Home Thematic choice and progression in English and Chinese radio news texts: a systemic functional analysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Thematic choice and progression in English and Chinese radio news texts: a systemic functional analysis

  • Lijin Liu

    Lijin Liu received his PhD in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics fromShanghai International Studies University and is Professor in Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. His research interests include discourse analysis, pragmatics, systemic functional linguistics, and cognitive linguistics. His recent publications include The Pragmatics of Logophoricity (2012) and “A typological study of motion events in modern Chinese” (2014, Chinese Teaching in the World, 3).

    EMAIL logo
    and Gordon Tucker

    Dr. Gordon Tucker was formerly senior lecturer in the Centre for Language and Communication Research at Cardiff University. Since his retirement he has retained an affiliation with Cardiff University. He is the co-developer, along with Professor Robin Fawcett, of the systemic functional model of language known as the Cardiff Grammar. He is author of The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A systemic functional approach to lexis (Cassell Academic 1998) and has published over forty journal articles and book chapters.

Published/Copyright: June 13, 2015

Abstract

This paper reports on a comparative study of thematic choice and progression in English and Chinese radio news texts, conducted within the systemic functional theory of Theme–Rheme (Halliday and Matthiessen 2004) and the thematic progression model evolving from Daneš’s work in the 1970s. It is suggested, following a detailed analysis of a corpus of sixty English and Chinese texts, that there are some similarities and disparities in structuring thematic information between the two languages. Overall, the key differences identified are that the English news tends to have a greater incidence of textual, and thus, multiple Themes, whereas the Chinese news tends to allow elliptical participants and circumstantial elements to be thematized more frequently. Such differences can be attributable to the distinctions in grammatical structure across the languages.

Funding statement: Funding: The research is supported by the Social Science Funds Project of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 13YJA740033).

About the authors

Lijin Liu

Lijin Liu received his PhD in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics fromShanghai International Studies University and is Professor in Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. His research interests include discourse analysis, pragmatics, systemic functional linguistics, and cognitive linguistics. His recent publications include The Pragmatics of Logophoricity (2012) and “A typological study of motion events in modern Chinese” (2014, Chinese Teaching in the World, 3).

Gordon Tucker

Dr. Gordon Tucker was formerly senior lecturer in the Centre for Language and Communication Research at Cardiff University. Since his retirement he has retained an affiliation with Cardiff University. He is the co-developer, along with Professor Robin Fawcett, of the systemic functional model of language known as the Cardiff Grammar. He is author of The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A systemic functional approach to lexis (Cassell Academic 1998) and has published over forty journal articles and book chapters.

References

Cheung, Ming.2011. Sales promotion communication in Chinese and English: A thematic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics43. 10611079.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.010Search in Google Scholar

Crompton, Peter.2004. Theme in discourse: “Thematic progression” and “method of development” re-evaluated. Functions of Language11(2). 213249.10.1075/fol.11.2.04croSearch in Google Scholar

Daneš, Frantisek. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F.Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective, 106128. Prague: Academic.10.1515/9783111676524.106Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty Lou. 1987. A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text7(2). 89116.10.1515/text.1.1987.7.2.89Search in Google Scholar

Eden,Sum-hung Li. 2007. A systemic functional grammar of Chinese. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Firbas, Jan.1986. On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective. In Charles R.Cooper & SidneyGreenbaum (eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches, 4071. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Gill.1990. Theme in daily press. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics4. 5157.Search in Google Scholar

Fries, Peter H.1995. Patterns of information in initial position in English. In Peter H.Fries & MichaelGregory (eds.), Discourse and meaning in society: Functional perspectives, 4766. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Gomez-Gonzalez, M. A.1994. The relevance of theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. Word45(3). 293305.10.1080/00437956.1994.11435929Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K.1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K.2003. Introduction: On the architecture of human language. In J.Webster (ed.), On language and linguistics, 132. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hawes, Thomas & SarahThomas.1996. Rhetorical uses of theme in newspaper editorials. World Englishes15(2). 159170.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00102.xSearch in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan.1985. On theme and rheme in English [in Chinese]. Journal of Foreign Languages5. 3236.Search in Google Scholar

Leong Ping, A.2005. Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies7(6). 701732.10.1177/1461445605055423Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yue’e & HongyaFan. 2002. Discourse analysis [in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna.1996. Discourse competence: Evidence from thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E.Ventola & A.Mauranen (eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues, 195230. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.41.13mauSearch in Google Scholar

McCabe, Anne M.1999. Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aston in Birmingham.Search in Google Scholar

Moya, A. Jesús & Jesús AngelAvila. 2009. Thematic progression in children’s stories as related to different stages of cognitive development. Text29(6). 755774.10.1515/TEXT.2009.038Search in Google Scholar

Nida, Eugene A.1982. Translating meanings. San Dimas, CA: English Language Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Orlikowski, Wanda J. & JaAnneYates. 1994. Genre repertoire: Norms and forms for work and interaction. Working paper #166, Center for Coordination Science, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff.2000. Introducing functional grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Shenghuan.1982. Theme and rheme [in Chinese]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research1. 17.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Yongsheng.1995. Thematic progression patterns and discourse analysis [in Chinese]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research3. 612.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-6-13
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2015-0008/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button