The intertextual nature of embedded email communication for contract negotiation activities

References

Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay. 2004. Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay. 2010. Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication 21(1). 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309351208.Search in Google Scholar

Bremner, Stephen. 2008. Intertextuality and business communication textbooks: Why students need more textual support. English for Specific Purposes 27. 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Candlin, Christopher. 1999. How can discourse be a measure of expertise? In Paper presented at the international association for dialogue analysis symposium: Expert talk. Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham, 8–10 April.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie. 2009. Professional communicative competences: Four key industries in Hong Kong. In Winnie Cheng & Kenneth C. C. Kong (eds.), Professional communication: Collaboration between academics and practitioners, 31–50. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.5790/hongkong/9789622099654.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie & Esmond Mok. 2008. Discourse processes and products: Land surveyors in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes 27. 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain & Wolfgang Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315835839Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, Amy. 1991. Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic referential and functional. In Charles Bazerman & Johanne Paradis (eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities, 336–357. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eklundh, Kerstin & Clare Macdonald. 1994. The use of quoting to preserve context in electronic mail dialogues. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 37(4). 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.365163.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Stephen. 2012. Designing email tasks for the business English classroom: Implications from a study of Hong Kong’s key industries. English for Specific Purposes 31. 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gains, Jonathan. 1999. Electronic mail – A new style of communication or just a new medium?: An investigation into the text features of email. English for Specific Purposes 18(1). 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00051-3.Search in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2005. Unpacking business emails: Message embeddedness in international business email communication. In Maurizio Gotti & Gillaerts Paul (eds.), Genre variation in business letters, 235–255. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2006. Embedded business emails: Meeting new demands in international business communication. English for Specific Purposes 25(2). 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Astrid. 2009. Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: A case study. English for Specific Purposes 28(1). 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Klee, Kenneth. 2003. Teaching transactional law. Law Review, 1–16. Los Angeles, California: University of California Law School Research Paper Series.Search in Google Scholar

Koriche, Hassiba. 2015. The emergence of a new discourse for business communication: A case study of e-mails in shipping company. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 199. 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.544.Search in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 1998. Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text & Talk 18(2). 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143.Search in Google Scholar

Nadler, Janice. 2004. Rapport in legal negotiation: How small talk can facilitate e-mail deal making. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 9. 223–251.Search in Google Scholar

Nickerson, Catherine. 2000. Playing the corporate language game. An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers working in multinational corporations. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004483842Search in Google Scholar

Orlikowski, Wanda & JoAnne Yates. 1994. Genre repertoire: Structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4). 541–574. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393771.Search in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant. 1998. Rethinking recontextualization in professional discourse studies: An epilogue. Text & Talk 18(2). 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.301.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John Malcolm. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John Malcolm. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar

Townley, Anthony. 2019. A pivotal interactional role to oversee contract negotiation activity: Insights into a key interdisciplinary legal-business practice. Discourse & Communication 13(2). 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318817622.Search in Google Scholar

Townley, Anthony & Alan Jones. 2016. The role of emails and covering letters in negotiating a legal contract: A case study from Turkey. English for Specific Purposes 44. 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Martin. 2013. “Just spoke to…”: The types and directionality of intertextuality in professional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 32(1). 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Martin. 2016. Signaling intertextuality in business emails. English for Specific Purposes 42. 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Yates, JoAnne, Wanda Orlikowski & Stephanie Woerner. 2003. Virtual organizing: Using threads to coordinate distributed work. MIT Sloan School Working Paper No. 4320-03.10.2139/ssrn.420521Search in Google Scholar