Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach

Bal, Mieke. 1991. Reading ‘Rembrandt’: Beyond the word-image opposition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio. 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 202–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. The case of a metonymy basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 81–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.113.07barSearch in Google Scholar

Bartsch, Renate. 2002. Generating polysemy: Metaphor and metonymy. In René. Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 49–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dirven, René & Ralf Pörings (eds.), 2002. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219197Search in Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elizabeth. 2003. Understanding visual vetaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication 2(1). 75–95.10.1177/1470357203002001755Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng. 2016. Metonymy and visual representation: Towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication 16(4). 441–466.10.1177/1470357217717142Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng & Kay O’Halloran. 2013. The multimodal representation of emotion in films: Integrating cognitive and semiotic approaches. Semiotica 197. 79–100.10.1515/sem-2013-0082Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng & Kay O’Halloran. 2014. The visual representation of metaphor. A social semiotic approach. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2). 320–335.10.1075/rcl.11.2.07fenSearch in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial metaphors in advertising. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203272305Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2009. Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In Eija Ventola & Arsenio Jesús Moya-Guijarro (eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues, 57–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond. 1999. Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164054Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 1977. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3). 491–511.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, MAK. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. Third Edition. Revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, Peter (ed.), 2004. International companion encyclopedia of children’s literature, Vol. I, 2nd edn, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203325667Search in Google Scholar

Köcecses, Zoltán. 2013. The metaphor-metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symble 28(2). 75–88.10.1080/10926488.2013.768498Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006 [1996]. Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Geoff. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous hings: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Geoff & Mark Johnson 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107338814Search in Google Scholar

Markert, Katja & Malvina Nissim. 2003. Corpus-based metonymy analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 18(3). 175–188.10.1207/S15327868MS1803_04Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Jim & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús. 2014. A multimodal analysis of picture books for chilldren. A systemic-functional approach. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús. 2015. Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. In Mª Jesús Pinar (ed.), Multimodality and cognitive linguistics, 115–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.78.08moySearch in Google Scholar

Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús. 2017. Processing reality in picture books: A multimodal systemic functional and cognitive study. In Stella Newmann et al. (eds.), Challenging boundaries in linguistics. Systemic functional perspectives, 431–458. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 2004. The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning Construction. Metaphorik 6. 91–116.Search in Google Scholar

Painter, Claire, Jim Martinand & Len Unsworth. 2013. Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1984. La Representación del Mundo del Niño [The child’s conception of the word], 6th Edición. Madrid: Morata.Search in Google Scholar

Pinar, María Jesús. J. (ed.). 2015. Multimodality and cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Qui, Yingying 2013. Interaction of mMultimodal metaphor and metonymy in public service advertising: A case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3. 1584–1589.10.4304/tpls.3.9.1584-1589Search in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter & Zoltán Kóvecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In Klaus-Uwe Panthe & Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, 17–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.4.03radSearch in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco. 2000. The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 109–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110894677.109Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco & Olga Díez, 2002. Patterns of conceptual interaction. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 489–532. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Serafini, Frank. 2014. Reading the visual. An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Silva-Díaz, María Cecilia. 2002. Ejercicios en metaficción: El entrenamiento del lector-Browne [Tasks on metafiction: Training Browne’s reader] Espacios para la lectura 6(6–7). 22–25.Search in Google Scholar

Shie, Jian-Shuing. 2011. Metaphors and metonymies in New York Times and Times supplement news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1318–1334.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.026Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1985. Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, James. 2002. Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 323–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, Nicholas. 2002. The rough guide to children’s books 5–11 years. London: Rough Guides.Search in Google Scholar

Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo. 2009. Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 95–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo. 2010. The body of love in Almodóvar’s cinema: Metaphor and metonymy of the body and body parts. Metaphor and Symbol 25(3). 181–203.10.1080/10926488.2010.489395Search in Google Scholar

Ventola, Eija & Arsenio Jesus Moya-Guijarro (eds.). 2009. The world told and the world shown. Multisemiotic issues. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245341Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Beatrice. 2002. An alternative account on the interpretation of referential metonymy and metaphor. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 113–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wignell, Peter. 2008. How am I supposed to know how to read this? Intertextual and intratextual cues and clues to how to ‘perform’ books for young children. Paper presented at ISFC 35 on Voices around the World, Macquarie University, 26–28 July.Search in Google Scholar

Picture books

Browne, Anthony. 1999 [1998]. Voices in the Park. London: Picture Corgi Books.Search in Google Scholar

Browne, Anthony. 2002 [1983]. Gorilla. London: Walker Books.Search in Google Scholar

Browne, Anthony, 2008 [1986]. Piggybook. London: Walker Books.Search in Google Scholar