.10.1177/1750481310381579Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, YuLi. 2015. Framing of the immigration reform in 2006: A community structure approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(4). 839–856.10.1177/1077699015594462Suche in Google Scholar

Fartousi, Hassan. 2012. A rhetorical analysis of a daily editorial: ‘Wishing Iraq well’. Advances in Asian Social Science 1(2). 197–204.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Hao, Jing. 2015. Construing biology: An ideational perspective. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Happer, Catherine & Greg Philo. 2016. New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change. European Journal of Communication 31(2). 136–151.10.1177/0267323115612213Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230274662Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2012. Voice and stance as APPRAISAL: Persuading and positioning in research writing across intellectual fields. In Carmen S. Guinda & Ken Hyland (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres, 51–68. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137030825_4Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2019. Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 382–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.017Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan & James R. Martin. 2007. Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, vol. 2, 739–764. London: Equinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi. 2010. Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 35–55. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi. 2013. Evaluating experience in funny ways: How friends bond through conversational humor. Text & Talk 33(4–5). 553–574.10.1515/text-2013-0025Suche in Google Scholar

Knox, John S. 2009. Multimodal discourse on online newspaper home pages: A social-semiotic perspective. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Le, Elisabeth. 2003. Information sources as a persuasive strategy in editorials: Le Monde and. The New York Times. Written Communication 20(4). 478–510.10.1177/0741088303259873Suche in Google Scholar

Le, Elisabeth. 2004. Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics 36(4). 687–714.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00032-8Suche in Google Scholar

Le, Elisabeth. 2010. Editorials and the power of media: Interweaving of socio-cultural identities. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.35Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Feifei. 2017. Strategies for affiliation in media editorials: Persuading and aligning readers. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Feifei. 2018. Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics 5(2). 1–14.10.1186/s40554-018-0054-zSuche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.59Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Geoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2010. Semantic variation: Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2011. Multimodal semiotics: Theoretical challenges. In Shoshana Dreyfus, Susan Hood & Marie Stenglin (eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities, 243–270. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2017. The discourse semantics of attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21(1). 22–47.10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-22-47Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 2010. Deploying functional grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Suche in Google Scholar

Santosa, Riyadi. 2009. Genre in media discourse. Journal of Bahasa Sastra Dan Studi Amerika 1(1). 1–23.Suche in Google Scholar

Szenes, Eszter. 2017. The linguistic construction of business reasoning: Towards a language-based model of decision-making in undergraduate business. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra & William Mann. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. Papers in Pragmatics 1(1). 79–105.10.1075/iprapip.1.1.03thoSuche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Tuen. 1996. Power and the news media. In L. Paletz David (ed.), Political communication in action: States, institutions, movements, audiences, 9–36. Cresskilll, N.J.: Hampton Press.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Peter. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23(2). 259–284.10.1515/text.2003.011Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5). 788–806.10.1177/1461444810385097Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele, Paul Dwyer & James R. Martin. 2008. Syndromes of meaning: Exploring patterned coupling in a NSW Youth Justice Conference. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Questioning linguistics, 103–117. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Zarza, Sahar & Helen Tan. 2016. Patterns of schematic structure and strategic features in newspaper editorials: A comparative study of American and Malaysian editorials. Discourse & Communication 10(6). 635–657.10.1177/1750481316674754Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-27
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2019-2041/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen