Home Adjective complementation patterns and judgement: Aligning lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches in appraisal research
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Adjective complementation patterns and judgement: Aligning lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches in appraisal research

  • Hang Su

    Hang Su is a professorial research fellow at Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China. His research interests include corpus linguistics, systemic functional linguistics, and (corpus) pragmatics. His recent publications have appeared in, for example, Applied Linguistics, Journal of Pragmatics, Pragmatics, English Today, and Language Resources and Evaluation. Address for correspondence: Centre for Linguistic, Literary & Cultural Studies, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, 400031, China. Email: suhangunique@hotmail.com

    EMAIL logo
    and Susan Hunston

    Susan Hunston is a Professor of English Language at the University of Birmingham, UK. Her research interests include corpus linguistics, systemic functional linguistics etc. She has published widely in Applied Linguistics, Text & Talk, Functions of Language, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, among many others, and is the author of monographs published by Cambridge University Press, Routledge, and John Benjamins. Address for correspondence: Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Email: s.e.hunston@bham.ac.uk

Published/Copyright: February 27, 2019

Abstract

This study takes a lexical-grammatical approach to exploring the evaluation of human behaviour and/or character. It uses adjective complementation patterns as the starting point to examine the lexical-grammatical resources at risk in the appraisal system of judgement, aiming to explore the extent to which we can arrive at the same categorization of the resources realizing judgement if a formal or lexical-grammatical approach, rather than a discourse-semantic one, is taken. Using a corpus compiled of texts categorized as ‘Biography’ in the British National Corpus, the study, on the one hand, shows that most of the items identified can be very satisfactorily classified in terms posited in the judgement system, suggesting that the nomenclature from that model is useful. On the other hand, a considerable number of items have also been identified which construe attitudes towards emotional types of personality traits, leading to the proposal of a potentially useful new judgement category and further an adjusted system of judgement. The heuristic potential of aligning the lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches to appraisal is further discussed.

About the authors

Hang Su

Hang Su is a professorial research fellow at Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China. His research interests include corpus linguistics, systemic functional linguistics, and (corpus) pragmatics. His recent publications have appeared in, for example, Applied Linguistics, Journal of Pragmatics, Pragmatics, English Today, and Language Resources and Evaluation. Address for correspondence: Centre for Linguistic, Literary & Cultural Studies, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, 400031, China. Email: suhangunique@hotmail.com

Susan Hunston

Susan Hunston is a Professor of English Language at the University of Birmingham, UK. Her research interests include corpus linguistics, systemic functional linguistics etc. She has published widely in Applied Linguistics, Text & Talk, Functions of Language, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, among many others, and is the author of monographs published by Cambridge University Press, Routledge, and John Benjamins. Address for correspondence: Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Email: s.e.hunston@bham.ac.uk

Acknowledgement

We thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier versions of this paper. The first author, Hang Su, would also like to acknowledge the support he got for this study from the National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education (MOE Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities), Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, where he has been an Adjunct Research Fellow.

References

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery & Ruth Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3). 273–306.10.1177/0957926508088962Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Erez Levon. 2015. Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication 9(2). 221–236.10.1177/1750481314568542Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in media discourse. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2007. Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and topological perspectives. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3(2). 107–136.10.1558/lhs.v3i2.107Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion talk across corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230285712Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2009. Language patterns and attitude. Functions of Language 16(2). 165–192.10.1075/fol.16.2.01bedSearch in Google Scholar

Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Hidalgo-Tenorio. Encarnación. 2019. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy: A psychologically-inspired approach to the linguistic expression of emotion. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Emotion in discourse, 307–338. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.302.12benSearch in Google Scholar

Fehr, Beverley & James Russell. 1984. Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of experimental psychology 113(3). 464–486.10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning. 1998. Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edn. Arnold: London.Search in Google Scholar

Hasan, Ruquiya. 1987. The grammarian’s dream: lexis as most delicate grammar. In M. A. K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics Volume 1: Theory and Description, 184–211. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nicholas Smith, David Lee & Ylva Berglund Prytz. 2008. Corpus linguistics with BNCweb: A practical guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Hommerberg, Charlotte & Alexanne Don. 2015. Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the Appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language 22(2). 161–191.10.1075/fol.22.2.01homSearch in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2). 249–268.10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hunSearch in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203841686Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2013. Systemic functional linguistics, corpus linguistics, and the ideology of science. Text & Talk 33(4-5). 617–640.10.1515/text-2013-0028Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan & Hang Su 2017. Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics 1–28. doi:10.1093/applin/amx046.Search in Google Scholar

Hyon, Sunny. 2011. Evaluation in tenure and promotion letters: Constructing faculty as communicators, stars, and workers. Applied Linguistics 32(4). 389–407.10.1093/applin/amr003Search in Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Keith Oatley. 1989. The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition & emotion 3(2). 81–123.10.1080/02699938908408075Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2015. Evaluative stances in persuasive essays by undergraduate students: Focusing on appreciation resources. Text & Talk 35(1). 49–76.10.1515/text-2014-0029Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James. 2000. Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James. 2017. The discourse semantics of attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21(1). 22–47.10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-22-47Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1991. Systemic typology and topology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy in social processes, 345–383. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Northern Territory University, Australia.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam. 2010. Key terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Millar, Neil & Susan Hunston. 2015. Adjectives, communities, and taxonomies of evaluative meaning. Functions of Language 22(3). 297–331.10.1075/fol.22.3.01milSearch in Google Scholar

Saucier, Gerard & Lewis Goldberg. 2001. Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of personality 69(6). 847–879.10.1111/1467-6494.696167Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar

Su, Hang & Monika Bednarek. 2018. Bibliography of appraisal, stance and evaluation. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329933952_Bibliography_of_appraisal_2018.Search in Google Scholar

Su, Hang & Susan Hunston. in press 2019. Language patterns and attitude revisited: Adjective patterns, attitude and appraisal. Functions of Language 26(3).10.1075/fol.16030.suSearch in Google Scholar

Su, Hang. 2015. Judgement and adjective complementation patterns in biographical discourse: A corpus study. Birmingham: University of Birmingham dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Teubert, Wolfgang. 2004. When did we start feeling guilty? In Edda Weigand (ed.), Emotion in dialogic interaction: Advances in the complex, 121–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.248.10teuSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff. 2010. Review of ‘Emotion talk across corpora’. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3(3). 399–404.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff. 2014. affect and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the appraisal model. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context, 47–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.242.03thoSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter. 2004. Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse. In Caroline Coffin (ed.), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches, 229–246. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter. 2011. Appraisal. In Jan Zienknowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Discursive pragmatics, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.8.02whiSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-02-27
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2019-2031/html
Scroll to top button