Startseite Changing patterns of self-citation: cumulative inquiry or self-promotion?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Changing patterns of self-citation: cumulative inquiry or self-promotion?

  • Ken Hyland

    Ken Hyland is Professor of Applied Linguistics in education at the University of East Anglia. He was previously a professor at University College London and the University of Hong Kong and has taught in Africa, Asia and Europe. He is best known for his research into writing and academic discourse, having published over 200 articles and 26 books on these topics with 36,000 citations on Google Scholar.

    EMAIL logo
    und Feng (Kevin) Jiang

    Feng (Kevin) Jiang is Distinguished Professor at the Faculty of Foreign Language Education at Jilin University, China. He gained his PhD under the supervision of Professor Ken Hyland at the Centre for Applied English Studies at the University of Hong Kong. His research interests include disciplinary discourse, corpus studies and academic writing, and his publications have appeared in most major applied linguistics journals.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Mai 2018

Abstract

Self-citations are a familiar, if sometimes controversial, element of academic knowledge construction and reputation-building, contributing to both the cumulative nature of academic research and helping writers to promote their scientific authority and enhance their careers. As scholarly publications become more specialized, more collaborative and more important for promotion and tenure, we might expect self-citation to play a more visible role in published research and this paper explores this possibility. Here we trace patterns of self-citation in papers from the same five journals in four disciplines at three time periods over the past 50 years, selected according to their impact ranking in 2015. We identify a large increase in self-citations although this is subject to disciplinary variation and tempered by a huge rise in citations overall, so that self-citation has fallen as a proportion of all citations. We attempt to account for these changes and give a rhetorical explanation for authorial practices.

About the authors

Ken Hyland

Ken Hyland is Professor of Applied Linguistics in education at the University of East Anglia. He was previously a professor at University College London and the University of Hong Kong and has taught in Africa, Asia and Europe. He is best known for his research into writing and academic discourse, having published over 200 articles and 26 books on these topics with 36,000 citations on Google Scholar.

Feng (Kevin) Jiang

Feng (Kevin) Jiang is Distinguished Professor at the Faculty of Foreign Language Education at Jilin University, China. He gained his PhD under the supervision of Professor Ken Hyland at the Centre for Applied English Studies at the University of Hong Kong. His research interests include disciplinary discourse, corpus studies and academic writing, and his publications have appeared in most major applied linguistics journals.

Appendix. Journal list

Applied linguistics

TESOL Quarterly (1967–)

Language Learning (1948–)

Foreign Language Annals (1967–)

Modern Language Journal (1916–)

College Composition and Communication (1950–)

Sociology

American Journal of Sociology (1895–)

Social Problems (1953–)

The British Journal of Sociology (1950–)

American Journal of Economics and Sociology (1941–)

The Sociological Quarterly (1960–)

Biology

The Quarterly Review of Biology (1926–)

Biological Reviews (1923–)

Radiation Research (1954–)

BioScience (1964–)

The Journal of Experimental Biology (1923–)

Electrical engineering

Proceedings of the IEEE (1963–)

Automatica (1963–)

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (1963–)

IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (1966–)

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (1963–)

References

Abraham, Philip. 2000. Duplicate and salami publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 46(2). 67–69.Suche in Google Scholar

Ädel, Annelie & Gregory Garretson. 2006. Citation practices across the disciplines: The case of proficient student writing. In Perez-Llantada Carmen, Ramon Plo-Alastrue & Neumann Claus-Peter (eds.), Academic and professional communication in the twenty-first century: Genres and rhetoric in the construction of disciplinary knowledge, 271–280. Zaragoza, Spain: Prensas Universitarias.Suche in Google Scholar

Aksnes, Dag W. 2003. A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56(2). 235–246.10.1023/A:1021919228368Suche in Google Scholar

Anthony, Laurence. 2011. AntConc 3.4.3. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. & Jonathan Q. Tritt. 2013. Rational choice theory: Resisting colonisation. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9780203133897Suche in Google Scholar

Becher, Tony & Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.Suche in Google Scholar

Berns, Margie & Paul K. Matsuda. 2006. Applied linguistics: Overview and history. In Keith Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., 398–401. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00599-XSuche in Google Scholar

Bonzi, Susan & Herbert W. Snyder. 1991. Motivations for citation: A comparison of self-citation and citation to others. Scientometrics 21(2). 245–254.10.1007/BF02017571Suche in Google Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz & Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2008. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 64(1). 45–80.10.1108/00220410810844150Suche in Google Scholar

Broad, William J. 1981. The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science 211(4487). 1137–1139.10.1126/science.7008199Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, Yu-Ying. 2006. How do well-established scholars cite themselves over their academic careers? Six stories of six well-established scholars. Paper presented at Conference in Honour of John Swales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. 22–23 June.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappelle, Carol A. 2012. The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics, 10 volume set. Oxford: Wiley & Blackwell.10.1002/9781405198431Suche in Google Scholar

Costas, Rodrigo, Thed N. van Leeuwen & María. Bordons. 2010. Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: Effects of different calculation methods. Scientometrics 82(3). 517–537.10.1007/s11192-010-0187-7Suche in Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise. 1981. The need for a theory of citation. Journal of Documentation 37(1). 16–24.10.1108/eb026703Suche in Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise & Debora Shaw. 2002. Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics 54(1). 31–49.10.1023/A:1015628320056Suche in Google Scholar

Fowler, James H. & Dag W. Aksnes. 2007. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 72(3). 427–437.10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2Suche in Google Scholar

Gartell, David C. & John W. Gartell. 1996. Positivism in sociological practice: 1967–1990. Canadian Review of Sociology 33(2). 143–158.10.1111/j.1755-618X.1996.tb00192.xSuche in Google Scholar

Gilbert, Nigel G. & Michael Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A sociological analysis of scientific discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Glanzel, Wolfgang, Koenraad Debackere, Bart Thijs & András. Schubert. 2006. A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. Scientometrics 67(2). 263–277.10.1007/s11192-006-0098-9Suche in Google Scholar

Glanzel, Wolfgang & Bart Thijs. 2004. Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics 61(3). 395–404.10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045117.13348.b1Suche in Google Scholar

Harwood, Nigel. 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citation in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 41(3). 497–518.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001Suche in Google Scholar

Harzing, Anne-Wil. 2013. The Publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Melbourne: Tarma.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2003. Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(3). 251–259.10.1002/asi.10204Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2017. Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx01210.1093/applin/amx012Suche in Google Scholar

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2015. A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78(1). 7–11.10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008Suche in Google Scholar

Kagg, John. 2013. On writing with others. The New York Times. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/24/on-writing-with-others/?ref=opinion&_r=0 (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

King, Molly M., Carl T. Bergstrom, Shelley J. Correll, Jennifer Jacquet & Jevin D. West 2015. Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Working paper. http://www.eigenfactor.org/gender/self-citation/SelfCitation.pdf (accessed 20 July 2016).10.1177/2378023117738903Suche in Google Scholar

Maliniak, Daniel, Ryan Powers & Barbara F. Walter. 2013. The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization 67(4). 889–922.10.1017/S0020818313000209Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, Mark. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America 98(2). 404–409.10.1073/pnas.98.2.404Suche in Google Scholar

NSF. 2012. Science & engineering indicators. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12 (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Parsons, Chris. 2015. The dangers of excessive self-citation. Southern Fried Science. http://www.southernfriedscience.com/the-dangers-of-excessive-self-citation (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Peritz, Bluma C. & Judit Bar-Ilan. 2001. The inside-outside looking of the field of bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. In Mari Davis & Concepción S. Wilson (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, 511–522. Sydney: BIRG.Suche in Google Scholar

Phelan, Thomas J. 1999. A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics 45(1). 117–136.10.1007/BF02458472Suche in Google Scholar

Pichappan, Pit & Subramaniam Sarasvady. 2002. The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics 54(2). 285–290.10.1023/A:1016070029935Suche in Google Scholar

Prichard, Alan. 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation 25(4). 348–349.10.1108/eb026482Suche in Google Scholar

Public Policy Group. 2011. Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists. LSE Public Policy Group. Consultation draft 3. http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/LSEPublicPolicy/Docs/LSE_Impact_Handbook_April_2011.pdf (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Rousseau, Ronald. 1999. Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics 44(3). 521–531.10.1007/BF02458493Suche in Google Scholar

Rowe, Martin. 2016. Electrical engineering in the 1960s: The transistor changed everything. EDN network. http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/rowe-s-and-columns/4442619/Electrical-engineering-in-the-1950s-and-60s–The-transistor-changed-everything (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Ruscio, Kenneth P. 1985. Bridging specialisations: Reflections from biology and political science. Review of Higher Education 10(1). 29–45.10.1353/rhe.1986.0010Suche in Google Scholar

Safer, Martin A. & Rong Tang. 2009. The psychology of referencing in psychology journal articles. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(1). 51–53.10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01104.xSuche in Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2008. A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7. 55–67.10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

Schubert, András, Wolfgang Glanzel & Bart. Thijs. 2006. The weight of author self-citations: A fractional approach to self-citation counting. Scientometrics 67(3). 503–514.10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.11Suche in Google Scholar

Shema, Hadas. 2012. On self-citation. Scientific American Blog network. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/on-self-citation (accessed 20 July 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Snyder, Herbert & Susan. Bonzi. 1998. Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of Information Science 24(6). 432–435.10.1177/016555159802400606Suche in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thijs, Bart & Wolfgang. Glanzel. 2006. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicators: The case of European universities. Scientometrics 66(1). 71–80.10.1007/s11192-006-0006-3Suche in Google Scholar

Thomson Reuters. 2012. Global publishing: Changes in submission trends and the impact on scholarly publishers. Thomson-Reuters White Paper. http://scholarone.com/media/pdf/GlobalPublishing_WP.pdf. (accessed 20 July 2016)Suche in Google Scholar

Ware, Mark & Michael Mabe. 2012. The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, 3rd edn. Oxford: International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Howard D. 2001. Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(2). 87–108.10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-TSuche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-5-1
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2018-0004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen